Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB VS Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB and Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB show some notable differences in their performance specifications. The Inno3D model has a GPU clock speed of 2407 MHz and a turbo boost of 2572 MHz, while the Sapphire Radeon’s GPU clock speed is lower at 1700 MHz but features a significantly higher turbo clock of 3290 MHz. This could indicate a difference in how the two GPUs handle high-performance tasks at peak speeds.

In terms of pixel rate, the Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT leads with 210.6 GPixel/s compared to the Inno3D’s 123.5 GPixel/s, which points to the Radeon model's ability to process more pixels per second. The floating-point performance also shows the Radeon on top with 26.95 TFLOPS, slightly ahead of the Inno3D’s 23.7 TFLOPS. Meanwhile, the Inno3D model has a slightly lower texture rate of 370.4 GTexels/s, compared to the Sapphire’s higher texture rate of 421.1 GTexels/s, further showing a performance difference in texture-heavy tasks.

The Inno3D GPU uses a memory speed of 1750 MHz, while the Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT comes with a much faster 2518 MHz memory speed, which could affect bandwidth and overall memory access. The Inno3D model has 4608 shading units, while the Sapphire model has only 2048 shading units, which could imply a difference in how the GPUs handle complex shading tasks. The Inno3D has 144 texture mapping units (TMUs), slightly ahead of the Sapphire’s 128, but the Radeon makes up for it with 64 render output units (ROPs) compared to the Inno3D’s 48 ROPs. Finally, both products support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) operations, meaning both are capable of handling double-precision calculations, which can be critical for certain scientific or engineering applications.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB and Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB have some distinct differences in their memory specifications. The Inno3D model is equipped with an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, which is noticeably higher than the Sapphire Radeon’s 20000 MHz. This suggests that the Inno3D model might offer faster memory performance for tasks that rely heavily on memory speed.

Both products come with 16GB of VRAM, so they are equivalent in terms of available video memory. However, the GDDR version differs: the Inno3D uses GDDR7 memory, while the Sapphire model uses GDDR6 memory. This could affect the overall performance and efficiency of the memory, with GDDR7 generally offering better data transfer rates and power efficiency compared to GDDR6.

When it comes to memory bandwidth, the Inno3D’s maximum bandwidth of 448 GB/s surpasses the Sapphire’s 322.3 GB/s, indicating that the Inno3D model can handle more data per second. Both products feature a 128-bit memory bus width and support ECC memory, meaning both are capable of error-correcting memory, which can be important for stability in certain applications.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB and Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB share several features, but there are some differences worth noting. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and ray tracing, offering solid performance for modern gaming and graphical tasks. However, the Inno3D model supports OpenCL 3, while the Sapphire model only supports OpenCL 2.2, suggesting that the Inno3D may be better suited for applications that rely on the latest version of OpenCL.

Both products support multi-display technology and 3D, allowing for enhanced visual setups. The Inno3D model also supports DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), which can improve performance in compatible games by using AI to upscale lower-resolution images, while the Sapphire model does not support DLSS. Additionally, the Inno3D has Intel Resizable BAR support, while the Sapphire model supports AMD SAM, which are similar technologies for improving performance by enabling more efficient communication between the CPU and GPU.

When it comes to display support, the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti supports up to 4 displays, while the Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT supports up to 3 displays. Both products do not feature RGB lighting, and neither has XeSS (XMX) support, meaning both lack Intel's AI-based supersampling technology. Both products are also free from LHR (Lite Hash Rate), ensuring they are not restricted for cryptocurrency mining purposes.

Both the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB and the Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB feature HDMI outputs, with each offering 1 HDMI port. Both models support HDMI 2.1b, ensuring compatibility with modern displays and high refresh rates. In terms of DisplayPort outputs, the Inno3D card has 3 ports, while the Sapphire model provides 2, which could influence multi-monitor setups depending on the number of DisplayPort monitors required.

Neither of the cards includes USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs, so users will need to rely on the HDMI and DisplayPort connections for display connectivity.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB and the Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB differ in several key general specifications. The Inno3D model is based on the Blackwell GPU architecture, while the Sapphire model uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture. In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the Inno3D has a slightly higher TDP of 180W, compared to the Sapphire's 170W, suggesting that the Inno3D may require slightly more power under load.

Both products support PCI Express version 5, ensuring high-speed connectivity with modern motherboards. The Inno3D card uses a 5 nm semiconductor size, while the Sapphire card features a 4 nm semiconductor size, indicating that the Sapphire model uses a more advanced manufacturing process with potentially better energy efficiency or performance characteristics.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti has 21,900 million transistors, whereas the Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT has a higher count at 29,700 million transistors, which could suggest that the Sapphire card may be able to handle more complex computations. In terms of physical size, the Inno3D is 250 mm in width and 116 mm in height, while the Sapphire is slightly smaller at 240 mm in width and 124 mm in height. Both models lack air-water cooling solutions.