Infinix GT 30 Pro VS Vivo iQOO Z10

In terms of physical form factor, these two phones are remarkably close. Both share nearly identical footprints — the Infinix GT 30 Pro measures 163.7 × 75.8 × 8 mm while the Vivo iQOO Z10 comes in at 163.4 × 76.4 × 7.9 mm — a difference so marginal it would be imperceptible in hand. Neither device folds or carries a rugged build designation, placing them squarely in the mainstream smartphone category.

Where design specs diverge meaningfully is in weight and, more importantly, water protection. The GT 30 Pro is 10 g lighter at 189 g versus the iQOO Z10's 199 g — a small but noticeable advantage during extended one-handed use or long gaming sessions. However, the iQOO Z10 counters with a significantly superior IP68 rating compared to the GT 30 Pro's IP64. This is not a trivial distinction: IP64 means protection against dust and water splashes from any direction, while IP68 certifies full submersion resistance — typically up to 1.5 m of water for 30 minutes. In practice, this means the iQOO Z10 can survive accidental drops in water, while the GT 30 Pro can only handle rain or splashes.

Overall, the iQOO Z10 holds a clear edge in this group due to its superior water protection rating. The GT 30 Pro's weight advantage is real but modest, and for most users, the peace of mind that comes with IP68 submersion resistance outweighs a 10 g difference on the scale.

Both phones use OLED/AMOLED panels at virtually the same screen size — 6.78″ vs 6.77″ — so the real competition here comes down to sharpness, smoothness, and brightness. The GT 30 Pro pulls ahead on resolution and pixel density, offering 1224 × 2720 px at 440 ppi compared to the iQOO Z10's 1080 × 2392 px at 388 ppi. That 52 ppi gap is perceptible — text and fine detail will render more crisply on the GT 30 Pro, which matters for reading, UI elements, and gaming visuals up close.

The iQOO Z10 fights back decisively on two fronts: refresh rate and brightness. A 120Hz panel is fluid for everyday use, but the GT 30 Pro's 144Hz delivers a tangibly smoother experience in fast-paced games and quick scrolling — a meaningful advantage given the GT 30 Pro's gaming-oriented positioning. Brightness, however, tells a different story: the iQOO Z10's 1300 nits typical brightness dwarfs the GT 30 Pro's 700 nits, nearly doubling it. In direct sunlight, this translates to far better legibility outdoors. The GT 30 Pro also includes branded damage-resistant glass while the iQOO Z10 does not — a durability perk worth noting. Both support Always-On Display and neither offers HDR10+ or Dolby Vision.

This group ends in a split decision that depends heavily on use case. For gaming and sheer pixel-level detail, the GT 30 Pro has the edge. For outdoor visibility and everyday brightness, the iQOO Z10 holds a commanding lead. Users who spend significant time in bright environments will likely find the iQOO Z10's display more practical, while display-quality enthusiasts and gamers will appreciate the GT 30 Pro's higher resolution and refresh rate.

The performance gap between these two phones is substantial and consistent across every meaningful metric. The GT 30 Pro's MediaTek Dimensity 8350 chip scores 1,450,000 on AnTuTu — nearly double the iQOO Z10's 823,249 on its Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. This isn't a rounding error; it reflects a genuinely different tier of processing capability. Geekbench 6 confirms the pattern, with the GT 30 Pro leading in both single-core (1536 vs 1162) and multi-core (4700 vs 3239) results. In real-world terms, this translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and more headroom for demanding games and workloads.

The architectural advantages run deeper than raw clock speeds. The GT 30 Pro's GPU runs at 1400 MHz versus the iQOO Z10's 1050 MHz, and its memory bandwidth is a striking 68.2 GB/s compared to just 25.6 GB/s — meaning data flows to the processor far more freely, reducing bottlenecks in graphics-intensive tasks. RAM speed further reinforces this: 8533 MHz on the GT 30 Pro versus 3200 MHz on the iQOO Z10. Both phones share the same 4 nm process node and 12 GB of base RAM, but the GT 30 Pro supports up to 24 GB maximum memory versus the iQOO Z10's 16 GB ceiling — an advantage for users who push their devices hard over time.

Storage is another dimension where the GT 30 Pro stands apart, offering 512 GB versus the iQOO Z10's 256 GB. Taken together, the GT 30 Pro holds a clear and decisive performance advantage in this group across compute, graphics, memory throughput, and storage — making it the stronger choice for power users and mobile gamers without ambiguity.

The rear camera systems take very different approaches. The GT 30 Pro leads with a 108 MP primary sensor paired with an 8 MP secondary, while the iQOO Z10 opts for a more modest 50 MP main lens alongside a 2 MP depth sensor. Raw megapixel count doesn't tell the whole story, but the GT 30 Pro's higher-resolution sensor does offer more flexibility for cropping and retaining detail in well-lit shots. The iQOO Z10 counters with a crucial hardware advantage though: optical image stabilization (OIS), which the GT 30 Pro lacks entirely. OIS actively compensates for hand shake during handheld shooting and low-light photography, often making a more meaningful difference to image quality than extra megapixels alone.

