TurboVS
Micron 4600 512GB
Orico OG7000 2TB

Micron 4600 512GB Orico OG7000 2TB

Common Features

  • ✓ Both products are M2 form factor.
  • ✓ Both products are NVMe SSDs.
  • ✓ Both products use TLC SSD storage type.
  • ✓ Both products have 8 controller channels.
  • ✓ Both products come with a 5-year warranty period.
  • ✓ Neither product has an integrated heatsink.
  • ✓ Neither product has RGB lighting.
  • ✓ Both products use a PCIe interface.
  • ✓ Both products support encryption, but with different encryption levels.
  • ✓ Both products are solid-state drives.
  • ✓ Both products have different cache types.
  • ✓ Both products are based on NAND flash memory.
  • ✓ Both products are designed for high-performance tasks.
  • ✓ Both products are intended for consumer and professional use.
  • ✓ Both products are designed for reliable and long-term use.
  • ✓ Both products are part of the same category of storage solutions.
  • ✓ Both products offer significant read and write speeds.

Main Differences

  • • Sequential read speed is 10300 MB/s on Micron 4600 512GB and 7450 MB/s on Orico OG7000 2TB.
  • • Sequential write speed is 5780 MB/s on Micron 4600 512GB and 5600 MB/s on Orico OG7000 2TB.
  • • SSD cache is DRAM on Micron 4600 512GB and HMB (Host Memory Buffer) on Orico OG7000 2TB.
  • • Internal storage is 512GB on Micron 4600 512GB and 2000GB on Orico OG7000 2TB.
  • • The controller is Silicon Motion SM2508 on Micron 4600 512GB and MaxioTech MAP1602A Falcon Lite on Orico OG7000 2TB.
  • • PCI Express (PCIe) version is 5 on Micron 4600 512GB and 4 on Orico OG7000 2TB.
  • • Terabytes Written (TBW) is 300 on Micron 4600 512GB and 1000 on Orico OG7000 2TB.
  • • Bits of encryption supported is 256 on Micron 4600 512GB and 0 on Orico OG7000 2TB.
Specs Comparison
Micron 4600 512GB

Micron 4600 512GB

Orico OG7000 2TB

Orico OG7000 2TB

Read speed:
sequential read speed 10300 MB/s 7450 MB/s

The Micron 4600 512GB has a sequential read speed of 10300 MB/s, significantly faster than the Orico OG7000 2TB, which has a sequential read speed of 7450 MB/s.

Both products offer high sequential read speeds, but the Micron 4600 is notably faster by 2850 MB/s. The Orico OG7000, while slower, still delivers strong performance at 7450 MB/s, suitable for many use cases.

Neither product has any additional read speed specifications provided beyond the sequential read speeds mentioned above.

Write speed:
sequential write speed 5780 MB/s 5600 MB/s

The Micron 4600 512GB offers a sequential write speed of 5780 MB/s, which is slightly faster than the Orico OG7000 2TB's sequential write speed of 5600 MB/s.

Both drives deliver solid write performance, with the Micron 4600 achieving a 180 MB/s higher sequential write speed than the Orico OG7000. This difference, while not massive, could have an impact in workloads where write speed is a key factor.

There are no additional write speed specifications provided for either product beyond the sequential write speeds mentioned above.

General info:
type M2 M2
SSD cache DRAM cache HMB (Host Memory Buffer)
Is an NVMe SSD ✓ ✓
internal storage 512GB 2000GB
release date February 2025 May 2025
controller Silicon Motion SM2508 MaxioTech MAP1602A Falcon Lite
SSD storage type TLC TLC
PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 4
Controller channels 8 8
Terabytes Written (TBW) 300 1000
warranty period 5 years 5 years
Has an integrated heatsink ✕ ✕
bits of encryption supported 256 0
has RGB lighting ✕ ✕

The Micron 4600 512GB and Orico OG7000 2TB are both M.2 NVMe SSDs, but they differ in several aspects of their general specifications. The Micron 4600 uses DRAM cache, while the Orico OG7000 utilizes HMB (Host Memory Buffer) for caching. This may affect how the two products handle data in different use cases.

In terms of storage, the Micron 4600 offers 512GB of internal storage, while the Orico OG7000 provides significantly more at 2000GB. Both products use TLC storage, and each has 8 controller channels. The Micron 4600 is equipped with the Silicon Motion SM2508 controller, while the Orico OG7000 uses the MaxioTech MAP1602A Falcon Lite controller.

Both drives are backed by a 5-year warranty. The Micron 4600 supports 256-bit encryption, while the Orico OG7000 does not provide any encryption support. Neither product has an integrated heatsink or RGB lighting. Additionally, the Micron 4600 supports PCIe 5.0, while the Orico OG7000 supports PCIe 4.0. The Micron 4600 has a Terabytes Written (TBW) rating of 300, while the Orico OG7000 has a much higher TBW rating of 1000.

Comparison Summary

This is a specification comparison between Micron 4600 512GB and Orico OG7000 2TB. Both products are M2 form factor NVMe SSDs with 8 controller channels and a 5-year warranty. Neither product includes an integrated heatsink or RGB lighting. The Micron 4600 512GB has a sequential read speed of 10300 MB/s and sequential write speed of 5780 MB/s, while the Orico OG7000 2TB features a read speed of 7450 MB/s and write speed of 5600 MB/s. The Micron 4600 512GB uses a DRAM cache, while the Orico OG7000 2TB uses an HMB. Additionally, the Micron 4600 has 512GB of internal storage, compared to 2000GB in the Orico OG7000. The PCIe version is 5 for the Micron 4600, while it is 4 for the Orico OG7000.