LG OLED97G5WUA 97" VS Xiaomi TV S Pro Mini LED 2026 75"

The most fundamental difference here is panel technology. The LG OLED97G5WUA uses an OLED panel, which means each pixel produces its own light and can switch off completely — delivering absolute blacks, infinite contrast, and superior per-pixel precision. The Xiaomi TV S Pro Mini LED 2026 uses a Mini-LED LCD panel, which relies on a dense backlight array behind an LCD layer. While Mini-LED has closed the gap with OLED significantly — especially in peak brightness and longevity — it still cannot match OLED's black levels or contrast in a dark room. That said, Mini-LED panels can often sustain higher brightness over large areas, which can be an advantage in bright living rooms.

On refresh rate and HDR format support, the Xiaomi holds a measurable edge. Its 144Hz refresh rate outpaces the LG's 120Hz, which matters most for fast-motion content and gaming. The Xiaomi also supports HDR10+ — a dynamic HDR format the LG lacks — meaning it can apply scene-by-scene tone mapping on HDR10+ encoded content, whereas the LG relies on Dolby Vision for dynamic metadata (both support Dolby Vision and HLG). For pixel density, the Xiaomi's smaller 75″ screen results in 59 ppi versus the LG's 45 ppi at 97.4″, meaning individual pixels are less visible up close on the Xiaomi — though at typical TV viewing distances, neither difference is likely to be perceptible.

In summary, neither product is a clean overall winner in this group — each has a distinct advantage. The LG OLED97G5WUA wins on panel quality and sheer screen real estate, offering the cinematic blacks and contrast that OLED uniquely provides on a massive 97″ canvas. The Xiaomi TV S Pro Mini LED 2026 wins on refresh rate and HDR format breadth. If picture quality in a controlled environment is the priority, the LG's OLED has the edge; if gaming fluidity and HDR format versatility matter more, the Xiaomi has the upper hand.

Both TVs share a strong connectivity foundation — HDMI 2.1, dual-band Wi-Fi support, Ethernet, and Miracast are present on both. Where they diverge is in the depth of that offering. The LG OLED97G5WUA steps ahead with 4 HDMI 2.1 ports versus the Xiaomi's 3, and adds 3 USB ports to the Xiaomi's 2. For users building a multi-device home theater setup — game consoles, streaming sticks, AV receivers, Blu-ray players — that extra HDMI port is a practical convenience that eliminates the need for a separate HDMI switch.

The wireless gap is more significant. The LG supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), which extends Wi-Fi 6 into the 6 GHz band — a less congested frequency that delivers lower latency and more consistent throughput in busy network environments. The Xiaomi tops out at Wi-Fi 6, which is still capable but lacks access to that cleaner 6 GHz spectrum. Similarly, the LG's Bluetooth 5.3 is a minor but real step above the Xiaomi's 5.2, offering marginally improved connection stability and energy efficiency. On the Xiaomi's side, the inclusion of a 3.5 mm audio jack — absent on the LG — is a small but occasionally useful outlet for headphones or legacy audio devices.

Overall, the LG OLED97G5WUA holds a clear edge in connectivity. The combination of an additional HDMI port, one more USB port, a newer Bluetooth version, and especially Wi-Fi 6E support adds up to a more future-ready and flexible connectivity suite. The Xiaomi's 3.5 mm jack is the lone area where it offers something the LG does not, but that advantage is unlikely to tip the scales for most users.

The audio specs for these two TVs are remarkably close, with both packing Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, Dolby Audio, HDMI eARC, and stereo speakers. That shared foundation means both are well-equipped to pass through or process object-based surround formats — whether from a soundbar, AV receiver, or their own internal speakers. The eARC port on both is particularly valuable, as it allows a connected soundbar to receive full-bandwidth lossless audio from the TV's apps without needing a separate connection.

The two meaningful points of divergence cut in opposite directions. The LG OLED97G5WUA includes a built-in subwoofer, which the Xiaomi lacks — a tangible hardware advantage for low-frequency output directly from the TV's speaker system, adding weight to explosions, music, and cinematic bass without any external equipment. The Xiaomi TV S Pro Mini LED 2026, on the other hand, supports Dolby Digital Plus, an enhanced compressed audio codec that carries more audio data than standard Dolby Digital and is commonly used in streaming services. The LG does not list this support.

On balance, the LG OLED97G5WUA holds a slight edge for users who prioritize standalone speaker performance, since a built-in subwoofer is a more immediately impactful hardware differentiator than codec support. However, for users planning to route all audio through an external soundbar or receiver anyway, the Xiaomi's Dolby Digital Plus support becomes more relevant, and the subwoofer advantage disappears entirely. The two are closely matched, with the winner depending heavily on how the user intends to consume audio.

Screen size accounts for most of the dimensional gap here — the LG is a 97.4″ panel against the Xiaomi's 75″, so its greater width and height are expected. What is genuinely striking is the thickness comparison: the LG OLED97G5WUA measures just 27.9 mm deep, while the Xiaomi TV S Pro Mini LED 2026 is 73 mm — more than 2.5 times thicker. This is a direct consequence of their respective panel technologies: OLED panels are self-emissive and require no backlight assembly, enabling that ultra-slim profile, whereas Mini-LED requires a physical backlight layer behind the LCD panel, adding unavoidable depth.

The volume figures make this even more telling. Despite having a dramatically larger screen, the LG's total physical volume (~73,880 cm³) is actually less than the Xiaomi's (~116,580 cm³), meaning the Xiaomi occupies more space in a room even though it is the smaller TV. Weight tells a different story: the LG comes in at 64 kg versus the Xiaomi's 26.2 kg — more than double. That mass difference has real installation implications; wall-mounting the LG will require a reinforced mount, professional installation, and careful wall-stud assessment in most homes.

Both support VESA mounting and share identical operating temperature ranges, so those points are a draw. Overall, the design group has no single winner — it is a genuine trade-off. The LG's 27.9 mm profile is a remarkable aesthetic achievement that will sit flush and sleek against any wall, but its weight demands serious planning. The Xiaomi is far easier to handle and install, though its depth means it will protrude noticeably, even on a wall mount.

Smart platform parity is substantial between these two — both offer Chromecast built-in, AirPlay, Google Assistant, smartphone remote support, USB recording, and a full browser. For the vast majority of users, day-to-day smart TV functionality will feel essentially identical. The one ecosystem distinction is that the LG OLED97G5WUA also supports Amazon Alexa, which the Xiaomi does not. For households already invested in Alexa-controlled smart home devices, that integration allows the LG to fit more naturally into an existing voice ecosystem without workarounds.

Power consumption is a practical differentiator worth noting. The Xiaomi TV S Pro Mini LED 2026 draws 350W during operation versus the LG's 300W — a 17% difference. Considering the LG has a screen nearly 30 inches larger, that gap is particularly notable; the smaller Xiaomi consuming more power at runtime is a direct consequence of Mini-LED backlighting, which requires driving a large number of LEDs simultaneously. Standby consumption is identical at 0.5W for both.

The most consequential gap in this group, however, is warranty coverage. The LG OLED97G5WUA comes with a 5-year warranty against the Xiaomi's 1 year — a stark difference for products at this price tier. A five-year warranty provides meaningful long-term purchase protection and signals manufacturer confidence in panel durability. That alone gives the LG a clear and significant overall edge in this group, compounded further by its lower power draw and broader voice assistant compatibility.