Honor 400 Pro 5G VS Vivo V60

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 are waterproof, each with an IP68 rating, ensuring they can withstand submersion in water for a specified period. In terms of design, the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a weight of 205 g, while the Vivo V60 is slightly lighter at 192 g. The thickness of the Honor 400 Pro 5G is 8.1 mm, making it a bit thicker than the Vivo V60, which is 7.5 mm thick. The width of the Honor 400 Pro 5G is 76.1 mm, just a touch narrower compared to the Vivo V60, which measures 77 mm in width. In terms of height, the Vivo V60 stands taller at 163.5 mm, whereas the Honor 400 Pro 5G is 156.5 mm in height.

The volume of the Honor 400 Pro 5G is 96.468165 cm³, slightly larger than the Vivo V60’s 94.42125 cm³. Neither phone features a rugged build, nor can they be folded, as specified in their designs. Both phones are similar in terms of waterproofing, but the slight differences in their physical dimensions, including weight, thickness, width, and height, may influence user preference based on size and feel.

Overall, the main design differences lie in the dimensions, where the Vivo V60 is slightly lighter, thinner, taller, and a bit wider, whereas the Honor 400 Pro 5G is somewhat more compact and heavier. Both devices share the same IP68 water resistance rating, ensuring durability against water damage.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a 6.7″ screen, while the Vivo V60 has a slightly larger 6.77″ screen. The Honor 400 Pro 5G's display boasts a higher pixel density of 460 ppi, compared to the Vivo V60's 388 ppi, which means the Honor 400 Pro 5G may offer sharper images and text. In terms of resolution, the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a higher 1280 x 2800 px resolution, compared to the Vivo V60's 1080 x 2392 px resolution, resulting in better overall image clarity on the Honor model.

Both phones feature a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling and responsiveness. However, the Honor 400 Pro 5G is notably brighter, with a typical brightness of 5000 nits, while the Vivo V60 has a lower brightness of 1500 nits, which may affect visibility in bright conditions. The Honor 400 Pro 5G includes an Always-On Display feature, which the Vivo V60 lacks. Neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, meaning their displays are not optimized for high dynamic range content.

Regarding durability, the Vivo V60 has branded damage-resistant glass, a feature not found on the Honor 400 Pro 5G. Both phones do not have secondary screens and are equipped with touch screens. Overall, the displays on both phones offer similar core features, but the Honor 400 Pro 5G stands out with its higher resolution, pixel density, brightness, and Always-On Display functionality.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 offer 512GB of internal storage, ensuring ample space for apps, media, and files. In terms of RAM, the Honor 400 Pro 5G comes with 12GB, while the Vivo V60 is equipped with 16GB of RAM, providing more memory for multitasking on the Vivo model. The Honor 400 Pro 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, while the Vivo V60 uses the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. The Honor's chipset has a faster CPU speed with cores running at 3 x 3.15 GHz, 2 x 2.96 GHz, 2 x 2.26 GHz, and 1 x 3.3 GHz, compared to the Vivo V60's 1 x 2.8 GHz, 4 x 2.4 GHz, and 3 x 1.8 GHz. The GPU clock speed of the Vivo V60 is slightly higher at 1000 MHz, versus the Honor 400 Pro 5G's 900 MHz.

Both devices support integrated LTE, 64-bit processing, and DirectX 12, along with integrated graphics. They both also support OpenGL ES 3.2 and utilize big.LITTLE technology for better power efficiency. Both phones have TrustZone security, OpenCL 2 support, and multithreading capabilities. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 76.6 GB/s, while the Vivo V60 offers a lower 33.6 GB/s bandwidth.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G's chipset operates at a higher thermal design power (TDP) of 12.5W, compared to the Vivo V60's 6W. Both phones feature DDR5 memory, with the Honor 400 Pro 5G's RAM speed slightly faster at 4800 MHz versus the Vivo V60's 4200 MHz. Overall, the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a more powerful chipset, higher CPU and GPU speeds, and greater memory bandwidth, but the Vivo V60 offers more RAM and a higher GPU clock speed.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 both feature a multi-lens main camera setup. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a 200 MP, 50 MP, and 12 MP configuration, while the Vivo V60 uses a 50 MP, 50 MP, and 8 MP setup. The wide apertures of the Honor 400 Pro 5G's lenses are 1.9, 2.4, and 2.2f, while the Vivo V60 has slightly larger apertures of 1.9, 2.7, and 2f. Both phones support 3x optical zoom, have phase-detection autofocus for photos, and continuous autofocus when recording movies. Both also support slow-motion video recording, built-in HDR mode, manual exposure, flash, and manual ISO settings.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G's front camera is a dual-lens setup, consisting of a 50 MP and 2 MP camera, while the Vivo V60 has a 50 MP single-lens front camera. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash, but both have flash on the main camera. The number of flash LEDs on the Honor 400 Pro 5G is 1, while the Vivo V60 uses 4 flash LEDs. Both phones allow for creating panoramas in-camera, support timelapse functions, and have manual white balance and touch autofocus, but neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording.

