Itel A90 VS Xiaomi Poco C71

Both the Itel A90 and Xiaomi Poco C71 offer water resistance, but their IP ratings differ. The Itel A90 has an IP54 rating, while the Xiaomi Poco C71 is rated IP52. This means the Itel A90 is slightly more resistant to dust and water ingress than the Poco C71.

In terms of weight, the Xiaomi Poco C71 is lighter at 193 g compared to the Itel A90, which weighs 213 g. The thickness of the devices is also similar, with the Itel A90 being 8.55 mm thick and the Poco C71 being slightly thinner at 8.3 mm.

When it comes to dimensions, the Itel A90 has a height of 168.4 mm and a width of 76.2 mm, while the Poco C71 measures 171.8 mm in height and 77.8 mm in width. These differences suggest that the Poco C71 is slightly larger overall. Neither device has a rugged build or can be folded, indicating that they are both traditional, non-flexible designs.

Both the Itel A90 and Xiaomi Poco C71 feature LCD, IPS displays, offering similar display technologies. However, their screen sizes differ, with the Poco C71 having a larger 6.88″ screen compared to the 6.6″ display on the Itel A90.

In terms of pixel density, the Itel A90 has a slightly higher value at 267 ppi, while the Poco C71 is at 260 ppi. The resolution is also very similar, with the Itel A90 having 720 x 1612 px and the Poco C71 having 720 x 1640 px, suggesting a marginal difference in the vertical resolution.

For refresh rates, the Poco C71 offers a smoother 120Hz refresh rate, whereas the Itel A90 is limited to 90Hz. Both devices lack branded damage-resistant glass and do not support HDR10, HDR10+, Always-On Display, Dolby Vision, or have a secondary screen. Both devices feature a touch screen as well.

The Itel A90 and Xiaomi Poco C71 differ in storage and RAM configurations. The Itel A90 comes with 256GB of internal storage and 4GB of RAM, while the Poco C71 has 128GB of internal storage but offers 6GB of RAM. This gives the Poco C71 an advantage in multitasking performance due to its higher RAM, but the Itel A90 has more storage for apps, media, and files.

Both devices use a similar GPU, the Mali-G57, and are powered by different versions of the Unisoc chipset. The Itel A90 features the Unisoc T700 chipset, while the Poco C71 uses the Unisoc T7250. Both chipsets have the same 12nm semiconductor size and support 64-bit processing. The CPU configuration in both devices consists of 8 threads, with a big.LITTLE architecture. However, the Itel A90 has a slightly faster CPU with 2 x 1.8 GHz and 6 x 1.8 GHz cores, whereas the Poco C71 has 2 x 1.8 GHz and 6 x 1.6 GHz cores.

Both devices support integrated LTE, have integrated graphics, and feature eMMC 5.1 storage. Additionally, both support TrustZone security technology.

The Itel A90 and Xiaomi Poco C71 differ significantly in their main camera resolutions. The Itel A90 features a 13 MP main camera, while the Poco C71 has a higher 32 MP main camera. Both devices have a 5 MP front camera on the Itel A90 and an 8 MP front camera on the Poco C71.

Both phones offer similar camera features, including phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus for video, manual exposure, manual ISO, and support for slow-motion video recording. Neither device supports optical image stabilization, HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, or has a dual-lens front or rear camera setup. Both cameras also lack 360° panorama shooting and laser autofocus.

Other common features include a flash (one LED each), CMOS sensors, and the ability to create in-camera panoramas. Both phones lack a front-facing LED flash and 3D photo/video recording capabilities, and neither supports raw image capture. Additionally, both devices offer touch autofocus and manual white balance adjustments, but neither has a front-facing camera under the display.

The Itel A90 runs on Android 14, while the Xiaomi Poco C71 uses Android 15. Both operating systems provide a wide range of privacy and customization features, such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy controls, and theme customization. Both devices also allow users to block app tracking, support on-device machine learning, and provide notification permissions and media picker options.

Neither device supports Wi-Fi password sharing, and neither offers focus modes or Quick Start. Both phones allow app offloading, support dynamic theming, and have dark mode, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split-screen functionality. Additionally, both devices provide Picture-in-Picture (PiP) support, voice commands, offline voice recognition, and multi-user system capabilities.

Other shared features include the ability to track the device's current position, the inclusion of a child lock, support for widgets, and the ability to create sharing intents. However, the Itel A90 lacks direct OS updates, which is also the case for the Poco C71. Both phones also do not support using the device as a PC, nor do they have Mail Privacy Protection or the ability to block cross-site tracking.

The Itel A90 and Xiaomi Poco C71 have very similar battery specifications. The Itel A90 comes with a 5000 mAh battery, while the Poco C71 has a slightly larger 5200 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging at a speed of 15W and come with a charger in the box. Neither device supports wireless charging, and both have a rechargeable, non-removable battery.

Both phones also include a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily check the remaining charge. There is no significant difference in battery-related features between the two devices beyond the slight difference in battery capacity, with both offering the same fast charging and overall power management capabilities.

Both the Itel A90 and Xiaomi Poco C71 are equipped with a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing users to connect wired headphones or other audio devices. However, neither device has stereo speakers, limiting the audio experience to mono sound through the built-in speakers.

Neither phone supports high-quality Bluetooth audio codecs such as aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, meaning their Bluetooth audio performance is standard. The Itel A90 lacks a radio, while the Xiaomi Poco C71 includes a radio, providing an additional audio feature for users who enjoy FM radio.

Both the Itel A90 and Xiaomi Poco C71 lack 5G support, but they offer robust connectivity features. The Itel A90 supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), while the Poco C71 supports both Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), offering more flexibility in wireless networking. Both phones use USB Type-C (version 2) for charging and data transfer and feature Bluetooth, with the Poco C71 having the more advanced Bluetooth version 5.2, compared to the Itel A90's Bluetooth 4.2.

When it comes to SIM capabilities, both phones support dual SIM cards. The Itel A90 does not have an external memory slot, while the Poco C71 does, allowing for expandable storage. Both phones feature a fingerprint scanner, GPS, and an accelerometer. The Poco C71 also includes a compass, which the Itel A90 does not have.

Neither device supports NFC, emergency SOS via satellite, or crash detection. Both lack infrared sensors and barometers, and neither supports motion or optical tracking. Both phones also lack HDMI output and have no stylus included. Both phones support Galileo satellite navigation, but neither includes a 3D facial recognition system, iris scanner, or a built-in projector.

Both the Itel A90 and Xiaomi Poco C71 are equipped with a video light, allowing for improved lighting in videos. Neither device features sapphire glass for added display durability, has a curved display, or comes with an e-paper display.

These specifications are identical for both phones, with no differences in terms of additional display or video-related features in this group.