Motorola Edge 60 Pro (256GB / 8GB RAM) VS Motorola Moto G57 Power

In terms of physical form, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is the more compact and refined device across every dimension — shorter, narrower, thinner, and with a meaningfully smaller overall volume (96.3 cm³ vs 109.3 cm³). Most tangibly, it is 24.6 g lighter than the Moto G57 Power, a difference that is noticeable during prolonged one-handed use or when the phone spends hours in a pocket. The Edge 60 Pro's 8.2 mm thickness versus the G57 Power's 8.6 mm is a smaller gap, but it contributes to an overall slimmer, more premium feel-in-hand profile.

The most significant design differentiator, however, is water protection. The Edge 60 Pro carries an IP68 rating, meaning it is fully waterproof and can withstand submersion in water — a meaningful real-world safeguard against drops in sinks, rain, or accidental spills. The Moto G57 Power is only rated IP64, which provides splash and dust resistance but offers no protection against submersion. For users who frequently use their phone outdoors or in wet environments, this is a consequential gap, not a cosmetic one.

Both phones share a non-rugged, non-foldable standard slab construction, so neither has an edge on those fronts. Overall, the Edge 60 Pro holds a clear design advantage: it is lighter, more pocketable, and significantly better protected against water ingress — three practical benefits that compound in everyday use.

The panel technology gap here is the single most important differentiator in this group. The Edge 60 Pro uses an OLED/AMOLED display, while the Moto G57 Power relies on an LCD IPS panel. In practice, OLED produces true blacks by turning off individual pixels, delivering dramatically higher contrast, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency at lower brightness levels — advantages that are immediately perceptible when watching video or using the phone in a dark room. The G57 Power's IPS panel is perfectly serviceable for everyday tasks, but it cannot match the visual depth an OLED screen provides.

Sharpness compounds this advantage further. The Edge 60 Pro's 1220 x 2712 px resolution yields a pixel density of 444 ppi, versus the G57 Power's 1080 x 2400 px at 392 ppi. That 52 ppi difference is visible at normal viewing distances — text and fine UI details appear crisper on the Edge 60 Pro. Adding to this, the Edge 60 Pro supports both HDR10 and HDR10+, meaning compatible streaming content renders with a wider dynamic range and more nuanced highlights and shadows. The G57 Power supports neither HDR standard, so it misses out on that content layer entirely.

Both phones share a 120Hz refresh rate and Gorilla Glass 7i protection — meaningful common ground that ensures smooth scrolling and equivalent scratch resistance on both. Still, the Edge 60 Pro holds an unambiguous display advantage: superior panel technology, higher pixel density, and HDR support collectively make it the stronger choice for anyone who cares about screen quality.

On paper, the Moto G57 Power appears to win one headline stat — it ships with 12GB of RAM versus the Edge 60 Pro's 8GB. For multitasking and keeping many apps suspended in the background, more RAM does help. However, raw RAM quantity tells only part of the story, and the rest of the data swings decisively in the Edge 60 Pro's favor.

The MediaTek Dimensity 8350 in the Edge 60 Pro operates with a memory bandwidth of 68.2 GB/s across 4 memory channels at 8533 MHz. The G57 Power's Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 manages just 17 GB/s across 2 memory channels at 3200 MHz. That is a fourfold bandwidth advantage for the Edge 60 Pro — meaning its processor can feed data to and from memory at a dramatically faster rate, which directly impacts real-world responsiveness in demanding tasks like gaming, image processing, and loading complex apps. The Edge 60 Pro also supports a maximum memory configuration of 24GB, double the G57 Power's ceiling of 12GB, reflecting its higher-tier platform architecture.

Both chips are built on a 4 nm process and share the same 8-thread big.LITTLE layout, DDR5 memory standard, and DirectX 12 graphics support — so the efficiency fundamentals are comparable. The G57 Power's extra RAM is a real-world benefit for heavy multitaskers, but the Edge 60 Pro's substantially more capable chipset and vastly superior memory subsystem give it a clear performance advantage overall.

The rear camera systems reveal a meaningful gap in versatility. The Edge 60 Pro fields a triple-lens setup — 50 MP + 50 MP + 10 MP — and crucially includes a dedicated 3x optical zoom lens, enabling true lossless magnification without cropping into the main sensor. The Moto G57 Power is a dual-lens system at 50 MP + 8 MP, and lists 0x optical zoom, meaning any zoom is purely digital and will degrade image quality. For users who regularly photograph subjects at a distance — people, architecture, nature — this is a practical, everyday limitation on the G57 Power.

Stabilization is the other major dividing line. The Edge 60 Pro includes optical image stabilization (OIS), which physically compensates for hand movement during capture. The G57 Power has no OIS. This matters most in low-light photography and video recording, where longer exposures amplify any shake — OIS can be the difference between a sharp shot and a blurry one. Video capability reflects the same hierarchy: the Edge 60 Pro records at 2160p (4K) at 30 fps, while the G57 Power tops out at 1440p, a step below true 4K.

Selfie performance diverges sharply as well — the Edge 60 Pro's 50 MP front camera with an f/2.0 aperture contrasts starkly with the G57 Power's 8 MP front shooter at f/2.2. Both phones otherwise share a solid common feature set: phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during video, slow-motion recording, HDR mode, and a full suite of manual controls. Still, across rear versatility, stabilization, video resolution, and selfie quality, the Edge 60 Pro holds a comprehensive and clear camera advantage.

This is one of the closest group comparisons across these two devices. The feature list is almost entirely identical — both run stock-adjacent Android with the same privacy controls, dark mode, dynamic theming, split-screen, picture-in-picture, widgets, offline voice recognition, and on-device machine learning. The vast majority of users will experience no practical software difference between them day to day.

