LG OLED83B5PUA 83" VS Samsung QN83S85FAE 83"

Both the LG OLED83B5PUA and the Samsung QN83S85FAE share a strong display foundation: identical OLED/AMOLED panel technology, a native 3840 x 2160 resolution at 53 ppi, a 10-bit color pipeline rendering over a billion colors, a 120Hz refresh rate, and wide 178° viewing angles in both axes. In practice, this means both screens deliver the hallmark OLED traits — perfect blacks, infinite contrast, and color accuracy — at a size and refresh rate well suited for both cinematic content and fast-motion sports.

The most consequential split between these two sets lies in HDR format support. The LG supports Dolby Vision but not HDR10+, while the Samsung supports HDR10+ but not Dolby Vision. This is a real-world content compatibility issue: streaming platforms like Netflix and Apple TV+ lean heavily on Dolby Vision, making the LG the stronger pick for those ecosystems. Samsung's HDR10+ advantage, on the other hand, is more relevant to 4K Blu-ray titles and Amazon Prime Video content encoded in that format. Neither format is universally superior in image quality, so the ″right″ choice depends entirely on where the user sources their content. Both sets share HDR10 and HLG support as a common baseline.

For gaming, the LG holds a notable edge: it adds Nvidia G-Sync compatibility on top of the AMD FreeSync and FreeSync Premium tiers that the Samsung also carries. This matters if the user connects a PC with an Nvidia GPU, as G-Sync ensures tear-free, low-latency output that FreeSync alone cannot guarantee on Nvidia hardware. The Samsung is limited to the AMD FreeSync ecosystem. Overall, the LG has a slight advantage for mixed-platform gaming setups and Dolby Vision content, while the Samsung edges ahead specifically for HDR10+ content libraries — making the HDR format question the deciding factor for most buyers.

The wired connectivity foundation is identical across both TVs: 4 HDMI 2.1 ports, 2 USB ports, a single RJ45 ethernet jack, and shared support for Miracast wireless mirroring. HDMI 2.1 is worth highlighting here — it supports the full bandwidth needed for 4K 120Hz signals with VRR from modern consoles, so neither TV is bottlenecked on that front.

Where these two diverge is wireless networking. The LG OLED83B5PUA reaches up to Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), while the Samsung QN83S85FAE tops out at Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). This is a meaningful real-world gap: Wi-Fi 6E operates on the 6GHz band, which is far less congested than the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands used by older standards. In a dense apartment building or a home with many connected devices, the LG is significantly better positioned to maintain stable, high-throughput streaming and reduce interference. For 8K streaming or high-bitrate local network playback, this headroom matters even today.

The DVB tuner support is effectively a wash — both sets cover the major terrestrial, cable, and satellite broadcast standards, just listed in slightly different order, with no practical difference for most markets. With Bluetooth 5.3 shared between both, there is no gap in wireless peripheral connectivity either. The connectivity verdict is clear: the LG holds a tangible advantage purely on the strength of its Wi-Fi 6E support, which future-proofs the set for increasingly congested home networks and faster wireless standards.

Across every audio specification provided, the LG OLED83B5PUA and the Samsung QN83S85FAE are a perfect match. Both carry Dolby Atmos and Dolby Audio decoding, stereo speaker configurations, HDMI ARC and eARC support, and digital audio output — with neither including a built-in subwoofer or Dolby Virtual processing.

The practical upshot of shared eARC support is worth noting: unlike standard ARC, eARC carries enough bandwidth to pass lossless audio formats — such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio — directly to a compatible soundbar or AV receiver. This makes both TVs equally capable as a hub in a higher-end audio chain without needing a separate optical or HDMI connection for audio.

There is no differentiator to call out here. On audio specifications alone, these two TVs are evenly matched in every category provided, and neither holds an advantage over the other.

At nearly the same screen size, the footprint of these two TVs is almost identical in width and height — but their physical profiles tell very different stories. The Samsung QN83S85FAE is dramatically slimmer at 34.9 mm thick compared to the LG OLED83B5PUA's 53.3 mm, and its calculated volume is roughly 34% smaller. For wall-mount installations where minimizing the gap between panel and wall is a priority, the Samsung has a clear aesthetic advantage.

Weight, however, flips the equation. Despite its slimmer chassis, the Samsung is considerably heavier at 33,900 g versus the LG's 27,714 g — a difference of over 6 kg. That gap is highly relevant during installation: heavier panels place greater stress on wall mounts and typically require two people to safely maneuver. It also suggests the Samsung's thinner profile is achieved through a denser internal construction rather than a lighter one, which is worth factoring into mounting hardware selection.

One understated but practical difference is the minimum operating temperature: the LG is rated down to 0 °C, while the Samsung's floor is 10 °C. This matters for installations in garages, sunrooms, or other semi-conditioned spaces that can dip near freezing. Overall, neither TV has a sweep advantage in design — the Samsung wins on slim profile, the LG wins on weight and cold-environment flexibility — so the better choice depends on the specific installation context.

From a smart platform and ecosystem standpoint, these two TVs are functionally identical. Both offer a built-in smart TV experience with AirPlay, Google Assistant, and Alexa integration, while neither supports Siri or Apple HomeKit. That shared omission is worth flagging for users deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem — neither TV can be natively controlled through the Home app or Siri Shortcuts, despite both supporting AirPlay for content mirroring.

Power consumption is virtually indistinguishable: the LG draws 195.5W in operation versus the Samsung's 197W, and both idle at 0.5W in standby. At that margin, neither will produce a noticeable difference on an electricity bill regardless of usage volume. Utility features — USB recording, sleep timer, child lock, smartphone remote, and voice commands — are also a complete match, as is the 1-year warranty period on both units.

There is no meaningful differentiator to identify in this category. Every feature present on one TV is present on the other, and the single numerical difference in power draw is too small to influence a purchasing decision. On features, these two TVs are evenly matched in every respect the provided data covers.