Motorola Edge 60 Pro VS Motorola Moto G100 Pro

Both phones share the same foundational design credentials: an IP68 waterproof rating, no rugged build, and a conventional candy-bar form factor. The IP68 certification means both can withstand submersion in fresh water, offering meaningful everyday protection against rain, splashes, or accidental drops in water — a genuinely useful feature at this tier.

Where the two diverge is in their physical footprint. The Edge 60 Pro is measurably more compact across every dimension — lighter at 186 g versus 198 g, thinner at 8.2 mm versus 8.65 mm, and narrower at 73.1 mm versus 74.4 mm. The cumulative effect is a noticeably smaller volume: 96.33 cm³ compared to 103.74 cm³ for the G100 Pro — roughly a 7.7% difference. A 12-gram weight gap may sound minor on paper, but over a full day of use it translates to a perceptibly lighter feel in hand and pocket.

The Edge 60 Pro holds a clear advantage in design ergonomics. It is the slimmer, lighter, and more pocketable of the two without sacrificing water resistance. Users who prioritize one-handed comfort or dislike bulky phones will find it the more refined option. The G100 Pro's larger volume may hint at accommodations for other internal components, but purely on design and handling, the Edge 60 Pro wins this category.

On paper, these two displays look nearly identical — both are OLED/AMOLED panels running at 120Hz, sharing the same 1220 x 2712 resolution, virtually the same pixel density (444 vs 446 ppi), and the same Gorilla Glass 7i protection. At that sharpness level, neither the human eye nor any practical use case will reveal a difference. HDR10 and HDR10+ support is also matched across both phones, meaning streaming platforms will deliver the same tone-mapped content on either screen.

The single — but highly consequential — differentiator is peak brightness. The Edge 60 Pro hits an extraordinary 4500 nits, compared to just 1000 nits on the G100 Pro. This is not a marginal gap; it is a 4.5× difference. In real-world terms, 1000 nits is perfectly adequate for indoor use and reasonably comfortable outdoors, but direct sunlight will make content harder to read. At 4500 nits, the Edge 60 Pro remains clearly legible even under harsh midday sun — a meaningful advantage for users who frequently use their phone outside.

The Edge 60 Pro wins this category decisively, and it is not close. The screens are functionally equivalent in sharpness, smoothness, and durability, but the Edge 60 Pro's brightness advantage translates directly to better outdoor usability — one of the most practical, everyday display attributes a smartphone can have.

The chipset gap here is substantial. The Edge 60 Pro runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, a premium mid-range SoC, while the G100 Pro relies on the more modest Dimensity 7300. The Geekbench 6 scores make the performance delta concrete: the Edge 60 Pro posts 4700 multi-core and 1536 single-core, versus 2932 multi-core and 1026 single-core for the G100 Pro. That is roughly a 60% lead in multi-core throughput — meaningful not just for benchmarks, but for real tasks like video editing, multitasking under load, and sustained gaming performance.

The GPU story follows the same pattern. Both phones use a Mali G615 variant, but the Edge 60 Pro's MC6 configuration (six cores) at 1400 MHz far outpaces the G100 Pro's MC2 (two cores) running at 1047 MHz. For gaming and GPU-intensive workloads, this is a significant structural advantage, not just a clock speed difference. Additionally, the Edge 60 Pro's RAM operates at 8533 MHz versus 6400 MHz, which helps feed the faster CPU with data more efficiently, and its maximum supported memory of 24GB versus 16GB gives it more headroom for future configurations.

The Edge 60 Pro wins this category comprehensively. Every measurable performance dimension — CPU speed, GPU horsepower, RAM bandwidth, and peak memory ceiling — favors it. Both phones share the same storage capacity and fabrication node, but those commonalities mask a wide performance tier gap. Users who care about demanding apps, gaming, or long-term performance headroom should view the Edge 60 Pro as the clear choice here.

The rear camera systems reveal a meaningful structural difference between these two phones. The Edge 60 Pro fields a triple-camera setup (50 + 50 + 10 MP), while the G100 Pro makes do with a dual-camera system (50 + 8 MP). More telling than the sensor count is what those extra cameras enable: the Edge 60 Pro offers 3x optical zoom — true optical magnification with no image quality loss — while the G100 Pro has no optical zoom at all. For anyone who regularly photographs subjects at a distance, this is a practical, everyday limitation on the G100 Pro.

Two further advantages compound the Edge 60 Pro's lead. Its main lens opens to f/1.8 versus the G100 Pro's f/2.2, meaning it admits more light in low-light conditions — a wider aperture consistently translates to brighter, less noisy night shots. Critically, the Edge 60 Pro also includes optical image stabilization (OIS), which the G100 Pro lacks entirely. OIS reduces camera shake during handheld shots and video recording, and its absence on the G100 Pro will be felt particularly in dim environments or when shooting while moving. On the front, the Edge 60 Pro's 50MP selfie camera with an f/2 aperture also outresolves the G100 Pro's 32MP f/2.2 sensor.

The Edge 60 Pro wins this category across the board. Greater versatility via a third lens, genuine optical zoom, a brighter main aperture, OIS, and a higher-resolution front camera collectively amount to a significantly more capable imaging system. Shared features like 4K/30fps video, phase-detection autofocus, and slow-motion recording keep the G100 Pro functional, but the gap in hardware is too wide to overlook.

