Infinix GT 30 Pro VS Vivo iQOO Neo 10

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 have a similar overall design in terms of size, with both having the same height of 163.7 mm. However, the iQOO Neo 10 is slightly heavier at 206 g, compared to the Infinix GT 30 Pro’s 189 g. The thickness of both phones is close, with the Infinix GT 30 Pro measuring 8 mm and the iQOO Neo 10 being marginally thicker at 8.1 mm. When it comes to width, the differences are minimal as well, with the Infinix GT 30 Pro being 75.8 mm wide, just a fraction smaller than the iQOO Neo 10 at 75.9 mm.

In terms of water resistance, the Infinix GT 30 Pro has a water-resistant rating of IP64, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 has a higher waterproof rating of IP65. Both phones do not feature rugged builds and are not foldable, and both phones have a similar overall volume—99.27 cm³ for the Infinix GT 30 Pro and 100.64 cm³ for the Vivo iQOO Neo 10.

Both phones share similar design elements but differ slightly in terms of weight, thickness, and water resistance, with the iQOO Neo 10 offering a higher level of protection with its IP65 rating and slightly more volume and weight.

Both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 feature OLED/AMOLED displays and have the same screen size of 6.78 inches. The pixel density differs slightly, with the iQOO Neo 10 offering a higher 453 ppi compared to the Infinix GT 30 Pro’s 440 ppi. The resolution also varies, with the Infinix GT 30 Pro having 1224 x 2720 px and the iQOO Neo 10 offering a slightly higher 1260 x 2800 px.

Both phones support a 144Hz refresh rate, providing smooth visuals. The Infinix GT 30 Pro comes with branded damage-resistant glass, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 does not have this feature. Regarding HDR support, the iQOO Neo 10 supports both HDR10 and HDR10+, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro does not support either. Additionally, both devices feature an Always-On Display, but only the iQOO Neo 10 supports HDR10 and HDR10+.

Neither phone features Dolby Vision or a secondary screen, and both have touchscreens. Overall, both displays are similar in size and refresh rate, but the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 offers a higher pixel density, resolution, and enhanced HDR support, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro stands out with branded damage-resistant glass.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 10 both come with 512GB of internal storage, offering ample space for apps and media. However, the iQOO Neo 10 has a larger RAM capacity at 16GB, compared to the 12GB of RAM in the Infinix GT 30 Pro. This difference in RAM is accompanied by a notable performance gap in benchmark scores, with the iQOO Neo 10 achieving an AnTuTu score of 2,135,100, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro scores 1,450,000.

Both phones feature high-performance chipsets: the Infinix GT 30 Pro is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. The CPU speeds differ slightly as well, with the Infinix GT 30 Pro having a combination of cores running at speeds up to 3.35 GHz, while the iQOO Neo 10’s CPU runs at up to 3.21 GHz, but with a different configuration of cores.

In terms of GPU, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is equipped with a Mali G615 MC6 running at 1400 MHz, while the iQOO Neo 10 uses the Adreno 825 GPU, clocked at 1150 MHz. The iQOO Neo 10 has slightly better multi-core performance, as evidenced by its Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 6833 compared to the Infinix GT 30 Pro’s 4700, and its single-core score is also higher at 2041 vs 1536. Both phones support 64-bit processing and share similar features, including integrated LTE, DirectX 12, big.LITTLE technology, integrated graphics, TrustZone, and OpenCL version 2. They both also support up to 24GB of RAM, but the iQOO Neo 10 has a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s compared to the Infinix GT 30 Pro’s 68.2 GB/s, and the iQOO Neo 10 also benefits from a larger L3 cache of 8MB, compared to the Infinix GT 30 Pro’s 4MB.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 10 both feature dual-lens main cameras, with the Infinix offering a 108 MP + 8 MP combination and the iQOO Neo 10 using a 50 MP + 8 MP setup. The Infinix camera has a wider aperture of f/2.2 for the main lens and f/1.9 for the secondary lens, while the iQOO Neo 10 has an aperture of f/2.2 and f/1.8 for the main and secondary lenses, respectively.

