LG 65QNED82AUA 65" VS LG 86NANO81A6A 86"

The display specifications of the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ and the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ share some similarities, but there are also notable differences. Both models offer a 4K (UHD) resolution with 3840 x 2160 pixels and feature a 10-bit color depth, supporting 1070 million display colors. However, the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ uses a more advanced Mini-LED backlighting system, while the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ uses a traditional LED-backlit LCD. Both displays also share the same pixel density of 68 ppi for the 65″ model and 51 ppi for the 86″ model, which reflects the difference in screen sizes.

In terms of color and HDR support, both products support HDR10 and HLG, but the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ has an advantage with support for HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, which the 65QNED82AUA 65″ does not offer. Both models have anti-reflection coating and an ambient light sensor, ensuring optimal viewing under various lighting conditions. Their maximum horizontal and vertical viewing angles are identical, at 178º each, so both should provide consistent picture quality even from off-angles.

The refresh rate for both models is 60Hz, which is standard for most TVs in this range. In terms of size, the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ has a screen size of 65.1″, while the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ offers a much larger 86″ display. While both displays share the same resolution, the difference in size impacts pixel density, with the 65″ model offering a sharper image due to its higher ppi.

In terms of connectivity, both the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ and the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ are quite similar, but there are a few differences. Both models feature Bluetooth connectivity, though the 65QNED82AUA 65″ uses Bluetooth version 5, while the 86NANO81A6A 86″ is equipped with Bluetooth version 5.1. Additionally, both models come with three HDMI 2.1 ports, ensuring compatibility with high-bandwidth devices. Both also support Wi-Fi, with both products offering Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) standards for internet connectivity.

When it comes to USB ports, the 65QNED82AUA 65″ has one USB port, while the 86NANO81A6A 86″ provides two USB ports, offering more flexibility for connecting devices. Both models include one RJ45 port for wired network connections and support Miracast for wireless screen sharing.

The 65QNED82AUA 65″ does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack socket, while the 86NANO81A6A 86″ does. Both models lack an external memory slot, VGA connector, and DVI connector, so there is no difference in that regard. Overall, the two products have similar connectivity features, with the 86NANO81A6A 86″ having a slight advantage in Bluetooth version, USB ports, and the inclusion of the audio jack socket.

The audio specifications of the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ and the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ are largely identical, with both models supporting Dolby Digital, Digital Out, and Dolby Digital Plus. Both TVs also feature stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos, and Dolby Audio, ensuring high-quality sound experiences. Additionally, neither model includes SRS TheaterSound HD or a subwoofer, so there are no significant differences in their audio systems in that regard.

Both the 65QNED82AUA 65″ and the 86NANO81A6A 86″ support Dolby Virtual, though neither product offers this feature. In terms of connectivity, both models are equipped with HDMI ARC and HDMI eARC, which allow for high-quality audio transmission to compatible external audio systems.

In summary, the audio capabilities of both the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ and the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ are very similar, with no notable differences in the key audio features like surround sound technologies and output options.

The design specifications of the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ and the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ show significant differences in size and weight. The LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ has a width of 1455.4 mm, a height of 840.7 mm, and a thickness of 50.8 mm, weighing 23,179 g. In contrast, the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ is much larger, with a width of 1927 mm, a height of 1104 mm, and a thickness of 59.9 mm, and it weighs 48,900 g. This makes the 86″ model notably bulkier, both in terms of dimensions and weight.

Additionally, the volume of the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ is 127,431.7392 cm³, which is more than double the volume of the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ at 62,156.582824 cm³. Despite these size differences, both models support VESA mounting, allowing for flexible wall mounting options.

Overall, the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ is significantly larger and heavier than the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″, but both offer similar design features, including VESA compatibility for wall mounting.

The LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ and the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ have nearly identical feature sets. Both models support AirPlay, built-in smart TV functionality, and are compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa. They also support a remote smartphone and offer voice command functionality. Both models have USB recording capabilities, a search browser, a sleep timer, and a child lock feature. Additionally, both have a standby power consumption of 0.5W and come with a 1-year warranty period.

Neither model supports Siri/Apple HomeKit, and neither includes a rechargeable remote control. The features are very consistent between the two products, with no significant differences in the functionality they offer.

In conclusion, the LG 65QNED82AUA 65″ and the LG 86NANO81A6A 86″ provide almost identical features, including smart functionality and energy-saving options, with no major differences in their feature sets.