Infinix GT 30 Pro VS Oppo K13 Turbo

When comparing the design features of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Oppo K13 Turbo, both devices offer some notable differences. The Infinix GT 30 Pro is water resistant with an IP64 rating, while the Oppo K13 Turbo is waterproof with a higher IP67 rating, suggesting slightly better protection against water ingress.

In terms of size and weight, the Infinix GT 30 Pro weighs 189 g and has dimensions of 163.7 mm height, 75.8 mm width, and 8 mm thickness, resulting in a volume of 99.27 cm³. The Oppo K13 Turbo, on the other hand, is slightly heavier at 207 g and has dimensions of 162.8 mm height, 77.2 mm width, and 7.3 mm thickness, with a volume of 91.75 cm³. While the Oppo K13 Turbo is marginally thinner and smaller in volume, it is heavier by 18 g.

Neither device features a rugged build or the ability to fold, ensuring both phones maintain a sleek but durable design. Overall, the Infinix GT 30 Pro offers a larger volume and a more substantial feel, while the Oppo K13 Turbo prioritizes a slightly thinner profile and improved waterproofing.

The display specifications of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Oppo K13 Turbo show a mix of similarities and differences. The Infinix GT 30 Pro features a 6.78″ OLED/AMOLED display with a pixel density of 440 ppi and a resolution of 1224 x 2720 px. In contrast, the Oppo K13 Turbo has a 6.8″ LCD IPS display with a higher pixel density of 453 ppi and a resolution of 1280 x 2800 px, providing slightly more detail in terms of resolution and sharpness.

Both phones have a 120Hz refresh rate, but the Infinix GT 30 Pro stands out with its higher 144Hz refresh rate, providing potentially smoother visuals, especially during fast-paced activities. Both phones share the same touch sampling rate of 240Hz, ensuring responsive touch inputs. Additionally, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro has Always-On Display functionality, the Oppo K13 Turbo does not.

In terms of protection, the Infinix GT 30 Pro comes with branded damage-resistant glass, whereas the Oppo K13 Turbo lacks this feature. Neither device supports HDR10 or HDR10+, nor Dolby Vision, and neither features a secondary screen. Both displays are touchscreens, ensuring standard interactivity.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Oppo K13 Turbo both feature impressive performance specs, but there are several key differences. Both devices offer 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, but their benchmark scores differ. The Infinix GT 30 Pro scores 1,450,000 on AnTuTu, while the Oppo K13 Turbo has a higher score of 1,600,000, indicating a potential difference in overall performance.

Both phones are powered by MediaTek chipsets: the Infinix GT 30 Pro uses the Dimensity 8350, while the Oppo K13 Turbo is equipped with the Dimensity 8450. The CPU speeds vary slightly, with the Infinix GT 30 Pro's CPU reaching 3.35 GHz for one core, and the Oppo K13 Turbo maxing out at 3.25 GHz for one core. Additionally, the Infinix GT 30 Pro has a slightly higher GPU clock speed at 1400 MHz, compared to the Oppo K13 Turbo's 1300 MHz.

Other key differences include RAM speed, where the Infinix GT 30 Pro features faster RAM at 8533 MHz, compared to the Oppo K13 Turbo's 4267 MHz. The Infinix device also has a 4 MB L3 cache per core, while the Oppo K13 Turbo has a slightly larger 6 MB L3 cache per core. Despite these differences, both devices share similar features such as integrated graphics, 64-bit support, and the use of big.LITTLE technology. Both devices also support DirectX 12, have 8 CPU threads, and support a maximum memory of 24GB, with 4 memory channels and a maximum memory bandwidth of 68.2 GB/s.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Oppo K13 Turbo both feature dual-lens main cameras, but there are differences in their configurations. The Infinix GT 30 Pro offers a 108 MP primary camera paired with an 8 MP secondary lens, while the Oppo K13 Turbo has a 50 MP primary camera alongside a 2 MP secondary lens. Both phones feature phase-detection autofocus for photos and continuous autofocus when recording videos, as well as support for slow-motion video recording. Both also allow for 2160 x 60 fps video recording.

The front cameras also differ, with the Infinix GT 30 Pro sporting a 13 MP front-facing camera with a wide aperture of f/2.2, while the Oppo K13 Turbo has a 16 MP front camera with a slightly narrower f/2.4 aperture. Neither front camera has a front-facing LED flash, and neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. However, the Infinix GT 30 Pro offers more advanced manual controls, including manual exposure, manual ISO, and manual focus. The Oppo K13 Turbo lacks support for shooting raw images, unlike the Infinix GT 30 Pro, which does provide raw shooting capability.