In terms of sensor technology, both phones use CMOS sensors and lack a BSI sensor. Neither supports 360° panorama shooting, laser autofocus, or front-facing cameras under the display. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a dual-lens front camera, while the Vivo V60 has a single-lens front camera. Overall, both phones have robust camera features, but the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a higher-resolution main camera setup and a dual-lens front camera, while the Vivo V60 offers a larger number of flash LEDs on its main camera.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 run on Android 15 and come with a similar set of privacy and customization features. Both devices have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. However, neither of the phones supports Mail Privacy Protection or blocks cross-site tracking. Both devices also offer on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, the ability to play games while they download, dark mode, battery health checks, and extra dim modes. They also share features such as dynamic theming, app offloading, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, PiP, sharing intents, child locks, widgets, offline voice recognition, and voice commands.

One area where both phones align is that neither supports Quick Start or can be used as a PC. Additionally, both phones track the current position of a mobile device, are multi-user systems, and are free and open source. The Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 also have similar features like PiP (Picture-in-Picture), support for offline voice recognition, and the ability to create and use custom notifications.

Overall, the operating systems on the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 are very similar, offering a robust range of privacy settings, customization options, and functionality. The only key difference is that both phones have identical features across the board, with no distinct advantages in terms of operating system capabilities.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 differ slightly in their battery capacities. The Honor 400 Pro 5G is equipped with a 6000 mAh battery, while the Vivo V60 has a slightly larger 6500 mAh battery. Both devices feature a rechargeable, non-removable battery, and both come with a charger included. The Honor 400 Pro 5G supports wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, whereas the Vivo V60 does not support wireless charging or reverse wireless charging. Both phones support fast charging, but the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a faster charging speed of 100W, while the Vivo V60 supports a slightly lower 90W charging speed.

Both phones include a battery level indicator, allowing users to monitor their battery status. Neither device has a removable battery, and both are equipped with rechargeable batteries. The Vivo V60's battery is larger, but the Honor 400 Pro 5G offers faster charging capabilities and additional wireless charging features.

In summary, the Honor 400 Pro 5G stands out with its wireless charging and reverse wireless charging capabilities, as well as its faster charging speed, while the Vivo V60 offers a slightly larger battery capacity but lacks wireless charging features.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 do not feature a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning they rely on wireless audio solutions or USB-C audio for wired connections. Both phones come with stereo speakers, providing a richer audio experience compared to mono speakers. In terms of audio codec support, the Honor 400 Pro 5G offers aptX HD, but does not support aptX, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. The Vivo V60, on the other hand, does not support any of these audio codecs, including aptX HD.

Neither device includes a built-in radio, and both lack support for LDAC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless. The absence of the 3.5 mm audio jack may make them less compatible with traditional wired headphones, but both devices support wireless audio technologies like Bluetooth.

Overall, both phones are fairly similar in their audio capabilities, with the Honor 400 Pro 5G offering support for aptX HD but lacking more advanced audio codecs like LDAC or aptX Lossless, while the Vivo V60 does not support any advanced audio codecs beyond basic Bluetooth audio support.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 support 5G connectivity and feature dual SIM card slots, allowing for dual-network use. Both devices support NFC, have USB Type-C ports with USB 2.0, and feature Bluetooth 5.4 for wireless connectivity. The Honor 400 Pro 5G offers a broader range of Wi-Fi standards, including Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), while the Vivo V60 supports only Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax). Both phones lack external memory slots.

In terms of sensors, both devices are equipped with a fingerprint scanner, accelerometer, gyroscope, compass, infrared sensor, and GPS. Neither device supports ANT+, has a heart rate monitor, or includes a barometer. Both phones also have cellular modules and support Galileo for satellite navigation. However, the Honor 400 Pro 5G lacks a gyroscope, while the Vivo V60 has one. Both phones are not equipped with emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, motion tracking, optical tracking, 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, or a built-in projector.

Overall, both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 are quite similar in terms of connectivity and features, with the main difference being the Honor 400 Pro 5G’s support for Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7, which the Vivo V60 does not offer. Additionally, the Vivo V60 has a gyroscope, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G lacks this sensor.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Vivo V60 come with a video light, which can be useful for improving video quality in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning both phones use more traditional screen technologies without these specific enhancements.

Overall, the miscellaneous features of both phones are nearly identical, with both offering a video light and lacking sapphire glass, curved, or e-paper displays.

There are no notable differences between the two phones in this category based on the provided specifications.