Honor 400 Smart 5G VS Vivo V60 Lite 5G

Both the Honor 400 Smart 5G and the Vivo V60 Lite 5G share an IP65 water-resistance rating, meaning neither is built for submersion but both can handle splashes, rain, and dust without issue. Neither adopts a rugged or foldable form factor, so they target the same mainstream, slim-smartphone audience.

Where they diverge is in their physical proportions. The Vivo V60 Lite is noticeably slimmer at 7.6 mm versus the Honor's 8.4 mm, a difference of nearly a full millimeter that is genuinely perceptible in-hand and in a pocket. It is also slightly shorter and narrower, resulting in a meaningfully smaller overall volume — 94.98 cm³ compared to 107.67 cm³ for the Honor. On the flip side, the Honor 400 Smart actually weighs less at 189 g versus the Vivo's 194 g, which is a modest but real 5 g advantage for extended one-handed use or prolonged calls.

In practice, the Vivo V60 Lite has the clear edge in pocketability and sleekness thanks to its thinner profile and smaller footprint, making it feel more premium in the hand despite being slightly heavier. The Honor 400 Smart trades that slim feel for a marginally lighter weight, which some users may prefer during long sessions. For most buyers prioritizing a compact, svelte design, the Vivo holds a modest but tangible advantage in this category.

Both phones share a 6.77-inch screen and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate, so on paper they feel like equals — but the panel technology underneath tells a very different story. The Honor 400 Smart uses an LCD IPS display, while the Vivo V60 Lite steps up to an OLED/AMOLED panel. OLED screens produce true blacks by switching off individual pixels, deliver richer contrast, and typically render colors with greater vibrancy than even the best LCD panels can match.

The resolution gap reinforces this divide. The Vivo's 1080 x 2392 px resolution yields a pixel density of 388 ppi, while the Honor's 720 x 1610 px screen lands at just 261 ppi — a difference of over 125 pixels per inch. At typical viewing distances, text and fine detail on the Honor will appear noticeably softer, particularly when reading small fonts or scrolling through high-resolution images. The Vivo also supports HDR10 and HDR10+, meaning compatible streaming content will display a wider brightness and color range, an advantage the Honor entirely lacks.

The Vivo V60 Lite holds a commanding advantage in this category. Sharper resolution, superior contrast from its OLED panel, and HDR support combine to make it a meaningfully better screen for media consumption, gaming, and everyday use. The Honor 400 Smart's LCD display is functional but lags behind on every qualitative metric that matters for display quality.

At the silicon level, the Vivo V60 Lite carries a structural advantage: its MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is built on a 4nm process, compared to the 6nm node of the Honor 400 Smart's Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3. A smaller semiconductor node generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning the Vivo's chip can sustain higher workloads for longer without throttling — an edge that matters during gaming sessions or prolonged app usage.

The memory story favors the Vivo even more decisively. It ships with 12GB of DDR5 RAM running at a striking 6400 MHz, and supports a maximum of 16GB — versus the Honor's 8GB of DDR4 at just 2133 MHz. The generational leap from DDR4 to DDR5 alone brings significantly faster data throughput, but the near-threefold difference in clock speed means the Vivo's memory subsystem is in a different class entirely. In practice, this results in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and more headroom for demanding applications. The Vivo's GPU also edges ahead with a slightly higher clock speed of 1047 MHz versus 950 MHz on the Honor's Adreno 619.

The Vivo V60 Lite wins this category clearly and across multiple dimensions. More RAM, a faster memory architecture, a more modern chip fabrication process, and a higher GPU clock speed collectively give it a tangible performance advantage — not just on paper, but in everyday responsiveness and long-term future-proofing.

The rear camera systems look similar on the surface — both lead with a 50MP primary sensor — but the secondary lens reveals a gap. The Vivo V60 Lite pairs its main shooter with an 8MP secondary camera, while the Honor 400 Smart settles for a 2MP companion lens. A 2MP secondary is typically limited to depth-sensing duties only, offering minimal real-world versatility, whereas 8MP can meaningfully contribute to ultrawide or macro shots depending on implementation. The Vivo's primary lens also has a slightly wider aperture at f/2.2 versus the Honor's f/2.4, which in theory admits a touch more light in low-light conditions.

The most dramatic split, however, is on the front. The Vivo V60 Lite sports a 32MP selfie camera, compared to just 5MP on the Honor 400 Smart. This is not a marginal difference — it represents a fundamentally different class of selfie capability, with far more detail, better cropping flexibility, and significantly improved quality for video calls or portrait shots. Notably, the Honor's front aperture of f/2.2 is wider than the Vivo's f/2.5, so it lets in more light per pixel, but that advantage cannot compensate for the enormous resolution gap. On the flip side, the Honor 400 Smart supports slow-motion video and timelapse recording, two creative modes the Vivo V60 Lite lacks entirely.

