LG OLED65C5PUA 65" VS Sony Bravia K-65XR80M2 65"

Both the LG OLED65C5PUA and the Sony Bravia XR80M2 share an identical display specification profile at their core: both are OLED/AMOLED panels running at 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) resolution with a 68 ppi pixel density, 10-bit color depth rendering 1.07 billion colors, and a native 120Hz refresh rate. In practical terms, this means both TVs deliver the hallmark OLED advantages — perfect blacks, infinite contrast, and wide color volume — with motion smooth enough for high-frame-rate content and gaming.

HDR format support is also a mirror image between the two: both handle HDR10, Dolby Vision, and HLG, but neither supports HDR10+. This is a meaningful shared limitation for users invested in the Amazon/Samsung HDR10+ ecosystem, though Dolby Vision coverage ensures compatibility with the vast majority of streaming HDR content. Both panels also feature anti-reflection coatings, ambient light sensors, and identical 178° horizontal and vertical viewing angles — the widest possible, as expected from OLED technology.

The only measurable difference between the two is physical screen size: the LG measures 65.1″ while the Sony comes in at 64.5″ — a gap of just 0.6 inches that is imperceptible in real-world viewing. Based strictly on the provided display specs, these two TVs are effectively tied. Neither holds a meaningful display advantage over the other; the decision between them should rest on other spec groups such as processing, audio, or connectivity.

Wireless connectivity is a wash between the two: both TVs sport Bluetooth 5.3 and identical Wi-Fi support spanning Wi-Fi 4 through Wi-Fi 6E. The inclusion of Wi-Fi 6E is particularly noteworthy — it opens access to the less-congested 6GHz band, which translates to lower latency and more stable streaming in environments with many competing wireless devices. Miracast screen mirroring is also present on both.

The wired side tells a nearly identical story as well — four HDMI 2.1 ports and one RJ45 ethernet port on each unit. HDMI 2.1 is the right standard for 2025-era televisions, supporting 4K at 120Hz and features like Variable Refresh Rate passthrough from consoles and PCs. The one concrete difference emerges in USB: the LG OLED65C5PUA includes 3 USB ports versus 2 on the Sony Bravia XR80M2. For users who regularly connect USB storage drives, webcams, or other peripherals simultaneously, that extra port removes the need for a hub.

Overall, the LG holds a narrow edge in connectivity strictly due to the additional USB port. Everything else — wireless standards, HDMI count and version, and ethernet — is identical. It is a minor practical advantage rather than a decisive one, but for users with USB-heavy setups it is a real convenience the Sony cannot match.

The audio feature sets of these two TVs are remarkably close. Both carry a strong shared foundation: built-in subwoofers, Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, DTS-HD High Resolution, and full HDMI ARC/eARC support. The presence of eARC is worth highlighting — it carries enough bandwidth to pass lossless audio formats like Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio to a compatible soundbar or AV receiver, making it an important feature for home theater setups that go beyond the TV's built-in speakers.

The single differentiator in this group is Dolby Digital Plus, which the Sony Bravia XR80M2 supports and the LG OLED65C5PUA does not. Dolby Digital Plus is an enhanced codec used widely by streaming platforms — including Netflix and Disney+ — to deliver higher-bitrate, more detailed surround sound than standard Dolby Digital. Its absence on the LG means that in certain streaming scenarios, audio may be downgraded to the older Dolby Digital codec rather than the richer DD+ stream.

That gap hands the Sony a narrow but real audio edge. For users who rely primarily on an external soundbar or AV receiver via eARC, the practical impact is minimal since those devices handle decoding independently. But for viewers leaning on the TV's own speakers or ARC-connected equipment that depends on the TV's decoding, the Sony's Dolby Digital Plus support delivers a more complete out-of-the-box audio experience.

At roughly the same screen size, these two TVs occupy nearly identical wall space — width and height differ by just a few millimeters. The meaningful design divergence lies in two competing physical attributes: thickness and weight. The Sony Bravia XR80M2 is significantly slimmer at 34 mm deep versus 45.7 mm for the LG OLED65C5PUA — a 25% reduction that makes a visible difference when wall-mounted, giving the Sony a more flush, architectural look against the wall.

The LG, however, fights back on weight. At 18.5 kg compared to the Sony's 22.9 kg, it is approximately 4.4 kg lighter — a substantial difference that matters most during installation. A lighter panel is easier for one or two people to maneuver, position, and mount safely, and it places less long-term stress on wall brackets. Both TVs support VESA mounting and share identical operating temperature ranges, so those factors are a wash.

This group comes down to a genuine trade-off rather than a clear winner. The Sony edges ahead for aesthetics — its slimmer profile will look more refined on a wall. The LG has the advantage for installation and handling thanks to its considerably lower weight. Which factor matters more depends entirely on the buyer's priorities: visual elegance once mounted, or ease of getting it there.

Smart platform parity is complete between these two TVs. Both run built-in smart TV systems with Chromecast, AirPlay, Google Assistant, and Alexa voice control — covering the major ecosystems with the notable shared exception of Siri and Apple HomeKit. USB recording, smartphone remote control, and standard utility features like sleep timers and child lock are also present on both. For the vast majority of users, the day-to-day smart TV experience will feel interchangeable.

Two features break the symmetry. The Sony Bravia XR80M2 includes a rechargeable remote control — a small but genuinely appreciated convenience that eliminates the recurring cost and hassle of disposable batteries. The LG OLED65C5PUA offers no such feature. Far more striking, however, is the operating power consumption gap: the LG is rated at 163.9W while the Sony draws a substantial 397W — more than 2.4 times the power. Over thousands of hours of annual viewing, that difference translates into a meaningfully higher electricity bill for Sony owners.

On balance, the LG holds a clear advantage in this group. The Sony's rechargeable remote is a nice touch, but it cannot offset a power consumption figure that is more than double the LG's. For energy-conscious buyers, the LG's 163.9W draw is a significant long-term cost and environmental consideration that makes it the more practical choice on features and efficiency combined.