Infinix GT 30 5G VS Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

The most meaningful difference in this group comes down to water protection. The Infinix GT 30 5G carries an IP64 rating, meaning it can handle dust and splashes from any direction — think rain or an accidental sink splash. The Poco X7 Pro, however, steps up to IP68, which means full dust ingress protection and the ability to withstand submersion in water. For users who swim, work outdoors, or simply want extra peace of mind, this is a tangible, real-world advantage for the Poco X7 Pro.

On physical form, the two phones are closely matched but not identical. The GT 30 5G is the lighter of the two at 187 g versus 198 g for the X7 Pro — an 11 g difference that is noticeable over long one-handed use sessions. The GT 30 5G is also fractionally thinner at 8 mm versus 8.3 mm. The X7 Pro is slightly more compact in height (160.8 mm vs 163.7 mm), making it marginally easier to pocket despite its extra weight. Neither device has a rugged build or foldable form factor.

Overall, the Poco X7 Pro holds a clear edge in this group. Its IP68 certification is a significantly stronger protection standard than the GT 30 5G's IP64, and for most buyers that gap matters more than the slight weight and slimness advantage the Infinix carries.

Both phones use OLED/AMOLED panels with near-identical pixel densities (440 ppi vs 446 ppi) and the same 5,000,000:1 contrast ratio, so sharpness and deep blacks are a wash. Where things diverge meaningfully is brightness: the Poco X7 Pro outputs 1400 nits typical versus just 700 nits on the GT 30 5G. That is a doubling of luminance, which in practice translates to dramatically better legibility under direct sunlight — a genuine daily-use advantage.

The refresh rate story cuts the other way. The Infinix GT 30 5G pushes a 144Hz panel, giving it a buttery edge in gaming and fast-scrolling scenarios compared to the X7 Pro's 120Hz. However, the X7 Pro counters with a 480Hz touch sampling rate versus 240Hz on the GT 30 5G — meaning finger inputs are registered twice as frequently, which matters most in competitive gaming where reaction time is critical. Additionally, the X7 Pro supports HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, while the GT 30 5G supports none of these formats, making the X7 Pro considerably more capable for streaming HDR content on platforms like Netflix or Prime Video.

On balance, the Poco X7 Pro holds a clear display advantage. Superior brightness, full HDR ecosystem support, and higher touch sampling rate outweigh the GT 30 5G's higher refresh rate for the majority of users. Only dedicated mobile gamers who prioritize that 144Hz ceiling might favor the Infinix here.

The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X7 Pro runs on the Dimensity 8400 and scores 1,663,422 on AnTuTu, compared to 778,500 for the GT 30 5G's Dimensity 7400 — more than double the benchmark score. In practical terms, this translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking under load, and a noticeably more responsive experience in demanding games and heavy workloads. Both chips are fabbed on a 4 nm process, so the X7 Pro's advantage is architectural rather than a manufacturing generation gap.

The memory picture reinforces this divide. The X7 Pro pairs its chip with 12 GB of RAM and a maximum memory bandwidth of 68.2 GB/s — nearly three times the GT 30 5G's 25.6 GB/s. Higher bandwidth means the CPU and GPU can move data to and from memory far faster, which directly benefits gaming frame rates and image processing tasks. Storage also differs: the X7 Pro ships with 512 GB base storage versus 256 GB on the Infinix, a meaningful difference for users who store large media libraries or games locally.

There is no ambiguity in this category — the Poco X7 Pro wins decisively. Its chipset, benchmark performance, memory bandwidth, and base storage all sit in a higher tier, making it the clear choice for users who demand sustained performance from their device.

At first glance, the Infinix GT 30 5G appears to lead with a 64 MP primary sensor against the Poco X7 Pro's 50 MP — but megapixel count is rarely the full story. The more impactful difference lies in stabilization: the X7 Pro includes optical image stabilization (OIS), while the GT 30 5G does not. OIS makes a tangible difference when shooting handheld video or photos in low light, physically compensating for hand tremor rather than relying on software correction alone. For users who shoot a lot of video or evening photography, this single omission on the Infinix is a notable gap.

The secondary ultra-wide lens also favors the X7 Pro, which offers a wider f/1.5 aperture compared to the GT 30 5G's f/1.9 — a difference that translates to meaningfully more light captured, particularly useful in dim conditions. On the front, the X7 Pro steps up to 20 MP versus 13 MP on the GT 30 5G, giving it more detail headroom for selfies and video calls. The X7 Pro also supports HDR10 video recording, expanding its usefulness for content creators targeting HDR-compatible platforms.

