Honor 400 Pro 5G VS Vivo X200 FE

The Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE have similar designs but differ slightly in key specifications. In terms of water resistance, the Honor 400 Pro 5G is rated as waterproof with an IP68 rating, while the Vivo X200 FE is only water resistant with an IP69 rating. Both ratings suggest strong protection against water and dust, but the Honor 400 Pro 5G may offer a bit more peace of mind in harsher conditions due to the IP68 rating.

When it comes to weight, the Honor 400 Pro 5G is heavier at 205 g, compared to the Vivo X200 FE at 186 g, which is 19 g lighter. The thickness of the two devices is quite similar, with the Honor 400 Pro 5G measuring 8.1 mm and the Vivo X200 FE slightly thinner at 8 mm. The width and height of the two phones also vary slightly, with the Honor 400 Pro 5G being wider (76.1 mm) and taller (156.5 mm) compared to the Vivo X200 FE, which is narrower (71.8 mm) and shorter (150.8 mm).

In terms of volume, the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a slightly larger body, measuring 96.47 cm³, while the Vivo X200 FE has a smaller volume of 86.62 cm³. Neither device features a rugged build, and neither can be folded.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a larger screen size at 6.7″, while the Vivo X200 FE has a slightly smaller 6.31″ display. The pixel densities of both displays are very similar, with the Honor 400 Pro 5G at 460 ppi and the Vivo X200 FE at 461 ppi, offering comparable sharpness in visuals.

The resolution of the two phones differs slightly. The Honor 400 Pro 5G offers a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 px, while the Vivo X200 FE has a resolution of 1216 x 2640 px. This means the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a slightly higher vertical pixel count. Both devices feature a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and gaming experiences.

In terms of additional features, the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE both support an Always-On Display, but neither supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision. The Vivo X200 FE does include branded damage-resistant glass, which the Honor 400 Pro 5G lacks. Neither phone has a secondary screen, and both are touch-enabled displays.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE are equipped with 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, ensuring ample space and smooth multitasking for most users. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a higher AnTuTu benchmark score of 2,010,000, compared to the Vivo X200 FE's score of 1,793,117, suggesting that the Honor 400 Pro 5G may offer slightly better overall performance in certain tasks.

Regarding the chipset, the Honor 400 Pro 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X200 FE uses the Mediatek Dimensity 9300 Plus. Both devices use a 4 nm semiconductor, support 64-bit architecture, and have integrated LTE, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 features a more varied CPU setup with cores clocked at 3.15 GHz, 2.96 GHz, 2.26 GHz, and 3.3 GHz, while the Dimensity 9300 Plus has a CPU with cores clocked at 3.4 GHz, 2.85 GHz, and 2 GHz.

In terms of GPU performance, the Honor 400 Pro 5G has the Adreno 750 with a clock speed of 900 MHz, whereas the Vivo X200 FE features the Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 with a higher clock speed of 1300 MHz. The Honor 400 Pro 5G also has a Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 7,325 and a single-core score of 2,213, while the Vivo X200 FE scores slightly higher with 7,547 multi-core and 2,302 single-core. Both phones have the same maximum memory bandwidth of 76.6–76.8 GB/s and support DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2, but the Honor 400 Pro 5G supports multithreading, whereas the Vivo X200 FE does not. Both devices also have 2 memory channels, and their L3 caches are 12 MB for the Honor 400 Pro 5G and 18 MB for the Vivo X200 FE.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE both feature multi-lens main cameras, but their configurations differ. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a 200 MP, 50 MP, and 12 MP triple camera setup, while the Vivo X200 FE uses a 50 MP, 50 MP, and 8 MP configuration. Both phones offer a 3x optical zoom. The wide aperture values of the two devices are also slightly different: the Honor 400 Pro 5G's main cameras have apertures of 1.9, 2.4, and 2.2f, while the Vivo X200 FE’s apertures are 1.9, 2.7, and 2.2f.

