Honor GT Pro VS Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB

The Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB are both waterproof, but they have different Ingress Protection (IP) ratings. The Honor GT Pro has an IP68 rating, meaning it’s protected against dust and can be submerged in water up to a certain depth. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, on the other hand, has an IPX8 rating, indicating it’s only tested for water resistance, but it does not have the same level of dust protection as the Honor GT Pro.

In terms of physical dimensions, the Honor GT Pro is slightly larger and heavier, with a weight of 212 g, a thickness of 8.6 mm, and dimensions of 75.7 mm in width and 162.1 mm in height. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra weighs 199 g, is thinner at 7.2 mm, and has a width of 74 mm and a height of 171.5 mm. The Razr is more compact overall, with a smaller volume of 91.3752 cm³ compared to the Honor GT Pro’s 105.530342 cm³.

Another difference is the foldable feature; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra can be folded, while the Honor GT Pro cannot. Neither device has a rugged build, which may be important for users looking for extra durability beyond waterproofing.

Both the Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB feature OLED/AMOLED displays, but there are some differences in their specifications. The Honor GT Pro has a 6.78″ screen with a pixel density of 453 ppi, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a slightly larger 7″ screen and a lower pixel density of 417 ppi. The Razr’s larger display results in a slightly lower pixel density, but both displays have a resolution of 1224 x 2800 px for the Honor and 1224 x 2912 px for the Razr, providing high clarity and detail on both devices.

In terms of refresh rate, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has an advantage with a 165Hz refresh rate, compared to the Honor GT Pro’s 144Hz. Both phones support HDR10 and HDR10+, offering a richer color experience, but the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra also supports Dolby Vision, which the Honor GT Pro does not.

Additionally, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a secondary screen, which the Honor GT Pro lacks. Both devices feature branded damage-resistant glass and support touchscreens, ensuring durability and ease of use for users.

The Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB share many similar performance characteristics, both featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, Adreno 830 GPU, and 16GB of RAM. The Honor GT Pro has a slight edge in CPU speed with 2 cores running at 4.47 GHz and 6 cores at 3.53 GHz, compared to the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra's 4.32 GHz on its two faster cores. The Honor GT Pro also achieves a higher AnTuTu benchmark score of 2,920,000, while the Razr 60 Ultra scores 1,831,212. In terms of Geekbench 6 scores, the Honor GT Pro outperforms with a multi-core score of 10,059 and a single-core score of 3,234, compared to the Razr 60 Ultra’s multi-core score of 6,796 and single-core score of 1,753.

Both devices feature the same GPU clock speed of 1,100 MHz, RAM speed of 5300 MHz, and a maximum memory bandwidth of 85.1 GB/s. They also share the same semiconductor size of 3 nm, DirectX version 12, and support for 64-bit architecture, integrated LTE, and multithreading. Neither device supports a memory amount beyond 24GB, with both devices equipped with 12MB of L2 cache and 8MB of L3 cache. Both devices also feature the same GPU turbo frequency of 1,100 MHz, a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 8.2W, and are equipped with integrated graphics.

One distinction between the two is that the Honor GT Pro supports a maximum of 1,024GB of internal storage, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has 512GB. Neither product supports ECC memory differently, and both support two displays. In summary, while the two devices are very similar in their core performance specifications, the Honor GT Pro offers higher storage and performance scores, particularly in multi-core tasks.

The Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB both feature dual-lens main cameras with 50 MP sensors, but their wide apertures differ slightly. The Honor GT Pro has a wider aperture of f/2.0 for its three main cameras, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra’s main cameras have a slightly narrower aperture of f/1.8. Both devices offer optical image stabilization (OIS) and phase-detection autofocus for photos, as well as continuous autofocus for video recording. The Honor GT Pro supports 3x optical zoom, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra does not support optical zoom, offering a 0x zoom.

