Lexar NM1090 Pro 1TB VS Samsung 9100 Pro 4TB

The Lexar NM1090 Pro 1TB offers a sequential read speed of 14000 MB/s and a random read speed of 1650000 IOPS. In comparison, the Samsung 9100 Pro 4TB has a slightly higher sequential read speed of 14800 MB/s, surpassing the Lexar by 800 MB/s. The Samsung drive also outperforms the Lexar in random read speed, achieving 2200000 IOPS, which is 550000 IOPS faster than the Lexar.

Both drives provide high-speed performance, with the Samsung 9100 Pro showing a clear edge in both sequential and random read speeds. However, the Lexar NM1090 Pro still offers impressive speeds, particularly for users who do not require the absolute top-end performance in these areas.

While the Lexar offers solid performance with its sequential read speed and random IOPS, the Samsung 9100 Pro's superior speeds make it a stronger option for those looking for the fastest read performance in both sequential and random scenarios.

The Lexar NM1090 Pro 1TB offers a sequential write speed of 10000 MB/s and a random write speed of 1800000 IOPS. In contrast, the Samsung 9100 Pro 4TB delivers a higher sequential write speed of 13400 MB/s, outperforming the Lexar by 3400 MB/s. Additionally, the Samsung drive has a random write speed of 2600000 IOPS, which is 800000 IOPS faster than the Lexar.

Both drives show strong performance in write speeds, with the Samsung 9100 Pro leading in both sequential and random write speeds. The Lexar NM1090 Pro, while offering slightly lower speeds, still provides solid write performance suitable for many use cases.

In summary, the Samsung 9100 Pro stands out with its superior write speeds, making it a better choice for users who prioritize maximum write performance, while the Lexar NM1090 Pro remains a competitive option for those with more moderate needs.

The Lexar NM1090 Pro 1TB has a PassMark result of 74037, while the Samsung 9100 Pro 4TB has a higher PassMark result of 88718. This indicates that the Samsung drive achieves better overall benchmark performance compared to the Lexar.

Both drives provide impressive results in terms of performance, with the Samsung 9100 Pro showing a clear advantage in the PassMark score. This score reflects the overall speed and efficiency of each drive under test conditions.

In summary, the Samsung 9100 Pro outperforms the Lexar NM1090 Pro in the benchmark tests, with a noticeable gap in the PassMark results, which may suggest superior overall performance in real-world usage scenarios.

Both the Lexar NM1090 Pro 1TB and the Samsung 9100 Pro 4TB are M.2 NVMe SSDs with DRAM cache, supporting NVMe version 2 and PCIe version 5. They both feature 8 controller channels and use TLC NAND storage. The Lexar offers 1000GB of internal storage, while the Samsung provides significantly more at 4000GB.

In terms of endurance, the Lexar has a Terabytes Written (TBW) rating of 700, while the Samsung drives a much higher TBW rating of 2400, which suggests a higher endurance for the Samsung model. Both products have the same MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) of 1.5 million hours and come with a 5-year warranty. Neither has an integrated heatsink or RGB lighting.

Overall, the primary differences between these two products are the storage capacity and the TBW rating, with the Samsung 9100 Pro offering significantly more capacity and higher endurance, while the Lexar NM1090 Pro provides a more moderate storage size.