Honor X70 VS OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

Both the Honor X70 and the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing weigh exactly 199 g and share a near-identical width of roughly 76 mm, meaning in-hand feel and one-handed reachability are essentially the same. Neither features a rugged build or a foldable form factor, so they occupy the same mainstream slab-phone category.

Where the designs diverge is in compactness and water protection. The Honor X70 is noticeably slimmer at 7.8 mm versus 8.3 mm for the Ace 5 Racing, and its shorter height (161.9 mm vs 163.6 mm) results in a meaningfully smaller overall volume — 96.1 cm³ compared to 103.2 cm³. That roughly 7% reduction in bulk translates to a device that fits more easily into pockets and feels less imposing despite identical weight. On water protection, the X70 is rated Waterproof while the Ace 5 Racing is only Water resistant — a meaningful real-world distinction, as waterproof certification generally implies the device can survive submersion, not just splashes.

The Honor X70 holds a clear design edge here: it is the more pocket-friendly device thanks to its slimmer profile and smaller footprint, and it offers a stronger level of water protection. For users who prioritize a sleeker build and greater peace of mind around liquids, the X70 is the stronger choice in this category.

Both phones use an OLED/AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, branded damage-resistant glass, and HDR10 support — a strong shared foundation that guarantees punchy colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling on either device. Screen sizes are virtually identical at 6.79″ and 6.77″, so there is no practical difference in how much content you see at once.

The meaningful split comes down to resolution and pixel density. The Honor X70 renders at 1200 x 2640 px for a pixel density of 427 ppi, while the Ace 5 Racing tops out at 1080 x 2392 px and 388 ppi. That 39 ppi gap is perceptible — fine text, detailed UI elements, and high-resolution photos will appear sharper on the X70, especially for users who hold their phone close or consume a lot of reading content.

The Honor X70 has a clear display advantage. On identically sized OLED screens with the same refresh rate, the higher-resolution panel is a genuine differentiator, and no other spec in this group offsets it for the Ace 5 Racing.

The surface-level similarities here — both chips are fabbed on a 4 nm process, both use 8-thread big.LITTLE layouts and DDR5 memory — mask a performance gulf that is anything but subtle. The Honor X70 runs on a Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, a mid-range chipset, while the Ace 5 Racing packs a Dimensity 9400e, a flagship-tier SoC. The CPU frequency advantage tells the story directly: the Ace 5 Racing's prime core hits 3.4 GHz versus 2.3 GHz on the X70, and every cluster in the 9400e's lineup outclocks its counterpart.

The memory and GPU picture is even more decisive. The Ace 5 Racing's RAM operates at 8533 MHz versus 2750 MHz on the X70, and its maximum memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s compared to just 12 GB/s — a more than sixfold difference that directly affects how fast data flows to the CPU and GPU during intensive workloads. Add a GPU clock advantage of 1300 MHz versus 800 MHz and more RAM headroom (16 GB vs 12 GB base, expandable to 24 GB vs 16 GB), and the Ace 5 Racing is clearly engineered for a different level of sustained performance in gaming, multitasking, and compute-heavy apps.

The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing wins this category decisively and it is not particularly close. Across CPU throughput, GPU power, memory speed, and bandwidth, it operates in a higher performance class entirely. The X70's Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 is a capable mid-range chip for everyday tasks, but users who care about gaming or future-proofing their device should weigh this gap carefully.

At a glance, both phones share a 50 MP main sensor with OIS, phase-detection autofocus, and a standard feature set covering HDR, slow-motion, and manual controls. But the Ace 5 Racing adds a second rear lens, bumps video to 4K at 60 fps versus the X70's 4K at 30 fps, and crucially supports RAW shooting — a capability the X70 lacks entirely. For video creators and photographers who want uncompressed files for post-processing, that RAW support alone is a significant differentiator.

The selfie camera gap is equally notable. The Ace 5 Racing offers a 16 MP front shooter compared to just 8 MP on the X70, which translates to more detail in portraits and video calls. The X70 does have a slightly wider front aperture at f/2.0 versus f/2.4 on the Ace 5 Racing, meaning it admits more light — a modest low-light advantage — but the resolution difference is harder to overlook for most users. The Ace 5 Racing also pairs its rear camera with a dual-tone, dual-LED flash, which produces more natural-looking artificial lighting than the X70's single LED.

