LG 86QNED9MAUA 86" VS Philips 75MLED950/12 75"

The LG 86QNED9MAUA 86″ and Philips 75MLED950/12 75″ both feature a 4K UHD resolution (3840 x 2160 px) and share a 10-bit color depth with 1070 million display colors, providing vibrant, detailed images. However, their screen sizes differ, with the LG model being significantly larger at 86.4″, compared to the 75″ display of the Philips model. This results in a slight difference in pixel density, with the LG model having 51 ppi and the Philips model slightly higher at 59 ppi.

Both models have a 144Hz refresh rate and support AMD FreeSync for smoother gameplay. The Philips model additionally supports AMD FreeSync Premium, which is not mentioned for the LG. For HDR, both TVs support HDR10, Dolby Vision, and HLG, but the Philips model also supports HDR10+ while the LG does not.

When it comes to viewing angles, both products offer wide horizontal and vertical viewing angles of up to 178º. They also both have an anti-reflection coating and an ambient light sensor to enhance the viewing experience in different lighting conditions.

Both the LG 86QNED9MAUA 86″ and Philips 75MLED950/12 75″ come with Bluetooth support, though the LG model has Bluetooth version 5.3, while the Philips model has Bluetooth version 5.2. In terms of HDMI, both models support HDMI 2.1, but the LG offers 3 HDMI ports, while the Philips provides 4 HDMI ports.

For Wi-Fi connectivity, the LG supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and the more advanced Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) as well as Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), which gives it an edge in terms of wireless capabilities. The Philips, on the other hand, supports Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, and only Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), lacking support for Wi-Fi 6E.

Both models include two USB ports and one RJ45 port for wired connections. The LG model lacks a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack and an external memory slot, while the Philips has a 3.5 mm audio jack socket but no external memory slot. Neither model includes a VGA or DVI connector. Additionally, both TVs support Miracast for wireless screen sharing.

Both the LG 86QNED9MAUA 86″ and Philips 75MLED950/12 75″ support Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, and Digital Out. However, the LG model supports Dolby Digital Plus, while the Philips does not. Both TVs have stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos, and Dolby Audio support for enhanced sound quality. Neither model includes SRS TheaterSound HD or Dolby Virtual audio features.

The LG model lacks a subwoofer and DTS:X support, while the Philips includes both a subwoofer and DTS:X, providing a potentially more immersive sound experience. For connectivity, both models support HDMI ARC and HDMI eARC for high-quality audio output through compatible devices.

Overall, while both products offer solid audio features, the Philips has additional support for DTS:X and a subwoofer, while the LG offers Dolby Digital Plus but lacks those extra audio enhancements.

The LG 86QNED9MAUA 86″ and Philips 75MLED950/12 75″ both support VESA mounts, allowing for easy wall mounting. The LG model is larger, with a width of 1927.9 mm and a height of 1115.1 mm, while the Philips is slightly smaller, with a width of 1672 mm and a height of 962 mm.

In terms of weight, the LG model is notably heavier at 45495 g compared to the Philips at 35370 g. The LG is also thinner at 50.8 mm, while the Philips has a slightly thicker profile at 61 mm.

Regarding overall volume, the LG has a volume of 109209.91 cm³, while the Philips has a smaller volume of 98116.30 cm³, reflecting its more compact design.

Both the LG 86QNED9MAUA 86″ and Philips 75MLED950/12 75″ feature built-in smart TV functionality, support AirPlay, and are compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa. Neither model works with Siri or Apple HomeKit, though both support remote smartphone control and USB recording. Additionally, both TVs have a search browser, sleep timer, child lock, and voice command capabilities.

The two models differ in operating power consumption. The LG uses 209W of power during operation, while the Philips uses only 126W. Both TVs have the same standby power consumption of 0.5W and lack a rechargeable remote control.