Motorola Edge 60 Fusion VS Vivo Y400 Pro 5G

The most consequential difference in this group is water protection. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion carries an IP68 rating, meaning it is fully waterproof and can withstand submersion in water — typically up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. The Vivo Y400 Pro 5G, by contrast, is rated IP65, which only guarantees protection against low-pressure water jets and splashes. In practice, this means the Edge 60 Fusion can survive a drop in a sink or pool, while the Y400 Pro cannot — a meaningful real-world distinction for users who are active, work outdoors, or are simply accident-prone.

On physical form factor, the two phones trade blows. The Vivo Y400 Pro is noticeably slimmer at 7.7 mm versus the Edge 60 Fusion's 8.25 mm, which translates to a more premium, pocketable feel in hand. Despite being slightly taller and wider, the Y400 Pro also achieves a lower overall volume (94.59 cm³ vs. 97.19 cm³), making it the more compact device geometrically. Weight is essentially a wash — 182 g versus 180.1 g — so neither phone has a handling advantage there.

Overall, the Edge 60 Fusion has a clear edge in this group. The jump from IP65 to IP68 is not a minor spec bump — it represents a fundamentally higher tier of durability that directly reduces risk of water damage. The Y400 Pro counters with a slimmer, slightly more compact chassis, but for most buyers, superior waterproofing is the more practical and protective advantage in daily use.

Both phones share the same OLED/AMOLED panel technology and a 120Hz refresh rate, so the baseline display experience — rich contrast, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling — is comparable. Where they diverge meaningfully is in sharpness and brightness. The Edge 60 Fusion's 446 ppi pixel density, driven by its higher 1220 x 2712 resolution, produces noticeably crisper text and finer detail than the Y400 Pro's 388 ppi. That 58 ppi gap is visible to the naked eye, particularly when reading small text or viewing detailed images. On brightness, the Edge 60 Fusion also leads at 1500 nits versus 1300 nits, which translates to better legibility under direct sunlight — a practical daily advantage.

Each phone holds one exclusive feature worth calling out. The Edge 60 Fusion ships with branded damage-resistant glass and adds HDR10+ support, enabling dynamic tone-mapping for compatible streaming content — a step above the static metadata of standard HDR10 that the Y400 Pro is limited to. On the flip side, the Y400 Pro offers an Always-On Display, letting users glance at the time or notifications without waking the screen — a convenience feature the Edge 60 Fusion lacks entirely.

Taken together, the Edge 60 Fusion holds a clear advantage in display quality. Its sharper panel, higher peak brightness, screen protection, and HDR10+ support outweigh the Y400 Pro's larger screen size and Always-On Display perk. For users who prioritize visual fidelity and outdoor usability, the Edge 60 Fusion is the stronger performer here.

At the silicon level, these two phones are identical. Both run the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 on a 4nm process, pair it with the same Mali G615 MC2 GPU, and clock their cores at the same speeds. Predictably, their benchmark results are also a perfect match — 2932 multi-core and 1026 single-core on Geekbench 6. In day-to-day use, this means users of either phone can expect an essentially identical experience in terms of app launch speeds, gaming frame rates, and general responsiveness.

The only differentiators in this group are RAM and storage. The Edge 60 Fusion ships with 12GB of RAM and 512GB of internal storage, compared to 8GB of RAM and 256GB on the Y400 Pro. The extra RAM on the Edge 60 Fusion is genuinely meaningful — it allows more apps to remain active in the background without being force-closed, which benefits heavy multitaskers and power users. The doubled storage is equally significant for anyone who shoots lots of video, downloads media, or avoids cloud storage.

Given the shared chipset, raw processing performance is a dead tie — but the Edge 60 Fusion holds a practical advantage in this group by offering more RAM and twice the storage at the same performance tier. For users who push their phones hard or simply want more headroom, those differences compound into a noticeably more capable daily driver over time.

The primary cameras share a 50MP main sensor and identical 4K video recording at 30fps, but the secondary lenses tell very different stories. The Edge 60 Fusion's second camera is a 13MP sensor — a genuinely useful shooter for wider or macro shots — while the Y400 Pro's secondary is a mere 2MP depth sensor, which exists almost exclusively to assist portrait mode bokeh calculations and contributes little else of practical value.