For the vast majority of the OS feature set, these two phones are carbon copies of each other. Both launch on Android 15 and share an identical suite of privacy controls, productivity tools, and user experience features — from dynamic theming and split-screen multitasking to offline voice recognition and on-device machine learning. Neither receives direct OS updates, and both are equally matched on customization depth and accessibility options.

Scanning the full spec list, exactly one differentiator emerges: the Edge 60 Pro can be used as a PC, while the G100 Pro cannot. This capability — typically realized by connecting the phone to an external display, keyboard, and mouse to run a desktop-like interface — is a genuine productivity differentiator for users who want to consolidate their computing into a single device. It is a niche use case, but a valuable one for power users or frequent travelers.

Outside of that single distinction, this category is essentially a tie. The Edge 60 Pro takes a narrow win on the strength of its PC mode capability, but users who have no interest in that feature will find the software experience of both phones functionally indistinguishable.

This category presents a genuine trade-off rather than a clear winner in one direction. The G100 Pro packs a larger 6720 mAh battery versus the Edge 60 Pro's 6000 mAh — a 12% capacity advantage that, all else being equal, translates to meaningfully longer time between charges. For users who prioritize endurance above all else, that extra headroom is real and tangible across a full day of heavy use.

The Edge 60 Pro counters, however, with a significantly faster charging speed of 90W compared to the G100 Pro's 30W. At 90W, topping up from low to full can take as little as 30–40 minutes; at 30W, the same task takes considerably longer. The Edge 60 Pro also supports wireless charging, a convenience feature the G100 Pro lacks entirely — allowing cable-free top-ups on compatible pads throughout the day, which can partially offset its smaller raw capacity.

The verdict here depends entirely on usage habits. The G100 Pro is the better fit for users who rarely charge during the day and want maximum uptime. The Edge 60 Pro suits those who charge opportunistically and value speed and wireless convenience over raw capacity. Neither phone has a removable battery, so both are equally matched on that front. Overall, the Edge 60 Pro's charging ecosystem is more flexible, but the G100 Pro's capacity lead is the more straightforward endurance advantage.

Both phones drop the 3.5mm headphone jack and offer stereo speakers, so wired analog audio and speaker output are evenly matched. Where they diverge is in wireless audio quality and broadcast radio. The Edge 60 Pro supports aptX Adaptive, a high-resolution Bluetooth audio codec that dynamically adjusts bitrate for lower latency and higher fidelity over compatible wireless headphones. For users who invest in quality Bluetooth audio gear, this is a tangible upgrade over standard codecs — delivering closer-to-lossless sound with reduced lag.

The G100 Pro, in turn, includes a built-in FM radio — a feature the Edge 60 Pro omits entirely. This is increasingly rare on modern smartphones and caters to a specific audience: users in regions with strong FM broadcast infrastructure, or those who want offline, data-free audio access during commutes or emergencies.

These two features serve entirely different listener profiles, making this category a genuine split. The Edge 60 Pro is the stronger choice for wireless headphone enthusiasts who want the best Bluetooth audio experience. The G100 Pro appeals to those who value FM radio access. Neither holds a universal advantage — the winner depends squarely on how the user consumes audio.

Across the broad connectivity landscape — 5G, NFC, USB Type-C, GPS, Galileo, fingerprint scanner, gyroscope — these two phones are functionally identical. Both support eSIM alongside a physical SIM slot, skip expandable storage, and share the same USB 2.0 implementation. For the vast majority of everyday connectivity needs, users would experience no difference between them.

The one meaningful differentiator is Wi-Fi. The Edge 60 Pro supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), which adds access to the 6 GHz frequency band on top of the standard 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands that Wi-Fi 6 uses. In congested environments — dense apartment buildings, offices, or public spaces — the 6 GHz band is far less crowded, delivering lower latency and more consistent throughput when a compatible router is present. The G100 Pro tops out at Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), which is still a capable standard but lacks access to that uncongested 6 GHz band entirely.

The Edge 60 Pro takes a narrow but real win here on the strength of Wi-Fi 6E. It is a future-facing advantage that will become more relevant as 6 GHz routers grow in adoption. That said, for users without a Wi-Fi 6E router at home, the practical difference today is negligible. In all other connectivity respects, these phones are evenly matched.

This is a short spec group with limited data points, and most of them are shared: both phones include a video light and neither features sapphire glass or an e-paper display. The single distinguishing factor is display geometry — the Edge 60 Pro has a curved display, while the G100 Pro uses a flat panel.

A curved screen is primarily an aesthetic and ergonomic choice. The edges of the display wrap gently toward the frame, giving the phone a more premium, sculpted look and making swiping in from the sides feel smoother in hand. The trade-off is practical: curved displays can be more prone to accidental edge touches and are generally harder to protect with screen protectors. Flat displays, by contrast, are easier to case and more forgiving in day-to-day handling. Neither approach is objectively superior — it comes down to personal preference and how much the user prioritizes looks versus practicality.

The Edge 60 Pro takes a marginal win here for users who value a more refined, premium aesthetic. For those who prioritize durability and ease of screen protection, the G100 Pro's flat display is the more practical choice. Given how narrow the spec set is in this category, neither phone holds a compelling overall advantage.