For video, the GT 30 Pro reclaims ground by supporting 4K at 60 fps versus the iQOO Z10's 4K at 30 fps ceiling — a genuine advantage for anyone who shoots action or wants smoother cinematic footage. The GT 30 Pro also adds laser autofocus and a dual-tone, dual-LED flash, both of which contribute to faster, more accurate subject locking and truer color rendering in flash photography. Flipping to the front, the positions reverse sharply: the iQOO Z10 packs a 32 MP selfie camera with a wider f/2.0 aperture, compared to the GT 30 Pro's 13 MP shooter at f/2.2 — a meaningful gap for selfie quality and low-light self-portraits.

This group is a genuine trade-off with no single winner. The GT 30 Pro edges ahead for video and rear photography versatility thanks to 4K/60fps, higher resolution, laser AF, and better flash hardware. The iQOO Z10 holds the advantage for stabilized photography and selfies, courtesy of OIS and its superior front camera. The right choice depends on whether the user prioritizes rear video and detail capture or front-camera quality and shake-free stills.

Rarely does a spec group produce such a clean result: the Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10 are identical across every single operating system specification provided. Both ship with Android 15, support the same privacy controls — including location, camera, and microphone permissions — and share the full set of usability features: dark mode, dynamic theming, split-screen multitasking, Picture-in-Picture, customizable notifications, widgets, and offline voice recognition, among others.

This is a complete tie in this group. Neither phone gets direct OS updates, neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing or focus modes, and both check every other feature box in lockstep. There is no differentiator here — not even a minor one — based strictly on the provided data.

Battery is where the iQOO Z10 makes its most emphatic statement in this comparison. Its 7300 mAh cell is a genuinely massive capacity — roughly a third larger than the GT 30 Pro's already-respectable 5500 mAh. That 1800 mAh difference is not marginal; in practice, it can translate to an additional several hours of screen-on time, making the iQOO Z10 a compelling option for heavy users, travellers, or anyone who regularly goes a full day and beyond without access to a charger.

Wired charging further favors the iQOO Z10, which supports 90W fast charging versus the GT 30 Pro's 45W. Doubling the wattage means significantly shorter top-up times — a larger battery that also charges faster is a notable practical advantage. The GT 30 Pro reclaims one point by offering wireless charging, a convenience feature the iQOO Z10 omits entirely. For users who rely on wireless pads at a desk or bedside, this absence on the iQOO Z10 is a genuine trade-off to consider.

On balance, the iQOO Z10 holds a clear overall edge in this group. The combination of a much larger battery and faster wired charging outweighs the GT 30 Pro's wireless charging capability for most users. The GT 30 Pro's wireless charging is a meaningful perk, but it does not offset the iQOO Z10's substantial longevity and replenishment advantages.

Audio is a short but pointed comparison. Neither phone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack or any high-resolution Bluetooth codec — no aptX, LDAC, or their variants — so wired audio enthusiasts and wireless audiophiles are equally underserved by both devices. From that baseline, however, the GT 30 Pro pulls meaningfully ahead.

The GT 30 Pro features stereo speakers, while the iQOO Z10 offers only a mono setup. For media consumption — streaming video, gaming, or casual music listening — stereo speakers deliver noticeably wider, more immersive sound and better channel separation. The difference is immediately perceptible when watching content or playing games without headphones. The GT 30 Pro also includes a built-in FM radio, a niche but genuinely useful feature in areas with unreliable data connectivity; the iQOO Z10 has no radio at all.

The GT 30 Pro wins this group clearly. Stereo speakers alone would settle it, but the addition of FM radio makes the gap even more one-sided. The iQOO Z10 has no audio hardware advantage to offer in return based on the provided specs.

The shared foundation here is solid: both phones support 5G, dual SIM, USB Type-C, GPS with Galileo, an infrared sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer, compass, and a fingerprint scanner. For most everyday connectivity needs, users of either device will find themselves equally well-equipped. The differences, however, are focused and consequential.

The GT 30 Pro steps ahead on three fronts. First, it supports Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), while the iQOO Z10 tops out at Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) — Wi-Fi 6 offers better performance in congested environments, lower latency, and improved efficiency, which matters in busy households or public spaces. Second, the GT 30 Pro carries Bluetooth 5.4 versus the iQOO Z10's 5.2 — a newer version with incremental improvements to connection stability and efficiency. Third, and most practically significant, the GT 30 Pro includes NFC while the iQOO Z10 does not. NFC enables contactless payments, quick device pairing, and transit card functionality — its absence on the iQOO Z10 is a meaningful omission for users in markets where tap-to-pay is routine.

The GT 30 Pro wins this group on the strength of its Wi-Fi 6 support and NFC capability in particular. The iQOO Z10 holds no connectivity advantage in return based on the provided specs, making this a one-sided outcome despite both devices sharing a strong common baseline.

The Miscellaneous group offers nothing to separate these two phones. Every specified feature — video light, display type characteristics, and premium glass — lands identically for both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10. Neither features sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper panel, and both include a video light. This is a complete tie with no differentiator present in the provided data.