Infinix GT 30 Pro VS Vivo T4 Ultra 5G

Both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G share the same IP64 ingress protection rating, meaning neither is rugged-built nor foldable, but both offer a degree of dust and water resistance sufficient for everyday splashes and light rain. This puts them on equal footing for durability in typical use scenarios.

Where they diverge is in their physical footprint. The Vivo T4 Ultra is meaningfully more compact across all three dimensions — it is 0.5 mm thinner, 3.1 mm shorter, and 0.8 mm narrower than the GT 30 Pro. The cumulative effect is significant: the T4 Ultra's total volume of 90.34 cm³ is roughly 9% smaller than the GT 30 Pro's 99.27 cm³. In the hand, that translates to a noticeably more pocket-friendly and one-hand-friendly form factor. The GT 30 Pro is marginally lighter at 189 g versus 192 g, but a 3 g difference is imperceptible in daily use.

Overall, the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G holds a clear edge in design compactness. Its slimmer and shorter profile makes it the more ergonomic choice for users who prioritize comfortable handling and portability, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro offers no meaningful design advantage to offset its larger dimensions.

Both phones use an OLED/AMOLED panel and support Always-On Display, so the baseline screen quality is strong on either side. The Infinix GT 30 Pro goes larger at 6.78″ with a 144Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo T4 Ultra opts for a slightly smaller 6.67″ panel running at 120Hz. In practice, the GT 30 Pro's higher refresh rate delivers marginally smoother scrolling and more responsive gaming visuals, though the difference between 144Hz and 120Hz is subtle and most users would only notice it in direct side-by-side comparisons.

The more consequential gap lies in brightness. The T4 Ultra's 1600 nits typical brightness dwarfs the GT 30 Pro's 700 nits — more than double. This is a real-world differentiator: under direct sunlight or in bright outdoor environments, the T4 Ultra will remain clearly legible while the GT 30 Pro may struggle. The T4 Ultra also edges ahead in sharpness, with a pixel density of 460 ppi versus 440 ppi, and a slightly higher resolution of 1260 x 2800 px compared to 1224 x 2720 px, though both are sharp enough that the difference is negligible to the naked eye.

On the flip side, the GT 30 Pro ships with branded damage-resistant glass — an advantage the T4 Ultra lacks — offering better protection against everyday scratches and accidental drops onto hard surfaces. Weighing everything together, the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G holds the stronger display edge overall, primarily due to its dramatically superior brightness making it far more versatile in varied lighting conditions. The GT 30 Pro's higher refresh rate and screen protection offer some compensation, but they don't outweigh the brightness deficit.

The chipset gap here is substantial. The Vivo T4 Ultra runs on the Dimensity 9300 Plus, a flagship-tier SoC, while the Infinix GT 30 Pro is powered by the Dimensity 8350, a upper-mid-range chip. The benchmarks reflect this hierarchy clearly: the T4 Ultra scores 2,136,863 on AnTuTu versus 1,450,000 for the GT 30 Pro — nearly a 47% lead. Geekbench 6 tells the same story, with the T4 Ultra pulling ahead in both single-core (2302 vs 1536) and multi-core (7547 vs 4700) results. In real-world terms, this translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking under load, and noticeably better performance in computationally intensive tasks like video editing or high-fidelity gaming.

The GPU comparison reinforces this divide. The T4 Ultra's Immortalis-G720 MC12 is a 12-core part from a higher GPU tier, compared to the GT 30 Pro's Mali G615 MC6. For gaming and graphics rendering, the T4 Ultra is in a different league. Its advantage is further supported by a much larger L3 cache of 18 MB versus just 4 MB on the GT 30 Pro — a larger cache reduces latency in sustained workloads and keeps the CPU fed with data more efficiently. The T4 Ultra also leads in peak memory bandwidth at 76.8 GB/s versus 68.2 GB/s, though the GT 30 Pro counters with faster raw RAM speed at 8533 MHz versus 4800 MHz — a nuance that has limited practical impact given the T4 Ultra's broader architectural advantages.

The Vivo T4 Ultra 5G wins this category decisively. Both phones share the same storage, RAM capacity, process node, and memory generation, so the playing field is level on those fronts — but the T4 Ultra's flagship chipset, superior GPU, and massively larger L3 cache give it a commanding performance advantage that users will feel in demanding daily use.

The camera systems here reflect two different philosophies. The Infinix GT 30 Pro leads with a high-resolution 108 MP primary sensor, which allows for aggressive cropping in post without significant detail loss, alongside an 8 MP secondary lens. The Vivo T4 Ultra counters with a triple-camera setup — 50 MP + 50 MP + 8 MP — where the second 50 MP sensor serves as a dedicated telephoto with 3x optical zoom. True optical zoom is a meaningful real-world advantage: it captures distant subjects with far greater clarity than digital cropping, making the T4 Ultra considerably more versatile for travel and portrait photography at range.

