Lenovo Idea Tab Pro VS Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro

In terms of physical form, the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro and the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro are remarkably close siblings. Both weigh exactly 620 g, share the same 6.9 mm thickness and 189.1 mm height, and differ in width by less than a millimeter (291.18 mm vs. 291.8 mm). Their calculated volumes are virtually identical as well. In practice, a user picking up either device would find it impossible to distinguish them by feel alone — both occupy the same slim, mid-weight bracket that is portable enough for extended handheld use without feeling too light to feel substantial.

Both tablets ship with a stylus included, which is a meaningful value-add at the point of purchase — no extra accessory cost for note-taking or sketching. Neither offers a detachable or backlit keyboard, so productivity-focused buyers will need to source a keyboard accessory separately regardless of which model they choose.

The single meaningful differentiator in this group is water resistance: the Moto Pad 60 Pro carries a rated level of protection, while the Idea Tab Pro has none. For users who plan to use their tablet in kitchens, outdoors, or simply want peace of mind against accidental spills, this gives the Motorola a clear and practical edge. On every other design dimension the two devices are effectively tied, making water resistance the deciding factor for design-conscious buyers.

Across every display specification provided, the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro and the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro are a perfect match. Both feature a 12.7″ IPS LCD panel running at a 2944 x 1840 resolution, yielding 273 ppi — a pixel density that delivers sharp, detailed visuals well-suited to reading, media consumption, and creative work on a large-format tablet.

The shared 144Hz refresh rate is a standout trait at this screen size, translating to noticeably fluid scrolling, smoother stylus input, and more responsive UI interactions compared to the more common 60Hz or 90Hz panels found on competing tablets. Both devices also support HDR10, meaning compatible streaming content will render with a wider dynamic range and richer contrast. Neither tablet goes further with HDR10+ or Dolby Vision, so the HDR ceiling is the same for both.

With no differentiating data points anywhere in this group, the display category is a complete tie. A buyer prioritizing screen quality will find no reason to favor one over the other — they are, by every measurable display metric provided here, identical.

Both tablets are built around the same MediaTek Dimensity 8300 chipset, fabbed on a 4 nm process, and the benchmark data confirms they perform identically — matching Geekbench 6 scores of 4610 multi-core and 1485 single-core. Raw CPU and GPU throughput are, for all practical purposes, interchangeable between the two devices.

The sole differentiator in this group is RAM: 8GB on the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro versus 12GB on the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro. On a large-format tablet used for multitasking, split-screen workflows, or keeping many browser tabs and apps alive simultaneously, that extra 4GB is genuinely useful — it allows the system to retain more apps in the background without forcing reloads, and gives more headroom for memory-intensive tasks like video editing or running productivity suites alongside other apps. Both devices top out at the same 24GB maximum supported memory, so there is upgrade parity at the ceiling, but out of the box the Moto Pad 60 Pro starts with a more comfortable cushion.

Given that every other performance variable — chipset, GPU, storage, Android version — is identical, the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro holds a clear edge in this category purely on the strength of its higher base RAM, which translates directly to smoother sustained multitasking in real-world use.

Camera hardware is essentially a wash between these two tablets. Both carry a 13 MP rear camera and an 8 MP front camera, with a shared feature set that includes HDR mode, touch autofocus, continuous autofocus during video, manual ISO, white balance, focus, and exposure controls. For a tablet in this class, that is a respectable toolkit — the manual controls in particular give users meaningful flexibility for document scanning, video calls, and casual photography.

The one place they diverge is slow-motion video recording: the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro supports it, the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro does not. Slow-motion capture is a niche but occasionally handy feature — useful for analyzing motion, creating stylized clips, or educational demonstrations. Its absence on the Moto Pad 60 Pro is a minor but concrete omission.

Neither tablet offers optical zoom, optical image stabilization, or any advanced sensor technology like BSI, so neither is positioned as a serious imaging device. Still, based strictly on the data provided, the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro holds a narrow edge in this category, with slow-motion video being the sole functional differentiator.

Audio is another category where the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro and the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro are mirror images of each other. Both feature stereo speakers — a meaningful baseline for a large-format tablet used for media consumption — and both drop the 3.5 mm headphone jack, pushing wired audio users toward an adapter or a USB-C solution.

On the wireless audio side, neither device supports any high-quality Bluetooth codec: aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, and their variants are all absent on both tablets. This means Bluetooth headphone users are limited to standard SBC or AAC transmission, which is adequate for casual listening but falls short for audiophiles or anyone seeking lossless wireless audio quality.

With every data point in this group identical, the audio category is a complete tie. Neither tablet offers an advantage here, and buyers with strong audio priorities — particularly those who rely on high-resolution wireless codecs or wired headphones — will face the same limitations regardless of which device they choose.

A 10200 mAh battery is a substantial cell for a tablet, and both the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro and the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro are equipped with exactly that. For a large-screen device running a 144Hz display, this capacity is well-matched — it provides meaningful endurance through long work sessions, travel, or extended media consumption without requiring a mid-day charge.

Fast charging is supported on both, which matters when you do need to top up quickly. Neither device offers wireless charging, so users who have come to rely on Qi pads in their workflow will need to stick to wired connections on either tablet. The battery is also non-removable on both, which is standard practice for this device category.

Every battery specification is identical across these two tablets, making this category a complete tie. Endurance expectations and charging behavior will be indistinguishable in everyday use, giving neither product any advantage here.

Connectivity fundamentals are identical on both tablets: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, USB 3.2 Type-C, and matched theoretical download and upload speeds. Neither device includes a cellular module, NFC, or HDMI output, so they occupy the same connectivity tier — capable and modern for a Wi-Fi-only large-format tablet, but without the extras that some power users might want.

The software and privacy feature sets are also virtually mirrored, with both offering split-screen, Picture-in-Picture, dynamic theming, on-device machine learning, and a solid suite of privacy controls. The shared absence of features like focus modes or app offloading is equally applicable to both.

Two meaningful differences tip the scales toward the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro. First, it includes a fingerprint scanner, which the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro lacks entirely — a tangible convenience gap for secure, fast unlocking in daily use. Second, the Moto Pad 60 Pro supports Galileo satellite navigation, adding an additional positioning system alongside GPS that can improve location accuracy in challenging environments. Neither advantage is transformative on its own, but together they give the Moto Pad 60 Pro a clear edge in this category.

The only data point in this group is the DDR5 memory standard, which both the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro and the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro share. DDR5 offers higher bandwidth and improved power efficiency compared to its predecessor, and it aligns with the modern Dimensity 8300 platform both tablets are built on — the two specifications are a natural pairing.

With a single shared spec and no differentiating data provided, this category is a complete tie. Neither device holds any advantage here.