Both phones support panorama creation and time-lapse functionality, but the Infinix GT 30 Pro offers additional features such as laser autofocus and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. The Oppo K13 Turbo, on the other hand, lacks laser autofocus and does not shoot 360° panoramas. Both phones include a flash, but the Infinix GT 30 Pro has a dual-tone LED flash with two flash LEDs, while the Oppo K13 Turbo has a single flash LED.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Oppo K13 Turbo both run Android 15 and share many of the same software features. Both devices have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and support theme customization. They also allow blocking app tracking, include on-device machine learning, and have notification and media picker options. Furthermore, both phones support dark mode, offer Wi-Fi password sharing, and have battery health check and extra dim mode features. Neither phone supports direct OS updates or Quick Start functionality.

When it comes to multitasking, both devices support split screen, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and full-page screenshots. Both devices also support widgets, voice commands, and offline voice recognition. Additionally, they both have customizable notifications, dynamic theming, and the ability to offload apps. The child lock feature is available on both devices, as well as tracking the device's current position. Both phones are also multi-user systems, support Live Text, and have sharing intents.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro has a few exclusive features such as the ability to create panoramas in-camera and manual focus on the camera, but these are not directly related to the operating system. There are no major differences in terms of core software features between the two phones based on the provided specs.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Oppo K13 Turbo both feature large batteries, but with notable differences in their capacity and charging capabilities. The Infinix GT 30 Pro is equipped with a 5500 mAh battery, supports wireless charging, and offers a 45W fast charging speed. It also includes reverse wireless charging, allowing you to charge other devices wirelessly. The Oppo K13 Turbo, on the other hand, has a larger 7000 mAh battery, which provides a higher capacity for extended use, but it does not support wireless charging or reverse wireless charging. It does, however, support faster 80W fast charging, which can charge the device more quickly compared to the Infinix model.

Both devices come with a charger included, have non-removable rechargeable batteries, and feature a battery level indicator. Neither device has a removable battery, and both support fast charging, but the Oppo K13 Turbo has the advantage in charging speed with its 80W capacity compared to the 45W offered by the Infinix GT 30 Pro.

Overall, while both phones offer substantial battery capacities and fast charging, the Oppo K13 Turbo focuses on larger battery capacity and faster charging speed, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro provides additional features like wireless and reverse wireless charging.

Both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Oppo K13 Turbo feature stereo speakers, providing an enhanced audio experience, but they differ in a few other aspects. Neither device has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users will need to rely on wireless audio solutions or adapters for wired headphones.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro offers a radio, while the Oppo K13 Turbo does not, so if you enjoy listening to FM radio, the Infinix model is the only option. Both phones do not support aptX, LDAC, or aptX Lossless, but the Oppo K13 Turbo has the advantage of supporting aptX HD, which can provide higher-quality wireless audio streaming over Bluetooth, especially with compatible devices.

In summary, while both phones feature stereo speakers and lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, the Infinix GT 30 Pro stands out with its radio feature, while the Oppo K13 Turbo offers aptX HD for enhanced Bluetooth audio quality.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Oppo K13 Turbo offer a similar set of connectivity and feature specifications. Both devices support 5G and feature dual SIM support, Wi-Fi 4, 5, and 6, and Bluetooth 5.4. They also have USB Type-C ports with USB version 2 and include NFC, fingerprint scanners, and GPS. The phones are equipped with a gyroscope, compass, accelerometer, infrared sensor, and a cellular module. Neither device offers an external memory slot or HDMI output.

In terms of additional features, both phones lack emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, and motion tracking. Neither device includes a stylus or a built-in projector. Both phones support Galileo for satellite positioning, and neither has a barometer or optical tracking capabilities. In short, their connectivity and feature sets are highly comparable across the board.

The main takeaway is that both phones share nearly identical connectivity and feature sets, with no significant differences in the provided specs.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Oppo K13 Turbo both feature a video light, which can help illuminate scenes when recording videos in low-light conditions. However, neither device is equipped with sapphire glass display, curved display, or an e-paper display. These features are not present on either phone based on the provided specifications.

In summary, the Infinix GT 30 Pro and Oppo K13 Turbo are quite similar in this category, with both offering the video light feature but lacking advanced display technologies such as sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.

There are no significant differences between the two products in the miscellaneous features group.