Stabilization is another area where the T4 Ultra pulls ahead. Its optical image stabilization (OIS) compensates for hand movement during both photos and video, resulting in sharper low-light shots and smoother handheld footage — something the GT 30 Pro entirely lacks. The tradeoff is in video resolution: the GT 30 Pro can record 4K at 60 fps, versus the T4 Ultra's cap of 4K at 30 fps. For users who shoot action or need fluid high-frame-rate footage, the GT 30 Pro's video ceiling is a genuine advantage. The GT 30 Pro also includes laser autofocus, which can improve focus speed and accuracy in low-light conditions — a feature absent on the T4 Ultra.

For selfies, the T4 Ultra's 32 MP front camera handily outresolves the GT 30 Pro's 13 MP shooter, producing more detailed self-portraits and enabling better digital zoom for video calls. On balance, the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G holds the stronger overall camera edge, thanks to its optical zoom, OIS, and superior front camera. The GT 30 Pro's 4K@60fps capability keeps it relevant for videographers, but the T4 Ultra covers more ground for the typical photography user.

This is a rare case of a complete dead heat. Every single operating system feature in the provided data is identical between the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G — both ship with Android 15, and their feature sets match point for point across privacy controls, customization options, and productivity tools.

Notably, both support practical everyday features like split-screen multitasking, Picture-in-Picture, dynamic theming, on-device machine learning, and offline voice recognition. On the privacy front, both offer camera and microphone access controls, location privacy options, and app tracking blocks — a solid baseline for security-conscious users. Neither device receives direct OS updates from Google, meaning updates are routed through the manufacturer, which can introduce delays.

Given the complete feature parity across all provided specs, this category is an exact tie. Neither phone holds any software advantage over the other based on the available data, and a buyer's decision here should rest entirely on the differences identified in other specification groups.

Capacity is a wash — both the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G pack a 5500 mAh battery, so neither holds an endurance advantage on paper. The meaningful split comes down to how quickly each can recover that charge. The T4 Ultra's 90W fast charging is exactly double the GT 30 Pro's 45W — a difference users will feel every morning or during a midday top-up, as the T4 Ultra can realistically reach a full charge in roughly half the time.

The GT 30 Pro strikes back with wireless charging support, a convenience the T4 Ultra entirely lacks. For users who rely on a bedside or desk pad charger, this is a genuine quality-of-life feature — simply placing the phone down without fumbling for a cable adds meaningful everyday convenience, even if wireless charging is inherently slower than wired.

This category comes down to a direct trade-off rather than a clear winner. The Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is the better choice for users who prioritize speed — getting back to 100% as fast as possible. The Infinix GT 30 Pro suits those who value charging flexibility and the cable-free convenience of wireless. Neither phone has an edge in raw battery capacity, so your preference between fast wired charging and wireless charging should be the deciding factor here.

Audio hardware is largely matched between these two phones. Both drop the 3.5mm headphone jack — so wired audio requires an adapter or USB-C headphones on either device — and both feature stereo speakers, which deliver a wider, more immersive soundstage compared to mono setups, particularly for media consumption and gaming. Neither device supports any high-resolution Bluetooth audio codec, meaning aptX, LDAC, and their variants are absent on both sides.

The one differentiator in this category is the Infinix GT 30 Pro's inclusion of a built-in FM radio, a feature the Vivo T4 Ultra lacks entirely. While radio may seem like a legacy feature, it remains genuinely useful in areas with limited data connectivity, during emergencies, or simply for users who prefer live broadcast content without consuming mobile data.

For the vast majority of users, this category is effectively a tie in terms of day-to-day audio experience. However, the GT 30 Pro earns a narrow edge by offering FM radio — a small but real addition for those who would actually use it, and a non-factor for those who wouldn't.

Across the core connectivity stack, these two phones are virtually identical. Both support 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, and dual SIM — a well-rounded foundation that covers fast wireless connectivity, contactless payments, and flexible carrier options. USB Type-C at USB 2.0 speeds is shared by both, meaning neither supports fast data transfers or video output over cable, which is a mild limitation at this price tier but equally applicable to both devices.

The only differentiator in this entire category is the Infinix GT 30 Pro's infrared (IR) blaster, which the Vivo T4 Ultra lacks. An IR blaster lets the phone act as a universal remote control for TVs, air conditioners, and other home appliances — a niche but genuinely useful feature for users who want to consolidate their remote controls into a single device. It costs nothing in daily use if ignored, but adds real convenience for those who rely on it.

This category is nearly a tie, with the Infinix GT 30 Pro claiming a slim edge solely by virtue of its IR blaster. For users who value smart home or appliance control from their phone, that inclusion tips the scales; for everyone else, connectivity parity means neither phone has a meaningful advantage here.

The miscellaneous specs for the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G are an exact match across every data point provided. Both include a video light, and neither features sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper panel — so there is nothing in this category that distinguishes one device from the other.

This is a complete tie. Buyers should look to the other specification groups — particularly performance, display, and cameras — to inform their decision, as this category offers no differentiating signal whatsoever.