LG 86QNED82AUA 86" VS Samsung QN75Q6FAAFXZA 75"

The LG 86QNED82AUA 86″ and Samsung QN75Q6FAAFXZA 75″ both feature 4K (UHD) resolutions with a pixel count of 3840 x 2160 px, ensuring clear and sharp images. However, the LG model has a slightly larger screen size at 86.4″ compared to the Samsung's 74.5″. This results in a difference in pixel density, with the LG offering 51 ppi and the Samsung at 59 ppi. The Samsung’s higher pixel density suggests it may offer finer detail at a similar resolution, but the difference is unlikely to be very noticeable on a large screen unless viewed from very close.

Both TVs have 10-bit color depth and support HDR10 and HLG for improved image quality, but the Samsung has an edge with its additional support for HDR10+ (while the LG does not). Neither model supports Dolby Vision. As for display type, the LG uses a combination of LED-backlit, LCD, and Mini-LED technology, while the Samsung uses QLED along with LED-backlit, LCD, which might lead to slightly different visual experiences in terms of color vibrancy and contrast.

In terms of viewing angles, both the LG and Samsung offer the same maximum horizontal and vertical viewing angles of 178º, so you can expect wide and consistent image quality when viewing from different positions. The LG includes AMD FreeSync for adaptive synchronization, which can reduce screen tearing, but the Samsung lacks any adaptive synchronization feature. Both models have anti-reflection coatings and ambient light sensors to enhance viewing comfort in various lighting conditions.

Both the LG 86QNED82AUA 86″ and Samsung QN75Q6FAAFXZA 75″ offer Bluetooth connectivity, with the LG supporting Bluetooth version 5 and the Samsung supporting the newer Bluetooth 5.3. Both models feature HDMI 2.1 with 3 HDMI ports, which allows for high-quality video and audio transfer, as well as advanced features like variable refresh rate. Both products also support Wi-Fi, using Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), so you can easily connect to the internet wirelessly with similar performance on both devices.

In terms of wired connections, both models include 1 USB port and 1 RJ45 port for Ethernet, ensuring solid options for external devices and stable internet access. Additionally, both models support Miracast for wireless screen sharing. Neither TV has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, an external memory slot, a VGA connector, or a DVI connector, so those looking for these types of ports will not find them on either model.

The main difference between the two products in this connectivity group is the Bluetooth version, with the Samsung offering the more recent Bluetooth 5.3, compared to the LG’s Bluetooth 5.0. Otherwise, the specifications across both models are almost identical, with both offering a solid selection of wireless and wired connectivity options.

Both the LG 86QNED82AUA 86″ and Samsung QN75Q6FAAFXZA 75″ support Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, and Digital Out, ensuring high-quality sound and connectivity options for external audio devices. Both also feature stereo speakers, but the LG model goes a step further with Dolby Atmos support, which enhances the sound experience with more immersive, three-dimensional audio. The Samsung lacks Dolby Atmos but includes Dolby Audio, which provides audio improvements similar to Dolby Digital Plus but without the spatial enhancements of Atmos.

Neither TV includes a subwoofer, so the low-end audio might not be as pronounced compared to models with dedicated bass units. Both models support HDMI ARC and HDMI eARC, which enables easy connection to soundbars or AV receivers for better audio performance through a single HDMI cable.

In terms of audio features, the main distinction is the inclusion of Dolby Atmos in the LG model, which is not present on the Samsung. Both TVs support Dolby Audio, but the LG offers a more advanced audio experience with its Atmos technology.

The LG 86QNED82AUA 86″ and Samsung QN75Q6FAAFXZA 75″ differ in their physical dimensions. The LG model is wider at 1927.9 mm compared to the Samsung's 1668.8 mm, making it significantly larger in overall width. The LG is also taller, measuring 1107.4 mm, while the Samsung stands at 957.6 mm. Despite its larger size, the LG is heavier, weighing 32,387 g, compared to the Samsung’s 22,816 g, reflecting the larger screen size and potentially different build materials.

In terms of thickness, the Samsung is thicker at 76.2 mm, while the LG is thinner at 50.8 mm. This could make the LG model more streamlined, while the Samsung may have a bulkier design. The volume of the two models also differs, with the Samsung having a larger total volume at 121,770.87 cm³ compared to the LG’s 108,455.79 cm³, which aligns with its thicker build.

Both models support VESA mounting, so you can easily mount them to the wall if desired. However, the physical differences in size and weight suggest that the LG model will require more wall support due to its larger size and heavier weight, whereas the Samsung’s more compact dimensions might make it easier to mount on a variety of wall setups.

Both the LG 86QNED82AUA 86″ and Samsung QN75Q6FAAFXZA 75″ come with AirPlay support, built-in smart TV functionality, and compatibility with Google Assistant and Alexa, allowing for easy integration into a smart home setup. However, the Samsung model stands out with its additional support for Siri/Apple HomeKit, which the LG does not have. Both models also support remote smartphone control, but neither includes a rechargeable remote control.

In terms of power consumption, the LG consumes 181W during operation, while the Samsung uses slightly less at 151W. Both models have identical standby power consumption at 0.5W. They also offer useful features such as a search browser, sleep timer, and child lock. Additionally, both TVs come with a one-year warranty period and support voice commands for hands-free operation.

Both products share many features, but the key difference lies in the Samsung’s support for Siri/Apple HomeKit, which the LG lacks. Additionally, the Samsung is more power-efficient in terms of operating power consumption.