Infinix Hot 60i 5G VS Tecno Spark 40

The Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 are similar in terms of their design, offering water resistance and the same Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP64. Both devices are protected from dust and water splashes, but neither is fully waterproof.

When it comes to dimensions, both phones have a thickness of 7.7 mm, making them equally slim. The Infinix Hot 60i 5G is slightly narrower with a width of 76.6 mm, while the Tecno Spark 40 is marginally wider at 77 mm. The height of the two devices is very close, with the Infinix Hot 60i 5G measuring 166 mm and the Tecno Spark 40 at 165.6 mm, indicating almost identical sizes.

The volume of the two phones also reflects their comparable sizes. The Infinix Hot 60i 5G has a volume of 97.91 cm³, while the Tecno Spark 40 is slightly larger at 98.18 cm³. Neither phone features a rugged build or the ability to fold, keeping the design simple and sleek.

The Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 both feature an LCD, IPS display with the same resolution of 720 x 1600 px, ensuring similar sharpness in terms of pixel count. The Infinix Hot 60i 5G offers a slightly larger 6.75″ screen, while the Tecno Spark 40 has a 6.67″ display, making the former a bit more expansive.

In terms of pixel density, the Tecno Spark 40 edges ahead with 263 ppi, compared to the Infinix Hot 60i 5G’s 260 ppi. This difference is minimal, and both displays should offer clear visuals, though the Tecno Spark 40 may have a very slight advantage in sharpness.

Regarding touch performance, the Infinix Hot 60i 5G has a higher touch sampling rate of 240Hz, making it potentially more responsive for touch inputs compared to the Tecno Spark 40, which has a lower rate of 120Hz. Additionally, the Infinix model supports an Always-On Display, while the Tecno Spark 40 does not. Neither phone includes branded damage-resistant glass, supports HDR10 or HDR10+, or has Dolby Vision support.

Both the Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 offer identical internal storage of 256GB and RAM of 8GB. Both devices support 64-bit architecture and include integrated LTE, ensuring good connectivity options. They also both feature integrated graphics, with the Infinix using the Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU and the Tecno using the Mali G52 MP2 GPU.

The chipset in the Infinix Hot 60i 5G is the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, which is built on a 6 nm semiconductor, while the Tecno Spark 40 uses the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra with a larger 12 nm semiconductor. This difference in semiconductor size could imply better energy efficiency for the Infinix model. In terms of CPU performance, the Infinix has a faster CPU speed, featuring 2 cores at 2.5 GHz and 6 cores at 2 GHz, compared to the Tecno Spark 40’s 2 cores at 2 GHz and 6 cores at 1.8 GHz.

The Infinix Hot 60i 5G also has a higher RAM speed of 2133 MHz, compared to the Tecno Spark 40’s 1800 MHz, which could lead to faster memory performance on the Infinix. Additionally, the Infinix Hot 60i 5G offers a maximum memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s, while the Tecno Spark 40’s maximum memory bandwidth is lower at 13.41 GB/s. Both phones use big.LITTLE technology and support DirectX 12, with the same DDR memory version of 4.

Both the Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 feature a 50 MP main camera and an 8 MP front camera. Neither device offers a dual-lens or multi-lens camera setup, with both using a single lens for both the main and front cameras. Both phones also lack built-in optical image stabilization and have a CMOS sensor in their main camera.

Video recording on both devices is similar, supporting a resolution of 1440 x 30 fps, and both have continuous autofocus during video recording. However, the Infinix Hot 60i 5G has additional features such as slow-motion video recording, a built-in HDR mode, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. The Tecno Spark 40, on the other hand, does not support slow-motion video recording or a built-in HDR mode, and it lacks the timelapse function available on the Infinix.

Both phones feature manual exposure, manual ISO control, and touch autofocus. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both lack 3D photo/video recording capabilities. Both also have the ability to take panoramas, though the Infinix supports more advanced features like timelapse, which the Tecno does not.

Both the Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 run on Android 15, offering a similar software foundation. Both devices include features such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They also support blocking app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, and media pickers.

In terms of additional features, both phones allow playing games while they download, have dark mode, support Wi-Fi password sharing (though both lack this feature), and have battery health checks. They also share an extra dim mode and dynamic theming capabilities, with both supporting app offloading and customizable notifications. Both devices also feature Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen functionality, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), sharing intents, a child lock, and widgets.

While the two phones offer similar software capabilities, they both lack features such as Quick Start and do not provide direct OS updates. Both phones also track the current position of the mobile device, support offline voice recognition, voice commands, and function as multi-user systems. Both devices are free and open source.

The Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 both feature non-removable rechargeable batteries, with the Infinix having a larger 6000 mAh battery compared to the Tecno Spark 40’s 5200 mAh. Both phones support fast charging at a speed of 45W, ensuring quick battery top-ups, but neither device offers wireless charging capabilities.

Both devices include a battery level indicator to help users monitor remaining battery life, making it easier to manage power throughout the day. However, there is no mention of any other notable differences in battery-related features between the two models.

Both the Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 include a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing users to connect traditional wired headphones. Additionally, both devices are equipped with stereo speakers, providing a richer audio experience. However, neither phone supports advanced audio technologies like aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, meaning both phones have similar audio capabilities without high-definition Bluetooth audio support.

In summary, both phones offer standard audio features with a 3.5 mm jack and stereo speakers, but they do not support premium audio protocols for wireless audio streaming.

The Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 differ in 5G support, with the Infinix supporting 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 limited to 4G, which affects their maximum download speeds. The Infinix offers a faster download speed of 3300 MBits/s, while the Tecno Spark 40 has a slower 300 MBits/s. Both phones support dual SIM cards and have an external memory slot, providing flexibility for storage expansion.

In terms of connectivity, both devices feature USB Type-C and support Wi-Fi and GPS. The Infinix Hot 60i 5G also includes NFC and an infrared sensor, while the Tecno Spark 40 lacks NFC and infrared capabilities. Both devices have accelerometers and cellular modules, but the Infinix has a broader set of features like motion tracking and Galileo support, which the Tecno Spark 40 also supports, but lacks motion tracking.

Both phones include a fingerprint scanner, but neither has advanced features like an iris scanner, 3D facial recognition, or a built-in projector. Additionally, neither phone has features such as emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, or a barometer. Overall, the Infinix Hot 60i 5G offers more connectivity and sensor options than the Tecno Spark 40, including NFC and an infrared sensor, while the Tecno Spark 40 focuses on the core features.

Both the Infinix Hot 60i 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 come equipped with a video light, allowing for improved lighting during video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays, as both phones share the same lack of these specific display technologies.

In summary, the key similarity between the two devices in this category is their inclusion of a video light. Both devices have standard display features without the addition of more advanced display options like sapphire glass or curved screens.