Motorola Edge 60 Pro VS Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE share the same IP68 waterproof rating, meaning both can withstand submersion in fresh water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. Neither offers a rugged build or a foldable form factor, so on those fronts they are evenly matched.

Where the two diverge meaningfully is in their physical footprint. The S25 FE is notably slimmer at 7.4 mm versus 8.2 mm for the Edge 60 Pro — a 0.8 mm difference that is genuinely perceptible in-hand and in a pocket. However, the S25 FE is also wider at 76.6 mm compared to the Edge 60 Pro's 73.1 mm, which can make one-handed use more of a stretch for users with smaller hands. Interestingly, despite being wider and taller, the S25 FE has a smaller overall volume (91.4 cm³ vs 96.3 cm³), a direct result of its thinner profile. The Edge 60 Pro is slightly lighter at 186 g versus 190 g, though a 4-gram difference is unlikely to be noticed during normal use.

In terms of design, the S25 FE holds a clear edge in thinness, which generally translates to a more premium, sleek feel. The Edge 60 Pro counters with a narrower width that may suit one-handed users better. If slim profile is a priority, the S25 FE wins; if a narrower grip is preferred, the Edge 60 Pro is the better fit.

Both phones sport a 6.7″ OLED/AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+ support, and branded glass protection — a solid shared foundation. The similarities, however, end there. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro pulls significantly ahead in two critical areas: resolution and brightness. Its 1220 x 2712 px screen yields a pixel density of 444 ppi, compared to the S25 FE's 1080 x 2340 px at 385 ppi. That 59 ppi gap is clearly visible — text appears crisper, fine UI details are sharper, and media looks noticeably more refined on the Edge 60 Pro.

The brightness difference is even more striking. The Edge 60 Pro's 4500 nits peak brightness dwarfs the S25 FE's 1200 nits. In practice, this means the Edge 60 Pro remains easily legible in direct sunlight — a scenario where the S25 FE will visibly struggle. For users who frequently use their phone outdoors, this is one of the most impactful real-world differentiators possible.

On glass protection, the S25 FE uses Gorilla Glass Victus, which is generally considered a more premium and scratch-resistant option than the Edge 60 Pro's Gorilla Glass 7i — though both offer meaningful drop and scratch protection. Still, that advantage is minor relative to the Edge 60 Pro's commanding leads in sharpness and brightness. Overall, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a clear and decisive advantage in display quality within this spec group.

The chipset battle here is genuinely split, depending on what you value. The Samsung Exynos 2400 in the S25 FE dominates raw CPU benchmarks by a wide margin — its Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 7000 versus 4700 for the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's MediaTek Dimensity 8350 is a 49% lead, and the single-core gap (2198 vs 1536) is equally commanding. The AnTuTu score tells the same story: 2,147,521 versus 1,375,600. In practice, the S25 FE will handle demanding tasks — complex app switching, heavy processing, sustained workloads — with noticeably more headroom.

The Edge 60 Pro fights back on memory. It ships with 12GB of RAM running at a blistering 8533 MHz, compared to the S25 FE's 8GB at 4200 MHz. More RAM and faster memory bandwidth means the Edge 60 Pro can keep more apps resident in memory simultaneously and feed data to the CPU quicker — useful for heavy multitaskers. It also doubles down on storage, offering 512GB versus the S25 FE's 256GB, which is a meaningful advantage for users who store large media libraries or games locally.

Taken together, the S25 FE holds a clear advantage in outright processing power, which matters most for gaming, video rendering, and future-proofing. The Edge 60 Pro's superior RAM configuration makes it a stronger multitasking device and better value on storage. Users who prioritize peak performance should lean toward the S25 FE; those who want a more capable memory setup and greater onboard storage will find the Edge 60 Pro more compelling.

The main cameras open on equal footing — both lead with a 50MP f/1.8 primary sensor with OIS and 3x optical zoom — but the supporting cast diverges sharply. The Edge 60 Pro's secondary lenses are significantly higher resolution (50MP + 10MP) versus the S25 FE's 12MP + 8MP, meaning the Motorola captures considerably more detail from its ultrawide and telephoto shots. Where the S25 FE counters is in sensor technology: it includes a BSI (Back-Side Illuminated) sensor, which is designed to improve light gathering and low-light performance — an advantage the raw megapixel count alone doesn't reflect.

Video recording is another meaningful split. The S25 FE tops out at 4320p (8K) at 30fps, a full tier above the Edge 60 Pro's 2160p (4K) ceiling — useful for those who want maximum video resolution for cropping or future-proofing footage. The S25 FE also adds laser autofocus and manual shutter speed control, giving it more precise focusing in low-contrast scenes and greater manual control for photography enthusiasts. Its dual-tone LED flash produces more natural-looking skin tones in flash photography compared to the Edge 60 Pro's single-tone flash.

The Edge 60 Pro's standout camera advantage is its 50MP front camera, which vastly outresolves the S25 FE's 12MP selfie shooter — a decisive edge for selfie-focused users. On balance, however, the S25 FE offers a more well-rounded and feature-complete camera system overall, with higher video resolution, better low-light sensor design, laser AF, and more manual controls. The S25 FE holds the broader camera advantage, while the Edge 60 Pro leads specifically in selfie resolution.