For the front cameras, the Infinix GT 30 Pro has a 13 MP front-facing camera with a wide aperture of f/2.2, whereas the iQOO Neo 10 has a higher 32 MP front camera with a slightly narrower f/2.5 aperture. Both phones support video recording at 2160 x 60 fps with continuous autofocus for video, phase-detection autofocus for photos, slow-motion video recording, and a built-in HDR mode.

Both devices feature a flash, but the Infinix GT 30 Pro has a dual-tone LED flash with two LEDs, while the iQOO Neo 10 only has a single LED. The Infinix model also has laser autofocus, which the iQOO Neo 10 lacks. In terms of extra features, the Infinix GT 30 Pro supports raw photo shooting and panorama creation, while the iQOO Neo 10 does not support raw shooting but also allows panorama creation. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash, and both support timelapse and serial shot modes.

Both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 run Android 15 and offer very similar operating system features. They both have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. Both phones also support dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health check, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode.

Additional features like media picker, notification permissions, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and multi-user system are also available on both devices. Both phones allow app offloading, have sharing intents, support widgets, and track the current position of the device. However, there are a few minor differences. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash or supports HDR10 recording, but both have essential features like focus modes, child locks, and the ability to use the devices as a PC.

One notable point is that both devices do not receive direct OS updates, and neither supports Quick Start. Both devices share the same Android version and have virtually identical features, which means there’s little to differentiate the operating systems between the two, aside from the identical specifications and shared capabilities.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 10 differ in battery capacities. The Infinix GT 30 Pro is equipped with a 5500 mAh battery, while the iQOO Neo 10 has a larger 7000 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the iQOO Neo 10 offers a much faster charging speed at 120W compared to the Infinix GT 30 Pro’s 45W. However, the Infinix GT 30 Pro supports wireless charging, while the iQOO Neo 10 does not.

Both phones come with a charger included, and neither has a removable battery. They also both feature a battery level indicator and a rechargeable battery, which are standard across both devices. Additionally, the iQOO Neo 10 does not support wireless charging, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro includes this feature, giving it an edge in terms of charging convenience.

Overall, the iQOO Neo 10 has a larger battery capacity and faster charging speed, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro stands out with its wireless charging support.

Both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 10 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on Bluetooth or USB-C for wired audio connections. Both devices feature stereo speakers for enhanced audio output. However, when it comes to audio codec support, neither phone supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, which means they do not offer advanced Bluetooth audio features.

The Infinix GT 30 Pro stands out by including a radio, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 does not have this feature. This gives the Infinix model an edge for users who still enjoy listening to FM or other radio stations.

In summary, the audio features are similar across both phones, with stereo speakers, no 3.5 mm jack, and no advanced Bluetooth audio codecs. The key difference is that the Infinix GT 30 Pro includes a radio, a feature absent on the Vivo iQOO Neo 10.

Both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 10 offer 5G support, ensuring fast mobile connectivity. They also both feature dual SIM slots, NFC, and fingerprint scanners. The Wi-Fi capabilities are similar, with both supporting Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), but the iQOO Neo 10 has the added advantage of supporting the newer Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), while the Infinix GT 30 Pro does not.

In terms of Bluetooth, both devices use version 5.4. Both phones come with USB Type-C ports, but they share the same USB version (2.0). Neither device has an external memory slot, and both are equipped with essential sensors like gyroscopes, accelerometers, infrared sensors, GPS, and compasses. Neither phone supports ANT+, has a heart rate monitor, or includes a barometer, HDMI output, or 3D facial recognition.

Additional features such as motion tracking, optical tracking, and a built-in projector are absent on both devices. However, both phones support Galileo for satellite navigation and share similar connectivity features overall. The key difference here is the iQOO Neo 10's support for Wi-Fi 7, which the Infinix GT 30 Pro lacks.

Both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 feature a video light, allowing for improved lighting during video recording or shooting in low-light environments. Neither device includes sapphire glass for the display, meaning they don’t have the added scratch resistance that sapphire glass provides. Both phones also have a standard flat display, as neither includes a curved display. Additionally, neither phone offers an e-paper display, which is typically used for devices focusing on energy efficiency or readability in bright conditions.

In summary, the Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 10 are very similar in the miscellaneous features section, with both devices sharing the same video light, lack of sapphire glass, absence of curved displays, and no e-paper display.