Infinix GT 30 Pro VS Vivo iQOO Neo 10

In terms of physical footprint, these two phones are almost identical twins. Both share the exact same 163.7 mm height and near-equal widths (75.8 mm vs 75.9 mm), with a negligible 0.1 mm difference in thickness (8 mm vs 8.1 mm). In practice, no user would feel any difference in hand. Neither device offers a rugged build or a foldable form factor, so both target the same conventional smartphone audience.

Where a meaningful gap emerges is in two areas: weight and water protection. The Infinix GT 30 Pro is noticeably lighter at 189 g versus the iQOO Neo 10's 206 g — a 17 g difference that, while not dramatic on paper, is perceptible during extended gaming or one-handed use, which matters given both devices target performance-oriented users. On the flip side, the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 holds a clear advantage in water protection: its IP65 rating certifies it against low-pressure water jets from any direction, whereas the Infinix GT 30 Pro's IP64 rating only covers water splashes. In real-world terms, IP65 offers meaningfully more confidence in light rain or accidental sink exposure.

Overall, the two phones trade advantages: the GT 30 Pro is the lighter, more comfortable device for prolonged handling, while the iQOO Neo 10 offers stronger environmental resilience. For users who prioritize daily durability and peace of mind around water, the iQOO Neo 10 has the edge; for those who value a lighter feel during intensive use, the GT 30 Pro wins out.

At the foundation, both phones are remarkably well-matched: identical 6.78″ OLED/AMOLED panels with a smooth 144Hz refresh rate and Always-On Display support. For everyday use and gaming, this common ground means neither phone has a structural disadvantage in screen size or motion fluidity.

The differences, however, are worth unpacking. The iQOO Neo 10 pulls ahead on sharpness with a 453 ppi pixel density versus the GT 30 Pro's 440 ppi — a gap that is technically measurable but unlikely to be noticeable to most eyes at typical viewing distances. More consequential is the HDR story: the iQOO Neo 10 supports both HDR10 and HDR10+, meaning compatible streaming content on Netflix or YouTube will render with greater dynamic range, deeper shadows, and more vivid highlights. The GT 30 Pro lacks any HDR certification, which is a tangible omission for media consumption. Conversely, the GT 30 Pro counters with branded damage-resistant glass — a real-world durability advantage that the iQOO Neo 10 does not offer, making accidental drops less likely to result in a cracked screen.

Taken together, the two displays trade meaningful advantages: the iQOO Neo 10 is the stronger choice for visual fidelity and premium content playback, while the GT 30 Pro offers better physical screen protection. For users who stream a lot of video, the iQOO Neo 10 has the clear display edge; for those who prioritize screen durability, the GT 30 Pro's glass protection tips the balance back.

The chipset gap here is substantial and consequential. The iQOO Neo 10 runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the GT 30 Pro uses the Dimensity 8350 — both etched on a 4 nm process, but performing in different leagues. The AnTuTu scores tell the story bluntly: 2,135,100 versus 1,450,000, a roughly 47% advantage for the iQOO Neo 10. Geekbench 6 confirms the trend, with the Neo 10 posting a 2041 single-core and 6833 multi-core result against the GT 30 Pro's 1536 and 4700 respectively. In practical terms, this translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking under heavy load, and a more capable experience in CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or prolonged gaming sessions.

GPU performance adds another dimension to consider. The GT 30 Pro's Mali G615 MC6 runs at a higher clock speed (1400 MHz), while the Neo 10's Adreno 825 operates at 1150 MHz — but raw clock speed is not the whole picture for GPUs, as architecture efficiency matters enormously. The Neo 10 also holds a clear edge in memory bandwidth at 76.8 GB/s versus 68.2 GB/s, and doubles the L3 cache at 8 MB compared to 4 MB, both of which reduce latency in data-heavy workloads. The GT 30 Pro does ship with faster RAM at 8533 MHz, though the Neo 10's 16 GB of RAM versus 12 GB provides more headroom for demanding multitasking scenarios.

Across virtually every performance metric provided, the iQOO Neo 10 holds a clear and meaningful advantage. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is a demonstrably more powerful platform, and the combination of higher benchmark scores, greater RAM, wider memory bandwidth, and a larger L3 cache makes it the stronger performer for users who push their phones hard.

Megapixel counts grab attention, but they rarely tell the whole story. The GT 30 Pro leads with a 108 MP primary sensor versus the iQOO Neo 10's 50 MP — a significant number on paper, but the Neo 10 counters with something arguably more impactful in everyday shooting: optical image stabilization (OIS). OIS physically compensates for hand movement during capture, which meaningfully reduces blur in low-light stills and produces smoother handheld video. The GT 30 Pro has no OIS, which puts it at a real disadvantage for anyone who shoots frequently in dim environments or records video without a tripod. Both phones cap video at 2160p @ 60 fps, so the OIS gap becomes especially relevant during handheld 4K recording.

The selfie camera gap is equally hard to ignore. The iQOO Neo 10 offers a 32 MP front sensor versus the GT 30 Pro's 13 MP — a difference that directly impacts portrait detail and video call quality. The GT 30 Pro does fight back in a few niche areas: it includes laser autofocus for faster, more confident locking in challenging conditions, shoots in RAW format for users who post-process their images, and has a wider front aperture at f/2.2 compared to the Neo 10's f/2.5, which allows slightly more light in selfie shots.

