Motorola Edge 60 Pro (256GB / 8GB RAM) VS Vivo T4 Ultra 5G

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G differ in several design aspects. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is slightly lighter, weighing 186g compared to the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G’s 192g. It is also slightly thicker at 8.2mm, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G measures 7.5mm in thickness. In terms of width, the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is marginally wider at 75mm, compared to the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.1mm. Height-wise, both devices are very similar, with the Motorola Edge 60 Pro measuring 160.7mm and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G being just 0.1mm shorter at 160.6mm.

The volume of the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is 96.33 cm³, slightly larger than the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G’s 90.34 cm³, reflecting the slight differences in weight and dimensions. When it comes to water resistance, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a higher IP rating of IP68, making it fully waterproof, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a more modest IP64 rating, which indicates it is water-resistant but not fully waterproof.

Neither phone features a rugged build or the ability to fold, with both being conventional smartphone designs. Overall, while both devices share similar height and width, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a slight edge in water resistance, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is thinner and slightly more compact in volume.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The screen sizes are very similar, with the Motorola Edge 60 Pro sporting a 6.7″ display and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G coming in at 6.67″. The pixel density on the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is slightly higher, at 460 ppi, compared to the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 444 ppi, providing a slightly sharper image on the Vivo device. However, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a higher screen resolution of 1220 x 2712 px, compared to the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G's 1260 x 2800 px, which also results in a higher total number of pixels on the Vivo display.

Both phones feature a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth and responsive interactions. In terms of brightness, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro offers a significantly higher typical brightness of 4500 nits, compared to the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G's 1600 nits, making the Motorola display much brighter, especially in direct sunlight.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro includes branded damage-resistant glass, providing extra durability, whereas the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G does not have any specified damage-resistant glass. Both devices support touch screens and lack a secondary screen. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports HDR10, HDR10+, but not Dolby Vision, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G does not support HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G differ significantly in their performance specifications. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G offers 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, providing much more memory and storage capacity. In terms of benchmark performance, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro scores 1,375,600 on AnTuTu, compared to the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G's much higher score of 2,136,863. This suggests a notable difference in overall processing power between the two devices.

Both devices use MediaTek chipsets, with the Motorola Edge 60 Pro powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G running the newer Mediatek Dimensity 9300 Plus. The Motorola model has a CPU with a combination of 1 core at 3.35 GHz, 3 cores at 3.2 GHz, and 4 cores at 2.2 GHz, while the Vivo model’s CPU configuration is slightly different, with 1 core at 3.4 GHz, 3 cores at 2.85 GHz, and 4 cores at 2 GHz. Despite these differences, both devices use big.LITTLE technology and have 8 CPU threads, ensuring efficient multitasking and performance.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a GPU clock speed of 1400 MHz, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G's GPU is slightly slower at 1300 MHz. Additionally, the Motorola device offers a higher RAM speed at 8533 MHz, compared to the Vivo's 4800 MHz. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a maximum memory bandwidth of 68.2 GB/s, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G supports a higher 76.8 GB/s. The Vivo device features a larger L3 cache of 18 MB, compared to the Motorola's 4 MB. Both phones support DirectX 12, 64-bit processing, and have integrated LTE and integrated graphics. In terms of memory channels, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has 4 channels, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has 2 channels. Both phones can support up to 24GB of RAM and have DDR5 memory.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G both feature a multi-lens main camera system, with the Motorola offering a 50MP + 50MP + 10MP configuration, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a 50MP + 50MP + 8MP setup. Both devices share similar wide aperture values, with the Motorola featuring 1.8f, 2f, and 2f apertures and the Vivo using 1.9f, 2.6f, and 2.2f, allowing for slightly different light intake. Both cameras offer 3x optical zoom and can record video at 2160 x 30 fps. Additionally, both phones feature phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus for movies, and support slow-motion video recording.

