Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 8GB VS Yeston Cute Pet GeForce RTX 5060

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 8GB and Yeston Cute Pet GeForce RTX 5060 differ in a few key performance metrics. Starting with GPU clock speeds, the Inno3D card has a base GPU clock speed of 2235 MHz, while the Yeston model runs slightly faster at 2280 MHz. However, the Inno3D card has a higher GPU turbo speed of 2602 MHz compared to the Yeston's 2497 MHz.

When it comes to pixel rate, the Inno3D card leads with 124.9 GPixel/s, outpacing the Yeston's 119.9 GPixel/s. The Inno3D card also has a higher texture rate of 374.7 GTexels/s, whereas the Yeston card has a lower texture rate of 299.6 GTexels/s.

Regarding floating-point performance, the Inno3D card performs significantly better with 23.98 TFLOPS, while the Yeston card is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS. Both products have identical GPU memory speeds of 1750 MHz, as well as 48 render output units (ROPs). The Inno3D card has 4608 shading units and 144 texture mapping units (TMUs), while the Yeston card has 3840 shading units and 120 TMUs. Both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), though the Yeston card lacks specific values for some of the other specs.

The memory specifications of the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 8GB and Yeston Cute Pet GeForce RTX 5060 are identical. Both products feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. They also share the same VRAM capacity of 8GB, GDDR7 memory type, and a 128-bit memory bus width.

Additionally, both cards support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring data integrity during processing. Since the specifications match across all categories, there are no differences between these two models in terms of memory performance.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 8GB and Yeston Cute Pet GeForce RTX 5060 are very similar in terms of features, with both cards supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3. They both also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, as well as DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling). Additionally, both cards feature Intel Resizable BAR support and lack LHR (Lite Hash Rate) functionality.

The main difference between these two models is in the RGB lighting. The Inno3D card does not include RGB lighting, while the Yeston card does feature RGB lighting. Another aspect where the two differ is in the supported displays; both cards support up to four displays, so there is no distinction in this regard.

In summary, the Inno3D and Yeston cards share a lot of common features, with the Yeston card standing out due to its inclusion of RGB lighting, which is absent in the Inno3D model.

The port configurations of the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 8GB and Yeston Cute Pet GeForce RTX 5060 are identical. Both cards feature one HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b support and three DisplayPort outputs. Neither card includes USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs, so their port options are the same in all categories.

In summary, there are no differences between the two models in terms of available ports, as both offer the same HDMI, DisplayPort, and lack of additional outputs.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 8GB and Yeston Cute Pet GeForce RTX 5060 share the same GPU architecture, which is Blackwell, and both use a 5 nm semiconductor size. They also have the same number of transistors, with 21,900 million in each card. The PCI Express (PCIe) version is 5 for both products, and neither model includes air-water cooling.

There are notable differences in thermal design power (TDP). The Inno3D card has a higher TDP of 180W, compared to the Yeston card's 145W. In terms of physical size, the Inno3D model is slightly longer, with a width of 250 mm and height of 116 mm, while the Yeston card is smaller at 185 mm wide and 129 mm tall.

Overall, while both cards have identical internal architecture and transistor count, the Inno3D card is larger and consumes more power than the Yeston card.