Motorola Edge 60 Fusion VS Vivo Y400 Pro 5G

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G differ in a few design aspects. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has an IP68 rating, meaning it is fully dust-tight and can withstand submersion in water up to a certain depth. In contrast, the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a lower IP65 rating, offering water resistance but not full waterproof protection.

In terms of weight, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is slightly lighter at 180.1 g compared to the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G's 182 g. When it comes to thickness, the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G is thinner at 7.7 mm, whereas the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion measures 8.25 mm. The Vivo device is also slightly taller and wider, with dimensions of 163.8 mm in height and 75 mm in width, compared to the Motorola's 161.2 mm height and 73.08 mm width.

The volume of the two devices also varies. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a larger volume of 97.19 cm³, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G's volume is smaller at 94.59 cm³. Both phones do not have a rugged build or folding capability.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep contrasts. However, they differ in several display specifications. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a slightly smaller 6.67″ screen compared to the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G's 6.77″ display. The Motorola device also boasts a higher pixel density of 446 ppi, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a lower pixel density of 388 ppi, meaning the Motorola display should appear sharper.

In terms of resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion leads with a higher 1220 x 2712 px resolution, whereas the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G offers a resolution of 1080 x 2392 px. Both devices feature a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and animations. The Motorola phone also has a higher typical brightness of 1500 nits, while the Vivo model reaches 1300 nits, making the Motorola slightly brighter in typical usage.

Additional features vary between the two. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion includes branded damage-resistant glass, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G does not. Both devices support HDR10, but only the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G supports an Always-On Display. Neither phone supports Dolby Vision or has a secondary screen.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G share several similarities in their performance specifications, with both featuring the same MediaTek Dimensity 7300 chipset, Mali G615 MC2 GPU, and 4 x 2.5 GHz & 4 x 2 GHz CPU configuration. They both also have 8 CPU threads, integrated LTE, and integrated graphics. Additionally, both devices support 64-bit processing, use big.LITTLE technology, and have a maximum memory capacity of 16GB.

Where they differ is in their memory and storage. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion offers 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G comes with 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM. Both devices use DDR5 RAM with a speed of 6400 MHz, but the Motorola has a significant advantage in terms of storage and RAM capacity.

Other specs are identical, such as the GPU clock speed of 1047 MHz, Geekbench 6 results of 2932 (multi-core) and 1026 (single-core), as well as the semiconductor size of 4 nm. Both phones also support DirectX 12 and have the same number of transistors (6200 million) and supported displays (1).

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G both feature dual-lens main cameras, though with some differences in their specifications. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a 50 MP + 13 MP main camera setup with wide apertures of f/2.2 and f/1.8, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a 50 MP + 2 MP main camera with f/2.4 and f/1.8 apertures. Both devices support 2160 x 30 fps video recording and feature phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus during video recording, and manual exposure adjustments.

For the front camera, both devices come with a 32 MP camera, though their wide apertures differ slightly. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has an f/2.2 aperture, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a slightly narrower f/2.5 aperture. Neither phone includes a front-facing LED flash. Additionally, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion supports shooting in RAW format, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G does not.

Both phones offer similar features like manual focus, timelapse functionality, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. However, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion supports built-in optical image stabilization, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G lacks this feature. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both lack a front-facing camera under the display or any 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G run on Android 15 and offer nearly identical features in terms of operating system functionality. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. They also feature theme customization, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, and the ability to play games while downloading.

Both phones support dark mode, have battery health checks, and an extra dim mode. They also offer dynamic theming, app offloading, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture). The operating systems on both devices are free and open source, and both have features like voice commands, offline voice recognition, child lock, and multi-user system support. They also track the current position of a mobile device and support widgets.

There are a few minor differences. Neither phone offers Wi-Fi password sharing or a Quick Start feature, and neither supports direct OS updates. Focus modes are not available on either device, and both phones lack the ability to be used as a PC. Both also lack Mail Privacy Protection and the ability to block cross-site tracking, with identical support for sharing intents. Both phones are similar in terms of operating system capabilities overall, with no significant differences in functionality.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G both feature non-removable rechargeable batteries, but there are some differences in their power and charging capabilities. The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a 5200 mAh battery, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a slightly larger 5500 mAh battery.

Both phones support fast charging, but the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G offers a higher charging speed of 90W compared to the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion's 68W. Neither device supports wireless charging, and both have a battery level indicator to monitor charge status.

Both devices also have rechargeable batteries, and neither has a removable battery.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G share similar audio specifications. Neither device has a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning both rely on wireless audio options or USB-C adapters for wired audio connections. Both devices are equipped with stereo speakers, offering enhanced sound quality for media playback.

Neither phone supports advanced audio codecs like aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. They also do not support LDAC for high-resolution audio streaming. Additionally, neither device has a built-in radio for FM or other types of radio reception.

Overall, the audio features of both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G are quite similar, with both focusing on stereo sound but lacking the more advanced wireless audio technology options.

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G both offer 5G support, Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 6 (with the Motorola device supporting all three versions, while the Vivo device supports only Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5). Both devices feature Bluetooth version 5.4, USB Type-C ports with USB 2.0 support, NFC, and fingerprint scanners for security.

One notable difference is that the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has an external memory slot for expandable storage, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G does not offer this feature. Both devices provide identical download and upload speeds of 3270 MBits/s. They also share similar sensor sets, including a gyroscope, GPS, compass, accelerometer, and a cellular module. Neither phone includes a barometer, infrared sensor, HDMI output, motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector.

Both phones support Galileo and do not have emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, or advanced biometric features like 3D facial recognition or an iris scanner. They also do not include a stylus. Overall, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a slight advantage in terms of memory expansion, while both devices are closely matched in other connectivity and feature specifications.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G come with a video light, which can help in low-light situations. Neither device features sapphire glass display protection, and both phones have curved displays, providing a more immersive viewing experience. Additionally, neither device includes an e-paper display, which is typically used for low-power, high-contrast displays in certain specialized applications.

Overall, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G share identical features in this category, with both offering a video light, curved displays, and lacking sapphire glass or e-paper displays.