When it comes to video recording, the Honor GT Pro supports 4K video at 60 fps, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra records at a higher resolution of 8K at 30 fps. The Honor GT Pro features a dual-tone LED flash with 3 LEDs, whereas the Razr 60 Ultra has a single LED flash without the dual-tone feature. Both phones support slow-motion video, HDR mode, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera, but the Honor GT Pro supports shooting raw images, while the Razr 60 Ultra does not. The Razr 60 Ultra has additional features like HDR10 and Dolby Vision recording, which are not supported by the Honor GT Pro.

Both devices have a 50 MP front camera with a wide aperture of f/2.0, and neither has a front-facing LED flash. Neither phone has a front camera under the display, and both lack 3D photo or video recording capabilities. Additionally, both devices support manual exposure, ISO, and white balance, as well as timelapse functionality. The Honor GT Pro offers a more versatile camera setup overall, with more advanced zoom and raw photo capabilities, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra stands out with its 8K video recording and Dolby Vision support.

Both the Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB run Android 15 and share many common features in their operating systems. Both devices offer clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They also both support features like blocking app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, and dark mode. Additionally, both devices allow for game downloads while playing, and have battery health checks and an extra dim mode for lower brightness settings.

Both phones also support dynamic theming, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen, picture-in-picture (PiP), sharing intents, child locks, widgets, and offline voice recognition. They are also both multi-user systems, have voice commands, and can track the device’s current position. Neither device, however, supports Wi-Fi password sharing or quick start functionality, and both devices lack focus modes and the ability to be used as a PC.

Notably, while both devices are free and open source, neither the Honor GT Pro nor the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra get direct OS updates. This means that although they run the same version of Android, future updates may be handled differently by each manufacturer.

The Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB both come with rechargeable batteries, but they differ in capacity and charging capabilities. The Honor GT Pro is equipped with a larger 7200 mAh battery, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a 4700 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the Honor GT Pro supports a higher charging speed of 90W, compared to the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra's 68W fast charging speed. However, the Razr 60 Ultra offers the added convenience of wireless charging, which the Honor GT Pro does not support.

Both devices feature a battery level indicator and lack removable batteries. They also both have rechargeable batteries, ensuring they can be used over long periods without needing to replace the power source.

In summary, while the Honor GT Pro offers a larger battery with faster charging, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the added benefit of wireless charging support.

Both the Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB do not feature a 3.5 mm audio jack. However, they both come with stereo speakers for audio output. When it comes to wireless audio, both devices support aptX, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive. The Honor GT Pro lacks support for aptX Lossless and LDAC, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra offers support for aptX Lossless in addition to the same codecs, but also lacks LDAC support. Both phones do not have a built-in radio.

Overall, the audio features on both devices are quite similar, with the key difference being the addition of aptX Lossless on the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, giving it a slight edge in terms of high-quality audio streaming support.

Both the Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB support 5G connectivity and feature similar wireless capabilities, including support for Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be). However, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra also supports Wi-Fi 6E, which the Honor GT Pro does not. Both devices offer Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, and USB Type-C with USB version 2. Additionally, both support download speeds of up to 10,000 MBits/s and upload speeds of 3,500 MBits/s, and they each have a fingerprint scanner for security.

The Honor GT Pro offers dual SIM card support (2 SIMs), while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra supports one SIM card and one eSIM. The Razr 60 Ultra also has a barometer, which the Honor GT Pro lacks. Both devices include a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass, and they both feature a cellular module. Neither device supports an infrared sensor, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner. Additionally, neither includes a stylus or a built-in projector, and both lack motion and optical tracking features.

In summary, the main differences between the two devices in this category are the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra's support for Wi-Fi 6E and the inclusion of a barometer, which are not available on the Honor GT Pro. Both devices share many connectivity features, including 5G support, Bluetooth, NFC, and USB Type-C.

Both the Honor GT Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 512GB come with a video light, providing enhanced lighting for video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, making their screen technology similar in this regard.

Overall, the miscellaneous features of both devices are identical, with both phones supporting a video light while lacking advanced display technologies like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.