Across the entire operating system spec sheet, these two phones are virtually identical — every single feature flag matches, from privacy controls and dynamic theming to split-screen, Picture-in-Picture, and offline voice recognition. The only differentiator in this entire group is the Android version: the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE ships with Android 16, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro launches on Android 15.

That one-generation gap does carry some practical weight. Android 16 brings incremental improvements in security, privacy, and system-level optimizations over Android 15 — meaning the S25 FE starts its lifecycle one step ahead in terms of OS maturity. More importantly, being on a newer version means the S25 FE will likely reach the end of its supported update window one cycle later than the Edge 60 Pro, all else being equal.

Given that every other software feature is matched spec-for-spec, the S25 FE holds a narrow but real advantage here solely by virtue of launching on a more current Android version. It is not a decisive gap, but for users who care about longevity and staying current with platform updates, it is the only meaningful differentiator this group provides.

Battery capacity is where the Motorola Edge 60 Pro makes one of its strongest statements in this entire comparison. Its 6000 mAh cell outpaces the S25 FE's 4900 mAh by a substantial 1100 mAh — a 22% larger reserve that translates directly into longer time between charges. For heavy users, that gap can realistically mean the difference between reaching the end of a full day and needing a top-up by evening. The Edge 60 Pro also wired charging speeds are considerably faster at 90W versus the S25 FE's 45W, meaning that when it does need a charge, it refills in roughly half the time.

The S25 FE counters with a meaningful advantage of its own: 25W wireless charging versus the Edge 60 Pro's 15W, making it the faster option for users who rely on wireless pads at home or at work. It also supports reverse wireless charging, which the Edge 60 Pro lacks entirely — a handy feature for topping up wireless earbuds or a smartwatch directly from the phone. Notably, the S25 FE does not include a charger in the box, whereas the Edge 60 Pro does, which is a practical out-of-box consideration.

On balance, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro holds a clear battery advantage for most users — its larger capacity and dramatically faster wired charging are higher-impact benefits for day-to-day use. The S25 FE's faster wireless charging and reverse wireless capability are genuine perks, but they serve a more specific use case and don't offset the Edge 60 Pro's lead in raw endurance and wired charging speed.

Shared ground is extensive here: neither phone has a 3.5mm headphone jack or a radio, and both feature stereo speakers — a baseline that ensures a reasonably immersive media experience without wired headphones. The two key differentiators are wireless audio codec support and microphone count.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports aptX Adaptive, which the S25 FE lacks. This Qualcomm-developed codec delivers higher-resolution wireless audio with lower latency over Bluetooth compared to standard codecs — a tangible benefit for users with compatible aptX Adaptive headphones who care about audio fidelity or use their phone for gaming with wireless audio. The S25 FE, without this codec, will fall back to less capable alternatives when paired with the same headphones.

Conversely, the S25 FE edges ahead for voice capture with 3 microphones versus the Edge 60 Pro's 2. The additional microphone improves noise cancellation, spatial audio capture, and call clarity — particularly in noisy environments. This is a meaningful advantage for frequent callers and video creators. Overall, this group is a genuine trade-off: the Edge 60 Pro wins for wireless audio quality, while the S25 FE wins for voice and microphone performance, leaving no single clear overall victor.

For the most part, these two phones are remarkably well-matched on connectivity: both support 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, NFC, USB Type-C, a fingerprint scanner, GPS with Galileo, and a 1 SIM + 1 eSIM configuration. Neither offers expandable storage, an infrared sensor, satellite SOS, or crash detection. For the majority of users, day-to-day connectivity will feel identical on both devices.

Two specs separate them. The S25 FE includes a barometer, which the Edge 60 Pro lacks — a sensor useful for altitude tracking, weather trend detection, and more accurate GPS elevation data, making it a meaningful addition for outdoor and fitness-oriented users. The Edge 60 Pro, meanwhile, lists Wi-Fi 6E as its sole Wi-Fi standard, while the S25 FE explicitly supports the full backward-compatible stack — Wi-Fi 4, 5, 6, and 6E. In practice both phones will connect to the same networks, but the S25 FE's explicit multi-standard listing suggests broader certified compatibility across legacy and modern routers alike.

Neither difference is a dealbreaker, but taken together they give the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE a slight edge in this category — the barometer is a genuinely useful real-world addition, and its broader documented Wi-Fi compatibility adds a layer of reassurance for users across varied network environments.

This spec group is lean, with both phones sharing every attribute except one: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a curved display, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE uses a flat panel. Both have a video light and neither uses sapphire glass or an e-paper display — those shared points require no further analysis.

The curved screen on the Edge 60 Pro is a purely aesthetic and ergonomic distinction. Curved edges can give a phone a more premium, sleek visual identity and may feel more natural where the screen meets the palm during extended use. The trade-off is that curved displays are generally more prone to accidental edge touches and can make screen protector application more difficult. The S25 FE's flat panel, by contrast, is more practical for case compatibility and everyday durability, and many users actively prefer it for those reasons.

There is no objectively superior choice here — it comes down entirely to personal preference. Users who prize a premium, sculpted aesthetic will appreciate the Edge 60 Pro's curved display, while those who prioritize practicality and ease of screen protection will favor the S25 FE's flat design. This group is effectively a tie in functional terms, with the differentiator being a matter of taste rather than capability.