HP MC475 VS Philips NeoPix 444

The HP MC475 and Philips NeoPix 444 both lack a laser light source, so neither product features this advanced technology. However, they differ significantly in size and weight. The HP MC475 is much more compact, measuring 120 mm in width, 100 mm in height, and 160 mm in thickness, with a weight of 1000 g. In contrast, the Philips NeoPix 444 is considerably larger and heavier, with dimensions of 200 mm in width, 190 mm in height, and 220 mm in thickness, and it weighs 2500 g.

In terms of additional features, the HP MC475 offers a dedicated smartphone app, which the Philips NeoPix 444 lacks. The HP MC475’s app support could be a convenience for users seeking remote control or additional functionality through their smartphones, while the NeoPix 444 doesn’t have this feature.

Looking at volume, the difference is substantial: the HP MC475 has a volume of 1920 cm³, while the Philips NeoPix 444 has a much larger volume of 8360 cm³, reflecting the significant size difference between the two products.

Both the HP MC475 and Philips NeoPix 444 share the same output resolution of 1080p, ensuring a similar level of clarity in their projections. Both also feature motorized focus, allowing for easy adjustment of the image sharpness. Neither projector displays 3D content with glasses, and neither supports advanced HDR technologies like HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR10, or HLG, so both devices are limited to standard dynamic range visuals.

The maximum projection size for both projectors is 100″, offering comparable screen sizes for a wide viewing experience. However, the minimum throw distance differs slightly: the HP MC475 requires a minimum distance of 0.7 m, while the Philips NeoPix 444 needs a bit more space at 1.1 m, making the HP MC475 more flexible for smaller spaces.

When it comes to focus adjustment, the HP MC475 lacks manual focus, relying solely on its motorized focus for image sharpness. The Philips NeoPix 444 has the same configuration, with no manual focus option and only motorized focus available. Both projectors also have the same 8-bit bit depth, which should provide similar color depth and detail in images.

When it comes to connectivity, the HP MC475 and Philips NeoPix 444 both feature one HDMI port and one USB port, providing similar options for connecting devices. However, there are several notable differences in additional wireless and wired features. The HP MC475 offers AirPlay, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi support, making it more versatile for wireless connections. It also holds DLNA certification, enabling easier media streaming from compatible devices. On the other hand, the Philips NeoPix 444 lacks AirPlay, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi support, which limits its wireless functionality. Additionally, the NeoPix 444 is not DLNA-certified.

Both projectors do not include a VGA connector or a DVI connector, and neither has an S/PDIF Out port. Both models also lack RJ45 ports, so neither supports wired Ethernet connections. However, these common omissions mean that the primary connectivity differences between the two products lie in the wireless features offered by the HP MC475.

Overall, the HP MC475 offers a more robust range of wireless features, making it a better option for users who prioritize connectivity without the need for additional adapters or cables.

In terms of features, the HP MC475 and Philips NeoPix 444 have several similarities and differences. Both projectors include a remote control and a built-in speaker. The HP MC475 also features built-in smart TV functionality, offering access to streaming services directly from the projector. In contrast, the Philips NeoPix 444 lacks built-in smart TV capabilities, which may limit its direct streaming options.

When it comes to audio, the Philips NeoPix 444 includes stereo speakers, while the HP MC475 does not. However, the HP MC475 does have an audio output power of 1 x 3W, while the NeoPix 444 has a higher output of 2 x 5W, suggesting the Philips model may provide a louder audio experience. Both projectors have a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, enabling external audio connections.

Neither projector features lens shift (vertical or horizontal), Dolby Atmos, or voice commands. Both models also lack an external memory slot. Overall, while both have basic audio and remote control features, the HP MC475 stands out with its built-in smart TV functionality, while the Philips NeoPix 444 offers stereo speakers and a higher audio output power.