Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB VS MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Inspire 2X OC 16GB

When comparing the performance specifications of the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Inspire 2X OC 16GB, both products offer very similar capabilities. The GPU clock speed of the Inno3D model is 2235 MHz, while the MSI model has a slightly higher clock speed at 2407 MHz. Both cards have an impressive GPU turbo boost, with the Inno3D reaching 2602 MHz and the MSI topping out at 2617 MHz, showing a minimal difference between them.

In terms of pixel rate, the Inno3D card achieves 124.9 GPixel/s, while the MSI surpasses it with 125.6 GPixel/s. The texture rate of the Inno3D is 374.7 GTexels/s, and the MSI performs slightly better with 376.8 GTexels/s. For floating-point performance, the Inno3D offers 23.98 TFLOPS, while the MSI leads with 24.12 TFLOPS. Both products have the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, and both are equipped with the same number of shading units (4608), texture mapping units (144), and render output units (48).

Both the Inno3D and MSI models support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), ensuring advanced computational capabilities. Overall, the specifications are quite close, with the MSI card showing slight advantages in clock speed, pixel rate, and floating-point performance, but both cards deliver similar high-performance features.

In terms of memory specifications, the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Inspire 2X OC 16GB are identical. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, and a VRAM capacity of 16GB. Additionally, both models utilize the GDDR7 memory type and have a 128-bit memory bus width, providing similar data transfer capabilities.

Furthermore, both the Inno3D and MSI cards support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring greater reliability for tasks requiring high accuracy.

Given that all the memory specifications are exactly the same, users can expect the same memory performance from both products without any distinction in this area.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Inspire 2X OC 16GB share identical feature sets. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, offering compatibility with modern gaming and professional applications. They both also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, ensuring enhanced graphics capabilities for immersive experiences.

Additionally, both models support DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) for improved performance and visual quality. Neither card includes XeSS (XMX), and both support Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM is not supported). Neither card has LHR (Lite Hash Rate) limitations or RGB lighting, focusing purely on performance and functionality.

Both cards can support up to four displays, providing ample connectivity for users who require multiple monitor setups.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Inspire 2X OC 16GB are identical in terms of their port configuration. Both cards feature one HDMI output, with the HDMI version being HDMI 2.1b. They also have three DisplayPort outputs, and neither card includes USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

In summary, both products offer the same port setup, providing the same connectivity options for users looking to connect multiple displays or compatible devices.

Both the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Inspire 2X OC 16GB share identical specifications in several key areas. Both cards feature the Blackwell GPU architecture, a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 180W, and use the PCI Express (PCIe) 5.0 version. They also both have a semiconductor size of 5 nm and contain 21,900 million transistors. Neither model includes air-water cooling.

However, the two cards differ slightly in their physical dimensions. The Inno3D card has a width of 250 mm and a height of 116 mm, while the MSI model is slightly more compact with a width of 204 mm and a height of 117 mm.

Overall, the specifications for GPU architecture, power consumption, and connectivity are identical, with the primary difference being the physical size of the two cards.