Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 OC VS Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Infinity 3 OC

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 OC and the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Infinity 3 OC share several key performance features, but there are also some noticeable differences. Both products have a GPU clock speed of 2280 MHz, with the Palit model offering a slightly higher GPU turbo speed of 2580 MHz compared to the Inno3D's 2527 MHz. In terms of pixel rate, the Palit model leads with 123.8 GPixel/s, while the Inno3D model has a pixel rate of 121.3 GPixel/s. The floating-point performance is also slightly higher in the Palit version at 19.81 TFLOPS, compared to 19.41 TFLOPS on the Inno3D model.

Texture rate is another area where the Palit product shows an edge, offering 309.6 GTexels/s compared to the Inno3D's 303.2 GTexels/s. Both products share the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, as well as identical specifications for shading units (3840), texture mapping units (120), and render output units (48). Additionally, both models support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP).

Overall, the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Infinity 3 OC has a slight advantage in several areas such as GPU turbo, pixel rate, and floating-point performance, but both products offer very similar core features.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 OC and the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Infinity 3 OC share identical memory specifications. Both products feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, and 8GB of VRAM. Additionally, both models use GDDR7 memory and have a 128-bit memory bus width. They also both support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring more reliable performance in critical workloads.

Since the memory specs are the same across both products, users can expect equivalent performance in terms of memory speed, bandwidth, and capacity. There are no differences in this category.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 OC and the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Infinity 3 OC offer virtually identical feature sets. Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of modern applications. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, along with DLSS for enhanced performance in supported games.

Neither product includes XeSS (XMX) support, and both have Intel Resizable BAR (also known as AMD SAM) compatibility. Both models lack LHR (Lite Hash Rate) support, which can be a consideration for cryptocurrency miners. Additionally, neither product features RGB lighting, a common feature in some graphics cards aimed at enthusiasts.

Both the Inno3D and Palit models can support up to four displays, meaning they’re equally suited for multi-monitor setups. Overall, the feature sets of these two models are identical, offering the same capabilities and technologies.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 OC and the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Infinity 3 OC offer identical port configurations. Both products feature one HDMI output, with an HDMI version of 2.1b. They also each include three DisplayPort outputs, and neither product offers USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

With the port configurations matching exactly, users can expect the same connectivity options across both models, whether for single or multi-display setups.

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 OC and the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Infinity 3 OC share the same GPU architecture, using the Blackwell architecture and a 5 nm semiconductor size. Both models also feature the same number of transistors, at 21900 million, and support PCIe version 5.0. Neither product includes air-water cooling.

However, the two products differ in terms of their thermal design power (TDP). The Inno3D model has a TDP of 145W, while the Palit model is rated at 155W. The physical dimensions also vary slightly, with the Inno3D measuring 250 mm in width and 116 mm in height, compared to the Palit’s 291.9 mm width and 116.6 mm height.

Overall, the differences between these two products in this category are relatively small, with the Palit model having a slightly higher TDP and being slightly larger in size.