The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing takes this category. The combination of smoother 4K video, RAW photo capture, a higher-resolution front camera, and a multi-lens rear system gives it a broader and more capable imaging toolkit across both stills and video.

This is a rare case of a complete spec-for-spec tie. Both the Honor X70 and the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing run Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every single data point in this category — from privacy controls and dynamic theming to split-screen multitasking, Picture-in-Picture, on-device machine learning, and battery health monitoring.

Notably, neither device receives direct OS updates from Google, meaning both rely on their respective manufacturers for software patches and version upgrades. This is worth keeping in mind for long-term software support considerations, though it does not differentiate one phone from the other here.

This category is a draw. Based strictly on the provided specs, there is no software feature or OS capability that separates these two devices — the choice between them should rest entirely on the hardware differences analyzed in other categories.

Battery capacity is where the Honor X70 makes its most dramatic statement. An 8300 mAh cell is exceptionally large by any standard — 1300 mAh more than the already-generous 7000 mAh pack in the Ace 5 Racing. In practical terms, that kind of headroom translates to meaningfully longer time between charges, making the X70 a compelling option for heavy users, travelers, or anyone who cannot reliably top up during the day.

The Ace 5 Racing counters with faster wired charging at 100W versus the X70's 80W, which partially offsets the smaller battery — a higher-wattage charger can replenish a depleted cell significantly faster, reducing downtime. However, the X70 also supports wireless charging, a convenience feature the Ace 5 Racing omits entirely. For users who have invested in wireless charging pads at home or at work, that absence is a real limitation.

On balance, the Honor X70 holds the edge in this category. Its substantially larger battery offers greater endurance, and the addition of wireless charging gives it more flexibility in how and where it tops up — advantages that outweigh the Ace 5 Racing's faster wired charging speed for most use cases.

The shared foundations here are straightforward: both phones drop the 3.5mm headphone jack, offer stereo speakers, and support standard aptX for Bluetooth audio. Neither supports LDAC or a built-in radio, so the meaningful comparison narrows quickly to a single codec split.

The Honor X70 supports aptX Adaptive, while the Ace 5 Racing carries aptX HD. These serve different priorities — aptX HD targets high-resolution audio at up to 576 kbps with a focus on fidelity, whereas aptX Adaptive is a more flexible, modern standard that dynamically adjusts bitrate based on connection conditions, which can reduce latency and maintain quality in less-than-ideal wireless environments. For wireless audio enthusiasts, which codec is more useful depends heavily on whether their headphones support one, the other, or both.

This category is too close to call a clear winner. Both phones offer a meaningful but distinct Bluetooth audio upgrade beyond standard aptX — the X70's aptX Adaptive has an edge in versatility and latency management, while the Ace 5 Racing's aptX HD suits users whose headphones are specifically tuned for that codec. For most listeners without high-end wireless headphones, the practical difference will be negligible.

Much of this category is shared ground — both phones offer 5G, dual SIM, NFC, USB Type-C, an infrared sensor, and an identical sensor suite covering GPS, gyroscope, compass, and accelerometer. The USB port on both is capped at USB 2.0 speeds, so neither has an advantage there for wired data transfer.

The gaps that do exist are meaningful. The Ace 5 Racing supports Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) while the X70 tops out at Wi-Fi 6 — a future-proofing advantage as Wi-Fi 7 routers become more common, offering lower latency and higher throughput in congested environments. That advantage is reinforced by the cellular speed figures: the Ace 5 Racing's modem supports download speeds up to 10,000 Mbits/s versus 2,900 Mbits/s on the X70, and upload speeds of 7,000 Mbits/s versus 1,600 Mbits/s. While real-world 5G networks rarely saturate either ceiling today, the headroom matters as network infrastructure improves. Bluetooth also steps up to 5.4 on the Ace 5 Racing compared to 5.2 on the X70, bringing modest improvements in connection stability and efficiency.

The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing takes this category. Its Wi-Fi 7 support, substantially higher modem speeds, and newer Bluetooth version paint a consistent picture of a more forward-looking connectivity stack — relevant not just today but increasingly so as surrounding infrastructure catches up.

The miscellaneous specs for these two phones are identical across every data point. Both feature a video light, and neither carries a sapphire glass display, a curved screen, or an e-paper panel — placing them squarely in the same conventional design category.

This is a draw. No differentiating factor exists within this group, and the choice between the Honor X70 and the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing should be made entirely on the basis of the more substantive categories covered elsewhere.