Two further advantages compound the Edge 60 Fusion's lead. First, it includes optical image stabilization (OIS), which physically counteracts hand tremor during shooting — critical for low-light photography and smooth handheld video. The Y400 Pro offers no OIS at all, meaning it relies solely on software stabilization, which is a meaningful step down in real-world image quality. Second, the Edge 60 Fusion supports RAW capture, giving photography enthusiasts full, uncompressed image data to work with in post-processing — a feature the Y400 Pro lacks entirely. The Edge 60 Fusion also edges ahead on aperture: its main lens is f/1.8 (versus f/2.4 on the Y400 Pro's primary), and its front camera is a brighter f/2.2 versus f/2.5 on the Vivo — both of which allow more light in for cleaner shots in dim conditions.

The Edge 60 Fusion is the clear winner in this group. Its combination of a far more capable secondary camera, optical image stabilization, RAW support, and wider apertures gives it a meaningful and multi-dimensional advantage for both casual shooters and photography enthusiasts alike.

This is a rare case of a complete spec-for-spec tie. Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G run Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every data point in this group — from privacy controls and multitasking to customization and accessibility options. Neither phone gets direct OS updates, and both lack focus modes and Wi-Fi password sharing, while supporting everything from split-screen multitasking and Picture-in-Picture to dynamic theming and offline voice recognition.

Worth noting is that while the underlying Android version and feature list are the same, the actual user experience will differ in practice due to each manufacturer's custom skin — Motorola's near-stock interface versus Vivo's more heavily customized overlay. However, since those skin-level differences are not reflected in the provided specs, they fall outside the scope of this comparison.

Based strictly on the data provided, this group is an exact tie. Prospective buyers should not factor operating system specs into their decision between these two phones — every listed capability and limitation is shared equally.

Battery is one of the few categories where the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G holds a clear lead. Its 5500 mAh cell edges out the Edge 60 Fusion's 5200 mAh — a 300 mAh difference that, while not dramatic, does provide a modest but real buffer toward end-of-day longevity for heavy users. More impactful is the charging speed gap: the Y400 Pro supports 90W fast charging versus 68W on the Edge 60 Fusion. In practical terms, that 22W difference can shave a meaningful chunk of time off a full charge cycle — particularly useful for users who frequently top up in short bursts between activities.

Both phones share the same structural limitations: no wireless charging and no removable battery. So neither offers the convenience of cable-free charging or the flexibility of swapping a depleted cell — features that are increasingly rare at this segment regardless.

For this group, the Y400 Pro 5G has the advantage. It offers more capacity to get through the day and faster charging to recover when it doesn't — a combination that makes a tangible difference in real-world battery management, even if neither metric is class-leading on its own.

Audio is another category where the two phones are in complete lockstep. Both feature stereo speakers — a welcome inclusion that delivers wider soundstage for media consumption compared to mono setups — while both omit a 3.5mm headphone jack, pushing users toward wireless or USB-C wired audio. Neither device supports any high-resolution Bluetooth audio codec, including LDAC, aptX, or any of its variants, which means wireless listeners are limited to standard Bluetooth audio quality regardless of headphone quality.

This is a complete tie. Every audio-related spec in this group is identical across both phones. Buyers with strong audio priorities — particularly those invested in high-fidelity wireless headphones — should note that neither phone caters to that use case based on the available data.

The vast majority of connectivity specs here are shared: both phones offer 5G, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, dual SIM, USB Type-C, and an identical set of sensors including GPS, gyroscope, compass, and accelerometer. For everyday connectivity needs — mobile payments, wireless peripherals, location services — users of either device will have an equivalent experience.

Two differentiators break the tie, both in the Edge 60 Fusion's favor. First, it supports Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), while the Y400 Pro tops out at Wi-Fi 5. Wi-Fi 6 delivers better throughput, reduced latency, and improved performance in congested environments like offices or apartments with many connected devices — a meaningful long-term advantage as Wi-Fi 6 routers become the norm. Second, the Edge 60 Fusion includes an external memory slot, allowing storage to be expanded via a microSD card. The Y400 Pro offers no such option, meaning its 256GB of internal storage is a hard ceiling — a notable constraint given it already ships with half the built-in storage of its competitor.

The Edge 60 Fusion takes this group. The combination of a newer Wi-Fi standard and expandable storage gives it a practical, forward-looking edge in connectivity and flexibility that the Y400 Pro simply cannot match on the data provided.

With only four data points in this group, and every single one matching between the two devices, there is nothing to differentiate here. Both phones feature a curved display and a video light, while neither opts for sapphire glass or an e-paper panel. This is a complete tie, and buyers should look to other spec groups to inform their decision.