Overall, the Vivo V60 Lite holds the stronger camera profile for most users, driven almost entirely by its vastly superior 32MP front camera and more capable secondary rear lens. The Honor 400 Smart carves out a niche for video enthusiasts who value slow-motion and timelapse, but for everyday photography — especially selfies — the Vivo is the clear winner in this category.

Rarely does a spec group produce a result this definitive: the Honor 400 Smart 5G and the Vivo V60 Lite 5G are in a complete dead heat. Both run Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every single data point provided — from privacy controls like location and camera/microphone permissions, to productivity features like split-screen, Picture-in-Picture, and full-page screenshots.

The shared highlights are worth noting for buyers. Both devices include on-device machine learning, dynamic theming, offline voice recognition, and a battery health check tool — features that collectively represent a well-rounded, modern Android experience. The inclusion of multi-user support, a child lock, and customizable notifications also signals that both are positioned as versatile, family-friendly devices rather than stripped-down budget offerings.

This category is an unambiguous tie. Neither phone holds any software advantage over the other based on the provided data, and a buyer's decision here should rest entirely on the differences identified in other spec groups.

On raw capacity, these two phones are perfectly matched — both carry an identically sized 6500 mAh battery, a generous cell that comfortably places them among the longer-lasting devices in their segment. Neither supports wireless or reverse wireless charging, and both ship with a charger included, so the playing field is level on every dimension except one: charging speed.

That single differentiator is significant. The Vivo V60 Lite charges at 90W, while the Honor 400 Smart tops out at 35W. To put that in practical terms, a 90W charger can typically replenish a large battery from near-empty to full in roughly an hour or less, whereas 35W would take considerably longer — potentially over two hours for a cell this size. For users who grab quick top-ups between tasks or frequently find themselves in a hurry, this gap translates directly into less time tethered to a wall outlet.

The Vivo V60 Lite takes a clear edge in this category. Since battery longevity is identical, the 90W fast charging is the sole but genuinely meaningful differentiator — and it is the kind of real-world convenience that users notice every single day.

Stereo speakers are the one thing these two phones share in audio, and from there the Honor 400 Smart 5G pulls decisively ahead. It retains a 3.5mm headphone jack — a feature the Vivo V60 Lite has dropped entirely — which matters to anyone who owns wired headphones or uses audio in environments where Bluetooth is impractical, such as on a plane or in a gym with spotty wireless connectivity.

The wireless audio gap is equally pronounced. The Honor supports aptX, aptX HD, and LDAC, three high-resolution Bluetooth audio codecs that dramatically reduce compression artifacts when streaming to compatible wireless headphones. LDAC in particular, developed by Sony, transmits up to three times more data than standard SBC, making it the codec of choice for audiophiles using quality wireless cans. The Vivo V60 Lite supports none of these codecs, meaning Bluetooth audio is limited to standard quality regardless of how premium a headset the user pairs with it.

The Honor 400 Smart 5G wins this category without contest. The combination of a headphone jack and a full suite of high-resolution wireless audio codecs makes it the far more capable audio device — a notable advantage for music lovers and anyone who takes sound quality seriously.

Much of the connectivity foundation is shared here — both phones support 5G, dual SIM, NFC, Wi-Fi 5, USB Type-C, and GPS with Galileo support. For everyday tasks, users of either device will feel equally well-connected. But dig into the specifics and the Vivo V60 Lite consistently pulls ahead on the metrics that define modern connectivity performance.

The cellular speed gap is the most striking differentiator. The Vivo supports upload speeds of up to 3270 Mbits/s compared to just 1500 Mbits/s on the Honor 400 Smart — more than double — and also leads on downloads at 3270 versus 2500 Mbits/s. For most casual browsing this headroom won't be felt daily, but for users who frequently upload large video files, use mobile hotspot heavily, or work in areas with dense 5G coverage, the Vivo's modem has a tangible real-world ceiling advantage. The Vivo also runs Bluetooth 5.4 against the Honor's 5.1, bringing incremental improvements in connection stability and energy efficiency.

A smaller but notable hardware difference: the Vivo includes a gyroscope, which the Honor 400 Smart lacks. A gyroscope enables more accurate motion detection, AR applications, and smoother gaming controls — its absence on the Honor is a genuine functional gap for those use cases. Taken together, the Vivo V60 Lite holds a clear edge in this category, particularly on cellular throughput and sensor breadth.

The Miscellaneous category offers no grounds for differentiation whatsoever. The Honor 400 Smart 5G and the Vivo V60 Lite 5G match each other point for point across every spec provided: both include a video light, and neither features a sapphire glass display, a curved display, or an e-paper display.

This is a complete tie, and buyers should weight this category accordingly — which is to say, not at all. The decision between these two devices rests entirely on the meaningful differences uncovered in other spec groups.