Weighing it all, the GT 30 Pro's higher main sensor resolution and RAW support appeal to enthusiasts who want flexibility in editing, but the iQOO Neo 10's combination of OIS and a 32 MP front camera delivers more practical, day-to-day photographic value for the broader audience. The iQOO Neo 10 holds the camera edge overall, particularly for video shooters and selfie-focused users.

Rarely does a spec group produce a result this definitive: based on the provided data, the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 are in a complete tie on operating system features. Both ship with Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every tracked attribute — from privacy controls like location and camera/microphone permissions, to usability features like split-screen multitasking, Picture-in-Picture, dynamic theming, and offline voice recognition.

The shared foundation is a capable one. Both devices support on-device machine learning, customizable notifications, battery health monitoring, and an extra dim mode — a quality-of-life feature useful for low-light or accessibility scenarios. Notably, neither phone receives direct OS updates from Google, meaning updates are mediated through each manufacturer's own release schedule, which is a minor but common consideration for Android users who prioritize timely security patches.

There is simply no differentiator to call out here. Every feature present on one device is equally present on the other, and no omissions skew the balance in either direction. This category is an exact draw — a buyer's OS experience will be functionally identical between these two phones based on the available data.

Battery is where the iQOO Neo 10 makes one of its most compelling arguments. Its 7000 mAh cell dwarfs the GT 30 Pro's already-respectable 5500 mAh — a 27% larger reservoir that, in practical terms, translates to significantly more screen-on time between charges. For heavy users, gamers, or anyone who frequently ends the day in the red, that extra capacity is a genuine quality-of-life upgrade rather than a spec-sheet footnote.

Charging speed flips the dynamic further in the Neo 10's favor. Its 120W fast charging is nearly three times faster than the GT 30 Pro's 45W, meaning a much larger battery can be refilled in a fraction of the time. In real-world terms, a 7000 mAh cell at 120W can realistically reach a full charge in well under an hour — a combination of capacity and speed that makes range anxiety largely irrelevant. The GT 30 Pro counters with one exclusive feature: wireless charging, which the Neo 10 entirely lacks. For users who rely on Qi pads at a desk or bedside, this is a genuine convenience advantage.

The trade-off is clear but lopsided. Wireless charging is a comfort feature; raw battery life and ultra-fast wired charging are endurance fundamentals. The iQOO Neo 10 holds a strong overall battery advantage — its larger capacity and dramatically faster charging outweigh the GT 30 Pro's wireless charging convenience for most users, unless cord-free topping up is a non-negotiable priority.

Audio is largely a shared story between these two phones. Both drop the 3.5 mm headphone jack — an increasingly common omission that pushes users toward Bluetooth or USB-C audio — and both feature stereo speakers, which is the most impactful audio spec for media consumption and gaming. Neither device supports high-resolution Bluetooth codecs like aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, or aptX Adaptive, meaning wireless audio quality is capped at standard levels for both, regardless of how capable your headphones might be.

The only differentiator in this group is the GT 30 Pro's inclusion of a built-in FM radio, which the iQOO Neo 10 lacks entirely. This is a niche feature in the streaming era, but it holds genuine value in regions with unreliable internet connectivity, during emergencies, or simply for users who prefer local broadcast content without consuming mobile data.

For most users, audio performance between these two phones is effectively tied — both offer stereo sound and identical wireless audio codec support. The GT 30 Pro edges ahead by a narrow margin thanks to its FM radio, but only for users who would actually use it. Those indifferent to that feature will find no meaningful audio distinction between the two devices.

Connectivity between these two phones is broadly identical — both support 5G, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, USB Type-C, dual SIM, and the same sensor suite including gyroscope, compass, accelerometer, infrared sensor, and GPS with Galileo support. For the vast majority of connection scenarios, users of either phone will have the same experience.

The one concrete differentiator is Wi-Fi. The iQOO Neo 10 supports Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) in addition to Wi-Fi 4, 5, and 6, while the GT 30 Pro tops out at Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax). Wi-Fi 7 delivers significantly higher theoretical throughput, lower latency, and better performance in congested multi-device environments — advantages that matter most in homes or offices with many connected devices, or when transferring large files wirelessly. It also provides a degree of future-proofing as Wi-Fi 7 routers become more widespread. That said, the practical benefit today depends entirely on whether the user already has or plans to upgrade to a Wi-Fi 7 router.

With that single exception, this category is essentially a draw in terms of day-to-day utility. However, for users who want to maximize their wireless networking potential now or in the near future, the iQOO Neo 10 holds a modest but clear edge by virtue of its Wi-Fi 7 support.

The miscellaneous spec group offers no differentiating data between these two phones. Both include a video light, and neither features a sapphire glass display, curved screen, or e-paper display — every tracked attribute is identical across the board.

This is an unambiguous tie. Based solely on the provided data, there is nothing in this category that gives either the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 any advantage over the other. Buyers should weigh other spec groups to inform their decision.