Hotwav R9 Plus VS Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus

The Hotwav R9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus differ significantly in their physical designs. The Hotwav R9 Plus is notably heavier at 1066 g, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus weighs only 668 g, making it a lighter option. Additionally, the Hotwav R9 Plus is thicker at 17.8 mm compared to the 6 mm thickness of the Samsung tablet. In terms of dimensions, the Hotwav R9 Plus measures 269.6 mm in width and 182 mm in height, whereas the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus is wider at 300.6 mm and taller at 194.7 mm. This gives the Samsung model a more expansive profile.

When it comes to volume, the Hotwav R9 Plus has a larger footprint at 873.39616 cm³ compared to the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus, which has a volume of 351.16092 cm³. Despite the difference in size and weight, both devices are built to withstand water exposure, as both are waterproof with an IP68 rating and a waterproof depth rating of 1.5 m. Neither product features tilt sensitivity, and neither has a detachable or backlit keyboard, though the Samsung device does include a stylus, which the Hotwav R9 Plus does not.

Overall, while the Hotwav R9 Plus is bulkier and heavier, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus offers a sleeker and lighter design, along with the added benefit of an included stylus.

The Hotwav R9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus have notable differences in their display specifications. The Samsung tablet boasts a larger 13.1″ screen, compared to the 11″ screen of the Hotwav R9 Plus. Additionally, the resolution of the Samsung device is higher, offering 2880 x 1800 px, whereas the Hotwav R9 Plus provides a resolution of 1920 x 1200 px. This results in a higher pixel density on the Samsung model at 259 ppi, while the Hotwav R9 Plus has a pixel density of 224 ppi.

Both products use LCD displays, but only the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus features branded damage-resistant glass, which the Hotwav R9 Plus lacks. Both displays support touch input, but neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, or has an e-paper display. In terms of brightness, the Samsung model is brighter at 600 nits, while the Hotwav R9 Plus offers 400 nits.

While both devices offer LCD screens with touch functionality, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus stands out with its larger, higher-resolution display, higher pixel density, and superior brightness, alongside branded damage-resistant glass.

The Hotwav R9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus differ significantly in terms of performance. The Hotwav R9 Plus comes with 512GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus has 256GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM. Both devices support external memory expansion up to 2000GB. The Hotwav R9 Plus is powered by the Unisoc T606 chipset, with a CPU speed of 2 x 2.2 GHz and 6 x 1.8 GHz cores. In contrast, the Samsung tablet uses the Samsung Exynos 1580 chipset, offering a faster CPU with 1 x 2.9 GHz, 3 x 2.6 GHz, and 4 x 1.95 GHz cores.

The Hotwav R9 Plus has a lower Geekbench 6 result, scoring 1541 in multi-core and 497 in single-core tests, compared to the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus, which scores 3893 in multi-core and 1360 in single-core tests. The GPU in the Hotwav R9 Plus is the Mali-G57MC, with a clock speed of 850 MHz, whereas the Samsung device features the Xclipse 530 GPU with a higher clock speed of 1300 MHz. Both devices use big.LITTLE technology, have integrated LTE, and support 64-bit computing.

Both products offer similar maximum RAM capacities of 12GB, but the Hotwav R9 Plus runs its RAM at a speed of 1866 MHz, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus has a faster RAM speed of 3200 MHz. The Hotwav R9 Plus runs on Android 14, while the Samsung model runs on Android 15. Lastly, the Hotwav R9 Plus has 32 shading units, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus has 256 shading units.

The Hotwav R9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus offer different camera setups. The Hotwav R9 Plus has a more powerful 64 MP main camera, compared to the 13 MP main camera of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus. For the front camera, the Hotwav R9 Plus has a 16 MP sensor, while the Samsung tablet comes with a 12 MP front camera. Both devices feature a built-in HDR mode, touch autofocus, manual white balance, a CMOS sensor, and continuous autofocus when recording movies.

Both the Hotwav R9 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus lack a front-facing LED flash and support for 360° panoramas. The Hotwav R9 Plus does, however, have a video light, while the Samsung model does not. Both devices support manual settings, such as manual ISO, manual exposure, and manual focus, though neither supports manual shutter speed or a serial shot mode.

When it comes to flash, the Hotwav R9 Plus has a regular flash, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus does not include a flash at all. Both cameras also lack built-in optical image stabilization, 3D photo/video recording capabilities, and dual-tone or RGB LED flash options.

Both the Hotwav R9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus feature stereo speakers, providing a similar audio experience in terms of sound output. Neither device includes a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless audio solutions or adaptors for wired headphones. Additionally, neither product has a built-in radio for FM or internet radio listening.

Overall, the audio specifications are identical between the two devices, with both offering stereo speakers but lacking a 3.5 mm audio jack or a radio feature.

The Hotwav R9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus both feature rechargeable batteries, but there are differences in their capacities. The Hotwav R9 Plus is equipped with a larger 20080 mAh battery, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus has a smaller 10090 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, have a battery level indicator, and lack wireless charging capabilities. Additionally, neither device has a removable battery.

Despite the differences in battery size, both tablets share similar features, with the ability to monitor battery levels and fast charging support. However, the Hotwav R9 Plus offers a significantly higher battery capacity than the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus, potentially leading to longer battery life.

The Hotwav R9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus offer many similar connectivity and feature options, with some key differences. Both devices support Wi-Fi versions 4, 5, and 6, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus goes further, also supporting Wi-Fi 6E. The Hotwav R9 Plus uses a traditional SIM card slot, while the Samsung model supports both a standard SIM and an eSIM. Additionally, the Samsung tablet supports 5G connectivity, while the Hotwav R9 Plus is limited to 4G.

Both devices offer features like split screen, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), theme customization, dynamic theming, and dark mode. They also include security features like location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. While both tablets support Bluetooth 5, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus benefits from the newer Bluetooth 5.3 version. The Hotwav R9 Plus supports download speeds of 300 MBits/s, whereas the Samsung device can reach up to 5100 MBits/s for download speeds, offering much higher throughput.

Other features are largely similar, including USB Type-C, a cellular module, the ability to track device position, and offline voice recognition. However, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus includes NFC, a fingerprint scanner, and has a faster upload speed of 1280 MBits/s, while the Hotwav R9 Plus lacks these features. Both tablets have a child lock and share support for widgets and customizable notifications, but the Hotwav R9 Plus lacks features like offloading apps and focus modes, which are absent from both devices.

The Hotwav R9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus differ in their DDR memory versions. The Hotwav R9 Plus uses DDR4 memory, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus is equipped with the newer DDR5 memory. This difference in memory version could affect performance, with DDR5 generally offering higher speeds and better efficiency compared to DDR4.

Aside from this distinction, there are no other specific miscellaneous features provided for comparison between the two devices.