Two points break the tie. First, the Moto G57 Power ships with Android 16, while the Edge 60 Pro launches on Android 15. A newer Android version means access to the latest platform security patches, privacy improvements, and API support from day one — a genuine advantage, even if neither phone receives direct OS updates according to the specs. Second, the Edge 60 Pro supports being used as a PC — a desktop mode feature that allows the phone to drive an external display and function more like a computer. The G57 Power lacks this capability, which matters specifically to users who want to consolidate their devices or work from a larger screen using their phone.

Weighing both: the G57 Power's newer OS version is a broader, more universally relevant advantage, while the Edge 60 Pro's PC mode is a niche but meaningful feature for a specific subset of users. On balance, the G57 Power holds a narrow software edge strictly due to its newer Android version at launch.

Battery capacity is where the Moto G57 Power makes its strongest case anywhere in this comparison. Its 7000 mAh cell outpaces the Edge 60 Pro's already-generous 6000 mAh by a full 1000 mAh — a difference large enough to translate into a meaningfully longer time between charges for typical users. The G57 Power's name signals that endurance is a core design priority, and the spec backs that up.

Charging speed, however, flips the advantage. The Edge 60 Pro supports 90W fast charging, which can replenish a large battery from near-empty to a usable level in a fraction of the time the G57 Power requires at its 30W maximum. For users who frequently need a quick top-up before heading out, that threefold wired charging speed advantage is highly practical. The Edge 60 Pro also adds wireless charging — a convenience the G57 Power entirely lacks — giving it more flexibility in how and where it can be recharged. Notably, the Edge 60 Pro also comes with a charger in the box, while the G57 Power does not, which is a real out-of-pocket consideration at purchase.

Both phones have non-removable, rechargeable batteries with no reverse wireless charging — so those traits are a wash. Ultimately, which phone wins this group depends on use case: the G57 Power suits users who want maximum battery endurance and charge less frequently, while the Edge 60 Pro suits those who prefer fast top-ups, wireless charging convenience, and are happy with a still-large 6000 mAh cell. As a pure battery category, the two phones are closely contested, but the G57 Power holds a narrow edge on raw capacity while the Edge 60 Pro compensates with a substantially more capable and flexible charging ecosystem.

Audio is a tale of two trade-offs. The Moto G57 Power retains a 3.5 mm headphone jack, which the Edge 60 Pro omits entirely. For users who own wired headphones or prefer the reliability and zero-latency connection of a physical audio port — particularly in situations where Bluetooth is impractical — this is a genuine, everyday convenience the Edge 60 Pro simply cannot offer without an adapter.

Going wireless, the Edge 60 Pro pulls ahead with support for aptX Adaptive, a high-resolution Bluetooth audio codec that dynamically adjusts bitrate to deliver lower latency and higher audio fidelity than standard Bluetooth connections. The G57 Power lacks aptX Adaptive, so users pairing it with compatible wireless headphones will receive a less optimized audio stream. For anyone invested in a quality wireless audio setup, this is a meaningful distinction. Both phones share stereo speakers, no radio, and dual microphones — so speaker and voice capture performance starts from the same baseline on paper.

This group is genuinely split by user preference. The G57 Power wins for wired audio users who value plug-and-play simplicity, while the Edge 60 Pro is the stronger choice for those committed to wireless listening who want the best available Bluetooth audio quality. Neither phone dominates outright — the advantage belongs to whichever audio lifestyle better matches the buyer.

Connectivity is broadly well-matched between these two phones, with one standout exception: Wi-Fi. The Edge 60 Pro supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), the latest generation of Wi-Fi, which operates on the 6 GHz band in addition to the conventional 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. This translates to faster maximum throughput, significantly lower latency, and less congestion in environments with many connected devices — a router upgrade away from being genuinely impactful at home or in busy offices. The Moto G57 Power, by contrast, tops out at Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), a generation behind, with no access to the 6 GHz band. For everyday browsing and streaming this gap is rarely felt, but for transferring large files wirelessly or gaming on a congested network, Wi-Fi 6E provides a real ceiling advantage.

Beyond Wi-Fi, the two phones are functionally identical across this entire group. Both support 5G, NFC, USB Type-C, a hybrid SIM tray with one physical SIM and one eSIM, GPS with Galileo, fingerprint scanning, gyroscope, compass, and accelerometer. Neither offers expandable storage, satellite SOS, crash detection, or an infrared sensor — the absences are shared equally.

With everything else at parity, the Edge 60 Pro holds a clear connectivity edge purely on the strength of its Wi-Fi 6E support. It is a future-facing advantage that grows more relevant as Wi-Fi 6E routers become more common, and it costs the G57 Power nothing else to lose — making it an unambiguous win for the Edge 60 Pro in this group.

This is a compact group with only one meaningful differentiator: the Edge 60 Pro features a curved display, while the Moto G57 Power has a flat screen. A curved panel wraps gently at the edges, giving the device a more premium, sculpted aesthetic and allowing the display to flow more seamlessly into the frame. It is primarily a design and feel distinction — some users find curved screens more comfortable to hold and visually striking, while others prefer the simplicity and easier screen-protector compatibility of a flat display. Neither approach is objectively superior, but the curved screen is generally associated with higher-tier positioning.

Both phones share a video light and lack sapphire glass or an e-paper display — none of which represent a practical advantage for either device in everyday use. The shared absences are unremarkable given the segment these phones occupy.

With only one functional differentiator in this group, the Edge 60 Pro holds a narrow aesthetic edge by virtue of its curved display, which reinforces its premium character. Whether that translates into a real advantage depends entirely on personal preference for screen curvature.