For front cameras, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro comes with a 50MP sensor, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G offers a lower 32MP front camera. The Motorola has a wider aperture of 2f compared to the Vivo’s 2.5f for the front camera. Both phones lack a front-facing LED flash but do include a flash for the main camera. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both can create panoramas in-camera, but neither supports 360° panorama or 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Both devices feature a CMOS sensor, manual controls for exposure, ISO, and white balance, and the ability to shoot with manual focus. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a minimum focal length of 12mm and a maximum of 73mm, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a wider minimum focal length of 23mm and a maximum focal length of 85mm. Both models also support timelapse and serial shot modes, although neither supports a front-facing camera under the display or RGB LED flash.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G run Android 15 and offer a wide range of similar operating system features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. Neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing, and neither includes Mail Privacy Protection or blocks cross-site tracking. Both phones also support dark mode, media picker, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split-screen multitasking.

Additional shared features include on-device machine learning, notification permissions, the ability to play games while they download, and the option to offload apps. Both devices offer an extra dim mode, child lock, voice commands, offline voice recognition, and the ability to track the current position of the device. They are also both multi-user systems and include focus modes, but neither has Quick Start enabled. Dynamic theming is supported on both devices, and both have PiP (Picture in Picture) mode, as well as the ability to create and use widgets.

There are a few key differences between the two phones in terms of operating system capabilities. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro can be used as a PC, which is not a feature available on the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G. Additionally, while both devices do not receive direct OS updates, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro offers a slightly broader range of customization and system control options.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G both feature powerful batteries, though with slight differences. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is equipped with a larger 6000 mAh battery, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a 5500 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging at a speed of 90W and come with a charger in the box. However, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro offers the additional benefit of wireless charging, which the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G does not support.

Both phones have a rechargeable, non-removable battery and include a battery level indicator to help monitor power. Neither device has a removable battery, and both support fast charging at the same 90W rate, ensuring rapid power replenishment when needed. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro stands out with its wireless charging capability, a feature not available on the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G.

In summary, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro offers a larger battery and wireless charging, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G features a slightly smaller battery and lacks wireless charging support.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so neither offers wired audio connectivity. Both phones are equipped with stereo speakers, ensuring a high-quality audio experience through their built-in sound systems. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports aptX Adaptive, which enhances audio quality and performance, especially for Bluetooth audio devices. However, the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G does not support aptX Adaptive, which may result in a difference in wireless audio quality for users with compatible Bluetooth headphones.

Neither device includes a radio, so users will not be able to listen to FM or other radio stations without relying on streaming services or apps. Overall, the key distinction between the two phones in the audio category is the inclusion of aptX Adaptive on the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G lacks this feature.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G both offer 5G support, ensuring fast cellular connectivity. They both have USB Type-C ports with USB version 2 and feature NFC for easy pairing with other devices. Both devices also include a fingerprint scanner for secure access, as well as GPS and a compass for navigation. Additionally, both phones support Wi-Fi connectivity, though the Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), giving the Motorola a potential advantage in terms of newer Wi-Fi technology.

Both devices have no external memory slot, meaning users cannot expand storage via SD cards. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro uses 1 SIM and 1 eSIM, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G allows for 2 SIM cards, offering more flexibility for users who need multiple phone numbers or networks. Neither phone features an infrared sensor, barometer, HDMI output, or a built-in projector, and both lack motion and optical tracking features. Neither device includes 3D facial recognition or an iris scanner.

Both phones come with a similar set of sensors, including a gyroscope, accelerometer, and cellular module. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro also supports Galileo satellite navigation, which is a feature that is also supported by the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G. However, neither phone supports ANT+ or includes a heart rate monitor. Additionally, both devices lack features like emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, and stylus support.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G include a video light, making it easier to capture photos or videos in low-light environments. Neither device features sapphire glass for additional display protection, so users may want to consider other screen protection options. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a curved display, offering a more immersive viewing experience, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a flat display, which may appeal to those who prefer a traditional screen design. Neither phone includes an e-paper display, so both devices rely on standard display technologies for screen performance.

In summary, both phones share some key features, such as the video light and the lack of sapphire glass or e-paper displays. However, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro sets itself apart with its curved display, which is absent on the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G.