Both cameras share a solid common feature set — phase-detection and laser autofocus, RAW shooting, slow-motion, and 4K 60fps video — so neither is lacking in versatility. But the Poco X7 Pro takes the edge in this category, with OIS, a brighter secondary aperture, a higher-resolution front camera, and HDR10 recording collectively making it the stronger imaging package.

This is a rare case of a complete dead heat. Both the Infinix GT 30 5G and the Poco X7 Pro run Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every measured data point in this category — from privacy controls like location and camera/microphone permissions, to usability features like split-screen, Picture-in-Picture, dynamic theming, and offline voice recognition.

Notably, both devices lack direct OS updates, meaning neither receives updates straight from Google — software support is instead managed through their respective manufacturers. Both also share the same omissions: no cross-site tracking blocking, no Wi-Fi password sharing, no focus modes, and no Quick Start. Since these gaps are identical, they cancel out as a differentiating factor entirely.

Based strictly on the provided specs, this group is a complete tie. Neither device holds any software feature advantage over the other — a buyer's decision here should rest entirely on the other specification categories.

Two strong batteries, but the Poco X7 Pro pulls ahead on both fronts. Its 6000 mAh cell edges out the GT 30 5G's 5500 mAh — a 500 mAh difference that, while not dramatic, does provide a modest buffer for heavier usage days. More significantly, the X7 Pro charges at 90W versus 45W on the Infinix. Twice the charging speed means the X7 Pro can go from low battery to full in roughly half the time, which is a practical advantage for users who are always on the move.

Both phones ship with a charger in the box, support fast charging, and lack wireless charging — so on those points, there is nothing to separate them. The absence of wireless charging on both is worth noting for users who rely on charging pads, but since neither offers it, it does not factor into the comparison.

The Poco X7 Pro wins this category. The larger capacity and substantially faster 90W wired charging combine to give it a meaningful real-world edge — more energy stored and less time spent tethered to a wall outlet.

Wired audio is identical on both devices — neither includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, so wireless listening is the primary path for both. That makes Bluetooth codec support a meaningful differentiator. The Poco X7 Pro supports aptX, aptX HD, and LDAC, while the GT 30 5G supports none of these. For users with high-quality wireless headphones, this matters considerably: LDAC in particular transmits audio at up to three times the bitrate of standard Bluetooth, preserving significantly more detail from lossless or high-resolution audio sources.

For speaker output, both phones offer stereo speakers, so neither has a structural advantage when it comes to built-in audio playback. The one area where the Infinix GT 30 5G holds a unique feature is its built-in FM radio, which the X7 Pro lacks — a niche but occasionally useful capability in areas with strong broadcast coverage or during emergencies.

Overall, the Poco X7 Pro takes the edge here. Its support for LDAC and aptX HD makes it the better choice for anyone investing in quality wireless audio gear, and that advantage outweighs the GT 30 5G's FM radio for most users.

Connectivity parity is the dominant story here — both phones support 5G, Wi-Fi 6, NFC, USB Type-C, dual SIM, fingerprint scanning, GPS with Galileo, and an infrared sensor. For the vast majority of daily use cases, users of either device will have access to the same network capabilities and peripheral features.

The one concrete differentiator is Bluetooth. The Poco X7 Pro ships with Bluetooth 6.0, while the GT 30 5G uses Bluetooth 5.4. Bluetooth 6.0 introduces improved connection reliability and more precise distance estimation between devices, which benefits use cases like wireless audio handoff, accessory pairing stability, and proximity-based features. It is a forward-looking advantage rather than a dramatic day-one difference, but it does mean the X7 Pro is better positioned as the Bluetooth ecosystem evolves.

This category is largely a tie, with the Poco X7 Pro holding a narrow edge through its newer Bluetooth 6.0 standard. Neither device is missing any connectivity feature that the other has in a way that would materially affect most buyers' decisions.

The miscellaneous category offers nothing to separate these two devices. The Infinix GT 30 5G and Poco X7 Pro are identical across every measured data point here — both include a video light, and neither features sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper display.

This is a complete tie. Buyers should look to the other specification categories — particularly performance, display, and camera — to inform their decision, as this group provides no differentiating signal whatsoever.