For front cameras, the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a dual-lens setup with a 50 MP and 2 MP combination, while the Vivo X200 FE features a single 50 MP front camera. Both devices have built-in optical image stabilization, phase-detection autofocus, manual exposure, flash, and support for slow-motion video recording, but the Honor 400 Pro 5G’s front camera also includes a dual-lens setup, which the Vivo X200 FE lacks.

Additional features for both phones are mostly similar, including continuous autofocus when recording movies, manual ISO and white balance controls, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and neither has a front-facing LED flash or a front-facing camera under the display. However, the Vivo X200 FE includes laser autofocus, which the Honor 400 Pro 5G lacks.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE run Android 15 and share nearly identical operating system features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and support theme customization. They also have the ability to block app tracking, on-device machine learning, customizable notifications, and support for dark mode, among other common features. Both phones allow users to offload apps, use Live Text, take full-page screenshots, and support split-screen functionality.

There are a few differences between the two phones' OS features. For instance, neither device offers Mail Privacy Protection, Wi-Fi password sharing, or focus modes. Both also lack Quick Start functionality. However, they do offer PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode, child lock, widgets support, offline voice recognition, and voice commands. Both phones track the current position of the device and function as multi-user systems, but neither can be used as a PC.

Overall, the operating systems of the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE are very similar, with only minor feature variations such as PiP availability and a lack of Quick Start on both devices.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE both feature large batteries, but their capacities and charging features differ. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a 6000 mAh battery, while the Vivo X200 FE comes with a slightly larger 6500 mAh battery. The Honor 400 Pro 5G supports wireless charging, unlike the Vivo X200 FE, which does not offer this feature. Additionally, the Honor 400 Pro 5G supports fast charging at a higher speed of 100W, whereas the Vivo X200 FE supports fast charging at 90W.

Both phones come with a charger included, have non-removable rechargeable batteries, and feature a battery level indicator. Neither device has a removable battery, and both include the standard rechargeable battery type. Overall, the Honor 400 Pro 5G offers the advantage of wireless charging and faster fast charging, but the Vivo X200 FE has a slightly larger battery capacity.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE do not feature a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning neither device supports wired headphones or audio accessories directly. Both phones do, however, come equipped with stereo speakers for enhanced audio output. In terms of Bluetooth audio support, the Honor 400 Pro 5G supports aptX HD but lacks aptX, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless. The Vivo X200 FE, on the other hand, supports aptX, aptX HD, but also lacks LDAC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless.

Neither device includes a radio feature, so users will need to rely on internet streaming for radio or music playback. Both phones provide a robust audio experience through their stereo speakers, though the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a slight edge with its aptX HD support for high-quality audio streaming.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE support 5G connectivity, and offer the same range of Wi-Fi capabilities, including Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 6E, and Wi-Fi 7. Both devices use 2 SIM cards, support Bluetooth 5.4, and feature USB Type-C ports with USB version 2. Neither device offers an external memory slot. Additionally, both phones include NFC, fingerprint scanners, GPS, and a compass. They also have accelerometers and infrared sensors.

One notable difference is in the upload speeds. The Honor 400 Pro 5G supports a maximum upload speed of 3500 MBits/s, while the Vivo X200 FE supports a much higher upload speed of 7000 MBits/s. Another difference is that the Vivo X200 FE includes a gyroscope, which the Honor 400 Pro 5G lacks. Neither phone has emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, or DLNA certification, and neither supports ANT+ or includes a heart rate monitor.

Both devices support Galileo for positioning, but they lack other advanced tracking features like motion tracking, optical tracking, or built-in projectors. The Vivo X200 FE also includes the same basic features as the Honor 400 Pro 5G in terms of 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, and stylus support, which are not present on either device.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE feature a video light, which can be useful for low-light photography or video recording. Neither device comes with a sapphire glass display, and neither features a curved display or an e-paper display. These specifications are identical for both phones, with no differences between them in this group.

In summary, the Honor 400 Pro 5G and Vivo X200 FE have the same miscellaneous features, including the presence of a video light, but lack sapphire glass, curved displays, and e-paper displays.