KFA2 GeForce RTX 5060 1-Click OC VS KFA2 GeForce RTX 5060 EX

Both the KFA2 GeForce RTX 5060 1-Click OC and the EX share an identical foundation: the same 2280 MHz base clock, 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 1750 MHz memory speed. This means the underlying GPU silicon and memory subsystem are configured identically, and neither card holds an architectural advantage over the other.

The only differentiator within this group comes down to the GPU boost clock. The EX reaches a turbo of 2535 MHz versus 2512 MHz on the 1-Click OC — a gap of just 23 MHz, or roughly 0.9%. This marginal difference cascades into similarly slim leads across every derived metric: the EX edges ahead with 19.47 TFLOPS of floating-point performance versus 19.29 TFLOPS, and a texture rate of 304.2 GTexels/s compared to 301.4 GTexels/s. In real-world gaming or compute workloads, a sub-1% throughput difference of this kind is effectively imperceptible — it falls well within frame-to-frame variance and would not produce a measurable FPS difference in practice.

On paper, the EX holds a technical edge in performance purely by virtue of its higher boost clock, but the margin is so negligible that it should carry little weight in a purchase decision. Both cards are, for all practical purposes, performance-equivalent in this group.

When it comes to memory, the KFA2 RTX 5060 1-Click OC and EX are completely identical — there is not a single differentiating figure between them. Both carry 8GB of GDDR7 running at an effective 28000 MHz across a 128-bit bus, delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. That bandwidth figure is the headline: GDDR7 extracts substantially more throughput from a 128-bit interface than prior generations could, partially compensating for the relatively narrow bus width in a modern GPU context.

The practical implication is that neither card will have a memory-related advantage over the other in any workload. At 1080p and 1440p, 8GB remains viable for the majority of current titles, though highly texture-rich games at maximum settings are beginning to push against that ceiling. The ECC memory support shared by both cards is a minor but noteworthy inclusion, adding a layer of data integrity useful in compute or professional workloads — though it has no bearing on gaming performance.

This group is a complete tie. Every memory specification is shared verbatim between the two cards, so memory should play no role whatsoever in choosing between them.

Feature parity is absolute here. The KFA2 RTX 5060 1-Click OC and EX share an identical feature set across every listed specification. Most notably, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and ray tracing, meaning neither card is limited in its ability to run modern rendering pipelines — DX12 Ultimate is the current ceiling for API compatibility, covering hardware-accelerated ray tracing, mesh shaders, and variable-rate shading.

Both cards also support DLSS, which is arguably the most impactful software feature on this list. DLSS allows the GPU to render at a lower internal resolution and upscale intelligently, delivering a significant framerate boost with minimal visual quality loss — particularly valuable given the 8GB VRAM ceiling identified in the memory group. Support for up to 4 simultaneous displays and multi-display technology rounds out a capable feature set for productivity-oriented multi-monitor setups as well. The inclusion of Intel Resizable BAR on both cards enables the CPU to access the full GPU frame buffer at once, which can yield modest performance gains in supported titles.

With no feature exclusive to either card, this group is a complete tie by every available data point. The feature set itself is strong and modern, but it offers no basis for differentiation between the two SKUs.

Connectivity is another area where the two cards are indistinguishable. Both the 1-Click OC and the EX offer an identical port layout: one HDMI 2.1b output and three DisplayPort outputs, totaling four physical display connections — consistent with the four-display limit noted in the Features group. The absence of USB-C, DVI, and mini DisplayPort outputs is the same across both cards.

The quality of these ports matters as much as the count. HDMI 2.1b is the latest HDMI revision, supporting up to 10K resolution and high refresh rates at 4K — relevant for users connecting to high-end televisions or monitors via HDMI. The three DisplayPort outputs comfortably accommodate multi-monitor productivity setups or high-refresh-rate gaming displays, which typically favor DisplayPort for bandwidth headroom.

There is no differentiator to speak of in this group — both cards are a complete tie with identical port types, counts, and versions. Connectivity should have no influence on choosing between these two SKUs.

At the silicon level, these two cards are identical siblings. Both are built on the Blackwell architecture using a 5nm process node with 21,900 million transistors, and both carry a 145W TDP — meaning power delivery requirements and expected thermals are the same. PCIe 5.0 support is shared as well, though this has no practical impact on GPU performance in current systems.

The one concrete difference in this group is physical size. The 1-Click OC measures 237 × 131 mm, while the EX is noticeably larger at 267 × 142.5 mm — about 30mm longer and 11.5mm taller. That difference is meaningful for builders working with compact mid-tower or mini-ITX cases, where clearance is tight. The larger EX cooler shroud may also suggest a more substantial cooling solution, though the shared 145W TDP means both cards are dissipating the same amount of heat regardless of cooler size.

For case compatibility, the 1-Click OC holds a practical edge — its smaller footprint makes it the more flexible option for space-constrained builds. In a standard full or mid-tower with ample clearance, the size difference is irrelevant, and both cards are otherwise general-info equals.