iQOO TWS Air 3 VS Vivo TWS Air 3

Both the iQOO TWS Air 3 and the Vivo TWS Air 3 share identical specifications in the design category. Both are earbud-style wireless earphones with a sweat-resistant water resistance rating and an IP54 ingress protection rating, making them suitable for workouts and light exposure to water.

In terms of weight, both models weigh 7.2 grams, making them lightweight and comfortable for extended use. Neither product has any wires or cables, and neither uses a neckband design. Both are equipped with stereo speakers for sound output and do not include wingtips for additional fit options.

Additionally, neither model has RGB lighting, UV light, or a display, keeping their designs sleek and minimalistic without additional visual features.

The iQOO TWS Air 3 and Vivo TWS Air 3 have largely similar sound quality specifications. Both models lack active noise cancellation (ANC) and passive noise reduction features, meaning they do not actively block outside noise during use. Both also have identical driver unit sizes at 12 mm, which should provide a similar audio performance in terms of driver capability.

For frequency range, both earbuds support the same lowest frequency of 20 Hz and the highest frequency of 20,000 Hz, ensuring they cover the full spectrum of human hearing. However, the Vivo TWS Air 3 stands out with support for spatial audio, which the iQOO TWS Air 3 does not offer.

Neither product includes Dolby Atmos, Dirac Virtuo, or a neodymium magnet, meaning both models are fairly standard in terms of additional sound-enhancing technologies.

The iQOO TWS Air 3 and Vivo TWS Air 3 have several similar features when it comes to power and battery life, but there are some differences to note. The iQOO TWS Air 3 offers a battery life of 7 hours on a single charge, while the Vivo TWS Air 3 lasts slightly longer at 10 hours. For the charging case, the iQOO TWS Air 3 provides a total of 38 hours of additional playtime, while the Vivo TWS Air 3 offers 35 hours.

In terms of charging time, the iQOO TWS Air 3 takes 1.5 hours to charge fully, while the Vivo TWS Air 3 takes 2 hours, which is slightly longer. Both models lack wireless charging capabilities and have rechargeable batteries. Additionally, both earbuds have a battery level indicator, making it easy to monitor remaining power.

Neither product features a solar power battery, so users will rely on standard charging methods.

The iQOO TWS Air 3 and Vivo TWS Air 3 have nearly identical connectivity features, with only a few differences. Both models support USB Type-C charging and Bluetooth 6. Neither has fast pairing, NFC Bluetooth pairing, or support for AAC, LDAC, LDHC, Bluetooth LE Audio, aptX (including Adaptive, Low Latency, HD, or Lossless), aptX Voice, or Auracast.

One key difference is the audio latency: the iQOO TWS Air 3 has an audio latency of 44 ms, while the Vivo TWS Air 3 has a slightly lower latency of 33 ms. This difference may result in a small improvement in syncing audio with video on the Vivo model.

Both earbuds have a maximum Bluetooth range of 10 meters and can be used wirelessly, offering similar connectivity performance overall.

The iQOO TWS Air 3 and Vivo TWS Air 3 share a lot of the same features, with both supporting fast charging and multipoint connectivity, allowing users to connect to two devices simultaneously. Both models also include a mute function, can be used as a headset, have a control panel placed on the device, offer voice prompts, and come with a travel bag.

Neither product has the ability to read notifications, an in-line control panel, or a temperature sensor. One difference is that the iQOO TWS Air 3 includes a built-in camera remote control function, while the Vivo TWS Air 3 does not.

Overall, both earbuds offer a similar set of features, with the only distinction being the camera remote control function exclusive to the iQOO TWS Air 3.

Both the iQOO TWS Air 3 and Vivo TWS Air 3 are equipped with a noise-canceling microphone. This feature ensures that both models are capable of reducing background noise during calls or voice recordings, enhancing clarity in communications.

There is no difference between the two products in terms of microphone capabilities; both include the same noise-canceling microphone functionality.