Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti X3 OC 16GB VS XFX Swift Radeon RX 9060 XT OC Triple Fan Gaming Edition 16GB

The GPU clock speed for the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti X3 OC 16GB is 2407 MHz, while the XFX Swift Radeon RX 9060 XT OC Triple Fan Gaming Edition 16GB has a slightly lower clock speed of 1900 MHz. However, the XFX GPU boosts to a much higher turbo speed of 3320 MHz compared to the Inno3D's 2602 MHz.

In terms of pixel rate, the XFX card outperforms the Inno3D, delivering 212.5 GPixel/s versus 124.9 GPixel/s for the Inno3D. The XFX also has a higher texture rate, reaching 425 GTexels/s, while the Inno3D offers 374.7 GTexels/s.

For floating-point performance, the XFX card again leads with 27.2 TFLOPS, compared to 23.98 TFLOPS for the Inno3D. The GPU memory speed is significantly faster on the XFX, clocking in at 2518 MHz, while the Inno3D runs at 1750 MHz. The Inno3D features 4608 shading units, while the XFX card has 2048, which could be a consideration for some applications. The XFX also has more render output units (ROPs) at 64 compared to the Inno3D's 48, while both products offer Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) support.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti X3 OC 16GB has an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, which is higher than the XFX Swift Radeon RX 9060 XT OC Triple Fan Gaming Edition 16GB's effective memory speed of 20000 MHz. Despite this difference, both cards feature 16GB of VRAM, so the total memory capacity is the same for both products.

When it comes to maximum memory bandwidth, the Inno3D card offers a higher bandwidth of 448 GB/s compared to the XFX's 322.3 GB/s, indicating that the Inno3D could provide faster memory throughput under certain workloads.

Both cards use a 128-bit memory bus width, and both support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring data integrity in both cases. The Inno3D uses GDDR7 memory, while the XFX card uses GDDR6, which may affect the overall performance potential, with GDDR7 typically offering higher speeds and efficiency compared to GDDR6.

Both the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti X3 OC 16GB and the XFX Swift Radeon RX 9060 XT OC Triple Fan Gaming Edition 16GB support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL version 4.6, so there’s no difference in terms of those key graphics APIs. The Inno3D supports OpenCL 3, while the XFX card supports OpenCL 2.2, which could impact certain compute-heavy tasks that rely on OpenCL.

Both products support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, but the Inno3D supports DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), while the XFX does not. Neither product supports XeSS (XMX), so that feature is absent in both cases.

The Inno3D supports Intel Resizable BAR, whereas the XFX card supports AMD SAM (Smart Access Memory). Both products lack LHR (Lite Hash Rate) features. As for RGB lighting, the Inno3D does not include RGB lighting, while the XFX card does. Finally, the Inno3D supports up to 4 displays, while the XFX supports 3 displays.

Both the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti X3 OC 16GB and the XFX Swift Radeon RX 9060 XT OC Triple Fan Gaming Edition 16GB feature one HDMI output, with both cards supporting HDMI 2.1b. The number of DisplayPort outputs differs slightly, with the Inno3D offering 3 DisplayPort outputs, while the XFX has 2.

Neither card provides USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs, so there are no differences in those areas between the two products.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti X3 OC 16GB uses the Blackwell GPU architecture, while the XFX Swift Radeon RX 9060 XT OC Triple Fan Gaming Edition 16GB is based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture. In terms of Thermal Design Power (TDP), the Inno3D card has a slightly higher TDP of 180W, compared to the 160W of the XFX card.

Both cards support PCI Express (PCIe) version 5, indicating high-speed data transfer capabilities. The Inno3D card uses a 5 nm semiconductor size, while the XFX card features a slightly smaller 4 nm semiconductor size, which could potentially offer better performance and efficiency.

The number of transistors is also different: the Inno3D card has 21,900 million transistors, whereas the XFX card has 29,700 million transistors, which could be relevant for processing power. Both cards lack air-water cooling and have similar physical dimensions, with the Inno3D being 300 mm wide and 116 mm high, while the XFX card is 290 mm wide and 124 mm high.