Motorola Edge 60 Fusion VS Vivo T4R

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R both offer waterproof designs with an IP68 rating, ensuring they can withstand exposure to water and dust. Both devices also feature a non-rugged build and cannot be folded.

In terms of dimensions, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is slightly lighter at 180.1 g, while the Vivo T4R weighs 183.5 g. The Motorola device has a thickness of 8.25 mm, whereas the Vivo T4R is slimmer with a thickness of 7.4 mm. The height of the Vivo T4R is 163.3 mm, which is slightly taller than the Motorola’s 161.2 mm. The width of the Vivo T4R is 76.7 mm, compared to the Motorola’s 73.08 mm.

Regarding volume, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a slightly larger volume at 97.189092 cm³, while the Vivo T4R comes in at 92.685814 cm³, making it a bit more compact overall.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The screen size of the Motorola is 6.67″, while the Vivo T4R offers a slightly larger 6.77″ display.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a higher pixel density of 446 ppi, compared to the Vivo T4R’s 388 ppi, meaning the Motorola should offer slightly sharper details. In terms of resolution, the Motorola also outperforms with 1220 x 2712 px, compared to the Vivo’s 1080 x 2392 px resolution, providing a more detailed image on the Motorola screen.

Both devices have a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and gaming, but they differ in other features. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion supports HDR10 and HDR10+, enhancing contrast and colors, while the Vivo T4R does not support these standards. Additionally, the Motorola lacks an Always-On Display, unlike the Vivo, which includes this feature. The Motorola also includes branded damage-resistant glass, while the Vivo does not. Neither device supports Dolby Vision or has a secondary screen, and both have touch screens.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R come with 12GB of RAM, offering plenty of memory for multitasking. The Motorola features 512GB of internal storage, which is double the 256GB found in the Vivo T4R. Both devices are powered by a MediaTek chipset, with the Motorola using the Dimensity 7300 and the Vivo using the slightly newer Dimensity 7400.

When it comes to CPU performance, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a clock speed of 4 x 2.5 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz, while the Vivo T4R offers a slightly higher 4 x 2.6 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz configuration. Both devices have 8 CPU threads and use big.LITTLE technology. The GPU in both models is the Mali G615 MC2, with the same clock speed of 1047 MHz.

Other specs for both devices are nearly identical, including RAM speed at 6400 MHz, a 4 nm semiconductor size, and support for 64-bit architecture. Both devices also support DirectX 12 and have integrated graphics. The maximum supported memory for both devices is 16GB, and they each support one display.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R feature dual-lens main cameras, though the setup differs slightly. The Motorola has a 50 MP and 13 MP configuration, with a wide aperture of f/2.2 and f/1.8, while the Vivo T4R features a 50 MP and 2 MP camera setup with a slightly narrower f/2.4 and f/1.8 aperture. Both devices support video recording at 2160 x 30 fps and have phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during video recording, and the ability to record slow-motion videos. Neither phone has optical zoom, but both support creating panoramas in-camera.

The front cameras on both phones are 32 MP, with the Motorola using an aperture of f/2.2 and the Vivo using a slightly wider f/2.45. Both front cameras lack a front-facing LED flash and a dual-lens setup. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Both phones feature built-in HDR mode, manual exposure control, and manual focus for more advanced photography options. They also include the timelapse function and support touch autofocus.

In terms of additional features, both devices lack a BSI sensor but use CMOS sensors. They also both support manual white balance and have serial shot modes, but neither supports laser autofocus or 360° panorama shots. Both phones have a flash, but neither has a dual-tone LED flash or RGB LED flash, and neither supports 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R run on Android 15, providing the same version of the operating system. In terms of privacy and security, both devices have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. Neither phone offers Mail Privacy Protection, but both have theme customization, can block app tracking, and support on-device machine learning. Both phones also support notification permissions, a media picker, and the ability to play games while they download.

Regarding usability features, both devices include dark mode, battery health check, extra dim mode, and dynamic theming. They also support app offloading, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split screen functionality. Neither device gets direct OS updates, and both have Picture-in-Picture (PiP) support. Additionally, both devices can track the current position of a mobile device and support widgets, sharing intents, and a child lock.

Both the Motorola and Vivo phones are free and open source, feature offline voice recognition, and support voice commands. Neither device supports the use of the phone as a PC or has a Quick Start feature. Both phones are also multi-user systems, ensuring that different users can manage their own accounts and preferences on the device.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R both feature non-removable, rechargeable batteries with battery level indicators. The Motorola comes with a 5200 mAh battery, while the Vivo T4R offers a slightly larger 5700 mAh battery, providing more capacity overall.

Both phones support fast charging, but the Motorola supports a faster charging speed of 68W, compared to the Vivo T4R’s 44W. Neither device offers wireless charging support.

Both devices share other battery-related features, such as the ability to recharge their batteries and having a battery level indicator, but there are no further differences in this group apart from their battery power and charging speed.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless audio or USB-C adapters. Both devices come equipped with stereo speakers for enhanced audio output.

Neither phone supports advanced Bluetooth audio technologies such as aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. Additionally, neither device supports LDAC for high-quality wireless audio streaming.

Both the Motorola and Vivo phones do not have a built-in radio, making them reliant on streaming services for radio access.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast data speeds. They both offer dual SIM support and come with Wi-Fi versions ranging from Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) to Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), providing excellent wireless network compatibility. The Bluetooth version on both devices is 5.4, ensuring strong and efficient connections to wireless peripherals.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has an external memory slot, allowing for expanded storage, whereas the Vivo T4R lacks this feature. Both devices have USB Type-C ports with USB version 2 for data transfer and charging. The Motorola device also has NFC support, while the Vivo T4R does not.

In terms of sensors, both phones have a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and a compass, which makes them well-equipped for navigation and motion tracking. However, the Vivo T4R lacks NFC and has no infrared sensor or barometer, just like the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion. Both phones also support Galileo, but neither offers a built-in projector, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo T4R are equipped with a video light, which can help improve low-light photography or video recording. Neither device has sapphire glass displays, ensuring that users do not get the added scratch resistance that sapphire offers.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion features a curved display, offering a more immersive viewing experience with its edges curving around the device, while the Vivo T4R has a flat display. Neither phone includes an e-paper display, which is typically used for low-power, high-contrast reading experiences.