Manli Gallardo GeForce RTX 5090 OC VS Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Solid

Both cards share an identical foundation: the same 2017 MHz base clock, 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, and 1750 MHz memory speed. This means that under light or sustained workloads where the GPU doesn't fully boost, the two cards are effectively indistinguishable in architecture and throughput potential.

The meaningful separation appears under peak boost conditions. The Manli Gallardo OC reaches a 2482 MHz turbo clock versus the Zotac Solid's 2407 MHz — a 75 MHz advantage that directly cascades into every derived performance metric. This translates to a higher pixel rate of 436.8 GPixel/s (vs 423.6), a floating-point performance of 108 TFLOPS (vs 104.8), and a texture rate of 1688 GTexels/s (vs 1637). In real-world terms, the higher turbo clock gives the Manli a consistent edge in GPU-bound scenarios — particularly in rasterization-heavy workloads, high-resolution rendering, and compute tasks — where peak throughput is the bottleneck.

The performance edge clearly belongs to the Manli Gallardo OC, courtesy of its factory overclock pushing a higher sustained boost frequency. The gap is modest — roughly 3% across the board — so users won't see dramatic frame rate differences, but the Manli does deliver measurably more headroom out of the box without any manual tuning required.

The Manli Gallardo GeForce RTX 5090 OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Solid both offer 32GB of VRAM, ensuring ample memory for demanding tasks. Both GPUs are equipped with GDDR7 memory, providing the latest in memory technology, and feature a 512-bit memory bus width, offering broad memory access for high-performance operations.

However, there is a slight difference in effective memory speed. The Manli GPU boasts an effective memory speed of 30000 MHz, while the Zotac GPU has a slightly lower effective memory speed of 28000 MHz. This results in a marginal difference in memory throughput between the two products.

Both models have a very close maximum memory bandwidth, with the Manli achieving 1792 GB/s and the Zotac slightly behind at 1790 GB/s. Both products also support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring data integrity during intensive computational tasks.

The Manli Gallardo GeForce RTX 5090 OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Solid are nearly identical in terms of features. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring compatibility with modern gaming and graphics applications. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS, making them well-suited for immersive, high-performance experiences.

Additionally, both products do not feature XeSS (XMX) support and both are equipped with Intel Resizable BAR, which allows for optimized communication between the CPU and GPU. Neither product has LHR (Lite Hash Rate), indicating that they are not limited in terms of mining performance.

On the aesthetic side, both models come with RGB lighting for customization, and both can support up to 4 displays simultaneously. There are no differences between the two in terms of these features.

Both the Manli Gallardo GeForce RTX 5090 OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Solid share identical port configurations. Each model features 1 HDMI port with HDMI 2.1b support, 3 DisplayPort outputs, and no USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

These port setups offer the same display connectivity options, ensuring both products are capable of supporting high-definition video output across multiple monitors with modern HDMI and DisplayPort standards.

As a result, there are no differences in the ports and connectivity features between the two products.

The Manli Gallardo GeForce RTX 5090 OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Solid are built on the same GPU architecture, Blackwell, and share identical specifications for thermal design power (TDP) at 575W, PCI Express version 5, semiconductor size at 5 nm, and the number of transistors at 92,200 million.

Neither model has air-water cooling, so cooling solutions are likely to be traditional air-based. The main difference between the two products lies in their physical dimensions. The Manli model is wider at 359 mm and taller at 145 mm, while the Zotac model is more compact, with a width of 329.7 mm and a height of 137.8 mm.

Overall, these products share the same core specifications, with the only notable difference being the size, with the Manli GPU being slightly larger than the Zotac GPU.