Lava Storm Lite 5G VS Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM)

The Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) both feature water resistance with an IP64 Ingress Protection rating, ensuring protection against dust and water splashes. However, in terms of physical dimensions, the two phones differ slightly. The Lava Storm Lite 5G has a weight of 196 g, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G weighs slightly more at 202 g. When it comes to thickness, the Vivo T4 Lite is marginally slimmer at 8.2 mm compared to the Lava Storm Lite’s 8.3 mm.

In terms of width and height, the Lava Storm Lite 5G measures 78.1 mm in width and 168.8 mm in height, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G is a little narrower at 77 mm in width and slightly shorter at 167.3 mm in height. These differences in size contribute to a slightly smaller volume for the Vivo T4 Lite 5G at 105.6 cm³, compared to the Lava Storm Lite’s 109.4 cm³.

Neither of the devices has a rugged build or the ability to fold, so their designs are fairly standard for smartphones in this category.

Both the Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) feature LCD, IPS displays with a resolution of 720 x 1600 px, resulting in a similar visual experience for both. The pixel density is identical at 260 ppi for both devices, so the sharpness of text and images should be comparable.

The Lava Storm Lite 5G has a slightly larger 6.75″ screen, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G has a marginally smaller 6.74″ display. In terms of refresh rate, the Lava Storm Lite 5G offers a smoother 120Hz refresh rate, whereas the Vivo T4 Lite 5G supports a lower 90Hz refresh rate.

Neither device has branded damage-resistant glass, supports HDR10 or HDR10+, features Always-On Display, supports Dolby Vision, or includes a secondary screen. Both phones also come with a touch screen.

Both the Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) feature 128GB of internal storage and 4GB of RAM, ensuring similar storage and multitasking capabilities. The Lava Storm Lite 5G is equipped with the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 chipset, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G uses the slightly less powerful MediaTek Dimensity 6300. The Lava Storm Lite’s CPU consists of 2 cores running at 2.5 GHz and 6 cores running at 2 GHz, while the Vivo T4 Lite has 2 cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 cores at 2 GHz.

Both devices share the same GPU, the Arm Mali-G57 MC2, and have identical GPU clock speeds of 950 MHz. They also both support integrated LTE, 64-bit architecture, DirectX 12, integrated graphics, and big.LITTLE technology. RAM speed is the same at 2133 MHz, and both phones use DDR4 memory.

The maximum memory bandwidth is very close, with the Lava Storm Lite 5G offering 17.1 GB/s, slightly higher than the Vivo T4 Lite 5G's 17.07 GB/s. Both devices also support multithreading, ensuring efficient processing of multiple tasks simultaneously.

The Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) both have 5MP front cameras, though the main cameras differ slightly in configuration. The Lava Storm Lite 5G features a single 50 MP main camera, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G has a dual-lens system with a 50 MP main sensor paired with a 2 MP secondary sensor.

Both devices offer similar features such as phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus for video, support for slow-motion video recording, and the ability to capture panoramas in-camera. Both phones also include a flash with 1 LED and have manual exposure, manual ISO, and manual focus for more control over shots. Neither device supports optical zoom, shoots raw images, or has built-in optical image stabilization.

The Vivo T4 Lite 5G records video at a lower resolution of 1080 x 30 fps, while the Lava Storm Lite 5G records at a higher resolution of 1440 x 30 fps. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Both phones offer a similar set of other features, such as manual white balance, touch autofocus, and a timelapse function. Additionally, neither has a front-facing LED flash or supports 3D photo/video recording.

Both the Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) run on Android 15 and offer very similar operating system features. They both have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. Additionally, both phones support dark mode, battery health checks, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, and the ability to offload apps.

Key features like notification permissions, media picker, customizable notifications, and Live Text are also available on both devices. Both phones support split screen, Picture-in-Picture (PiP), widgets, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and tracking the current position of the device. They also both have sharing intents and a child lock.

Neither device supports Wi-Fi password sharing, has a focus mode, or offers Quick Start. Both phones are free and open source, and they support a multi-user system. Both devices also lack direct OS updates but include on-device machine learning and have full-page screenshot capabilities. The Vivo T4 Lite 5G and Lava Storm Lite 5G are quite similar in terms of their operating system features, with no significant differences between them in this category.

The Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) both feature rechargeable, non-removable batteries. The Lava Storm Lite 5G has a 5000 mAh battery, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G has a slightly larger 6000 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging at 15W, but neither has wireless charging capability.

Both phones are equipped with a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily monitor battery status. The battery power is the only area where the devices differ, with the Vivo T4 Lite offering more capacity with its 6000 mAh battery compared to the 5000 mAh on the Lava Storm Lite.

Overall, the battery-related features are very similar across both devices, with the main distinction being the battery capacity.

Both the Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) come with a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing users to connect wired headphones or other audio devices. The Lava Storm Lite 5G does not have stereo speakers, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G is equipped with stereo speakers for a more immersive audio experience.

Neither device supports advanced Bluetooth audio codecs such as aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. Additionally, neither phone offers a radio function, although the Vivo T4 Lite 5G does have a radio feature, which is not available on the Lava Storm Lite 5G.

In summary, the main audio differences between the two devices are the presence of stereo speakers and a radio on the Vivo T4 Lite 5G, whereas the Lava Storm Lite 5G lacks these features.

Both the Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) support 5G connectivity and come with dual SIM card slots, enabling users to manage multiple networks. They also share similar Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and both feature Bluetooth with slightly different versions: the Lava Storm Lite has Bluetooth 5.2, while the Vivo T4 Lite uses Bluetooth 5.4.

Both devices are equipped with USB Type-C ports, but they support the USB 2.0 version. Neither device includes NFC, an infrared sensor, or a built-in projector. Both phones offer a fingerprint scanner for security and include GPS and a compass for navigation. The Lava Storm Lite 5G also supports Galileo, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G provides the same support, but neither device has a barometer or HDMI output.

In terms of sensors, the Lava Storm Lite 5G includes a gyroscope and an accelerometer, while the Vivo T4 Lite 5G lacks a gyroscope but also has an accelerometer. Both phones support cellular modules and lack features like motion tracking, optical tracking, 3D facial recognition, and iris scanning.

Both the Lava Storm Lite 5G and Vivo T4 Lite 5G (128GB / 4GB RAM) include a video light feature, making them capable of improving video quality in low-light environments. Neither phone has sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, which are often found in higher-end or specialized devices.

The features related to display glass and display technology are identical across both devices, with both phones offering standard display materials without the added durability or flexibility of sapphire or curved glass displays.

In conclusion, both devices share the same specifications in this group, offering a video light feature but lacking sapphire glass, curved displays, and e-paper displays.