Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) VS Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro

The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) and Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro both feature sleek, compact designs, but they differ in several key dimensions. The MatePad 11.5 S is slightly heavier at 515 g, compared to the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro's 494 g. In terms of thickness, the MatePad is a bit thicker, at 6.1 mm, while the Pad 8 Pro is slimmer at 5.8 mm. The MatePad also has a larger footprint, measuring 261 mm in width and 177.3 mm in height, compared to the Xiaomi's 251.2 mm width and 173.4 mm height. This difference gives the MatePad a greater volume, at 282.28 cm³, versus the Pad 8 Pro’s 252.64 cm³.

Both tablets lack water resistance, and neither has tilt sensitivity. However, the MatePad 11.5 S includes a stylus, while the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro does not. The MatePad also supports a detachable keyboard, though it does not feature a backlit keyboard, unlike the Xiaomi, which similarly lacks a detachable keyboard and backlit functionality.

In summary, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S is larger, heavier, and comes with more input options like a stylus and detachable keyboard, whereas the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is slightly more compact and lightweight, without these additional accessories.

The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) and Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro both feature LCD IPS displays with a 144Hz refresh rate, offering smooth and responsive visuals. However, the MatePad has a slightly larger 11.5″ screen size compared to the Pad 8 Pro's 11.2″ display. In terms of resolution, the Huawei tablet offers a 2800 x 1840 px resolution, while the Xiaomi tablet has a higher resolution of 3200 x 2136 px, leading to a sharper image. The Xiaomi also boasts a higher pixel density at 344 ppi, versus the MatePad’s 291 ppi, contributing to more detailed visuals on the Pad 8 Pro.

When it comes to additional features, the MatePad 11.5 S includes an anti-reflection coating but lacks branded damage-resistant glass, HDR10 support, and Dolby Vision. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro offers branded damage-resistant glass, supports HDR10, and includes Dolby Vision support, but it does not have the anti-reflection coating found on the MatePad. Both tablets feature a touchscreen, but neither includes a sapphire glass display, HDR10+, or an e-paper display.

In summary, while both displays offer similar refresh rates and LCD technology, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro has a sharper display with higher resolution and pixel density, along with enhanced visual features like Dolby Vision and HDR10 support, while the MatePad 11.5 S provides an anti-reflection coating for better visibility in bright environments.

The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) and Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro both offer impressive performance, though they differ significantly in certain key specs. Both tablets come with 512GB of internal storage, but the MatePad has 12GB of RAM, while the Pad 8 Pro offers 16GB of RAM. The MatePad is powered by the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 chipset, with a CPU configuration of 1 x 3.13 GHz, 3 x 2.54 GHz, and 4 x 2.05 GHz, paired with the Mali-G57 GPU. The Xiaomi, on the other hand, uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, featuring a more powerful CPU setup of 2 x 4.32 GHz and 6 x 3.53 GHz, along with the Adreno 830 GPU.

When it comes to semiconductor size, the MatePad uses a 5 nm process, while the Pad 8 Pro is built on a more advanced 3 nm process. The MatePad supports an external memory slot, while the Xiaomi does not. The MatePad has a slightly lower TDP of 6W, compared to the Xiaomi’s 8.2W, indicating more energy-efficient processing. The Xiaomi also benefits from higher RAM speed (5300 MHz vs. 2750 MHz on the MatePad), larger L2 and L3 caches (12 MB and 8 MB compared to 0.512 MB and 4 MB), and a higher maximum memory bandwidth (85.1 GB/s vs. 44 GB/s).

Both tablets support 64-bit processing, integrated LTE, big.LITTLE technology, and TrustZone. They also share the same DirectX version (12) and OpenGL ES version (3.2). Additionally, both have integrated graphics, with the MatePad using the Mali-G57 and the Xiaomi featuring the Adreno 830. In terms of cache sizes, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro has a much larger L1 cache (192 KB vs. 64 KB) and L2 cache (12 MB vs. 0.512 MB), which could contribute to faster data access.

The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) and Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro both feature capable camera setups, but they differ in several key aspects. The MatePad has a 13 MP main camera and an 8 MP front camera, while the Pad 8 Pro offers a significantly higher 50 MP main camera and a 32 MP front camera. The MatePad records video at 1080p at 30 fps, whereas the Xiaomi can record at 2160p (4K) at 60 fps, offering more detailed and smoother video recording.

Both tablets have a flash, touch autofocus, and manual controls for ISO, exposure, and white balance. However, the MatePad lacks the ability to create panoramas in-camera, while the Pad 8 Pro can capture panoramas. Neither device has built-in optical image stabilization, 3D photo/video recording capabilities, or HDR10/Dolby Vision recording support. Both have a video light and manual focus, and neither offers a front-facing LED flash.

In terms of aperture, both devices have a wide aperture of f/1.8 for the main camera, though the Pad 8 Pro has a slightly narrower f/2.2 aperture for the front camera compared to the MatePad’s f/2.0. Both tablets also support timelapse functions, but the MatePad has the additional benefit of a built-in HDR mode. The Xiaomi, however, does not feature HDR10 recording support.

Both the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) and Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro offer stereo speakers, which should provide a decent audio experience. However, neither tablet supports any of the advanced aptX audio technologies such as aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Low Latency, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. Additionally, neither device includes a 3.5 mm audio jack socket, so wired headphone users will need to rely on Bluetooth or a USB-C adapter for audio. Both devices also lack a built-in radio feature.

In summary, the audio features are quite similar between the two tablets, with both offering stereo speakers but lacking advanced audio codec support and a 3.5 mm audio jack. Neither device offers a radio either, making them more reliant on streaming or wireless audio solutions.

The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) and Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro both feature sizable batteries, with the MatePad offering an 8800 mAh battery and the Pad 8 Pro slightly surpassing it with a 9200 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but neither includes wireless charging capabilities. Additionally, both tablets are equipped with a battery level indicator and feature rechargeable, non-removable batteries.

In summary, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro offers a slightly larger battery capacity, though both tablets share similar charging features, lack wireless charging, and have rechargeable, non-removable batteries.

The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) and Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro offer a similar set of connectivity and feature options, with a few notable differences. Both tablets support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), but the Xiaomi also adds support for the latest Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), which may provide faster speeds and more robust connectivity in the future. Both devices also include Bluetooth 5.2 (Huawei) and Bluetooth 5.4 (Xiaomi), with the latter offering a slightly more recent version. Both tablets support USB Type-C (with the Huawei using USB 3.0 and the Xiaomi using USB 3.2), but neither includes Ethernet support or an HDMI output.

Other shared features between the two tablets include camera/microphone privacy options, split screen, dark mode, battery health check, child lock, sharing intents, customizable notifications, a gyroscope, accelerometer, and voice commands. Neither device includes an iris scanner, built-in projector, or infrared sensor, and both lack GPS. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro does have a compass, which the MatePad does not. Both are multi-user systems and offer tracking of the device's current position.

In summary, the connectivity and feature sets are mostly similar, with the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro having the edge in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth versions and the added feature of a compass. Both tablets lack 5G support, cellular modules, and advanced connectivity options like HDMI or Ethernet, but they are equipped with essential features for everyday use.