Motorola Edge 60 Pro VS Vivo iQOO Neo 10

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 both have waterproof designs, with the Motorola featuring an IP68 rating and the Vivo offering an IP65 rating. This means the Motorola has better protection against dust and can handle submersion in water at greater depths and durations compared to the Vivo's more basic water resistance.

In terms of physical dimensions, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is slightly lighter, weighing 186 g, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 is a bit heavier at 206 g. The Motorola is also narrower at 73.1 mm, compared to the Vivo’s 75.9 mm width. The Vivo, however, is slightly taller (163.7 mm) than the Motorola (160.7 mm). Additionally, the Motorola has a slightly thicker profile at 8.2 mm, while the Vivo is just 8.1 mm thick.

The two phones also differ in their volume, with the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 having a larger volume of 100.64 cm³ compared to the Motorola's 96.33 cm³, indicating a slightly more spacious build for the Vivo.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The Motorola has a 6.7″ screen size, while the Vivo's display is slightly larger at 6.78″.

In terms of resolution, the Motorola offers 1220 x 2712 px, while the Vivo has a slightly higher resolution of 1260 x 2800 px, which contributes to a slightly sharper image on the Vivo. The Motorola has a pixel density of 444 ppi, while the Vivo's pixel density is slightly higher at 453 ppi, indicating the Vivo may display slightly more detailed visuals.

Both devices support HDR10 and HDR10+, but the Motorola Edge 60 Pro includes branded damage-resistant glass, which the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 lacks. The Motorola also has a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo supports a faster 144Hz refresh rate, resulting in smoother on-screen motion for the Vivo. Neither device supports Dolby Vision, and neither has a secondary screen. Both also feature a touchscreen.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 come with 512GB of internal storage, but they differ in RAM size. The Motorola has 12GB of RAM, while the Vivo offers 16GB, providing the Vivo with more memory for multitasking.

In terms of performance benchmarks, the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 outperforms the Motorola in both AnTuTu and Geekbench scores. The Vivo achieves an impressive AnTuTu score of 2,135,100, compared to the Motorola's 1,375,600. Similarly, the Vivo scores 6,833 in Geekbench 6 (multi-core), and 2,041 (single-core), whereas the Motorola scores 4,700 (multi-core) and 1,536 (single-core).

The two phones are powered by different chipsets, with the Motorola using the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 and the Vivo using the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Both chipsets are built on a 4nm process and use big.LITTLE technology with 8 CPU threads. The Motorola’s CPU features speeds of 3.35 GHz (1 core), 3.2 GHz (3 cores), and 2.2 GHz (4 cores), while the Vivo’s CPU is slightly faster with 3.21 GHz (1 core), 3.01 GHz (3 cores), 2.8 GHz (2 cores), and 2.02 GHz (2 cores). The GPU clock speed is also different, with the Motorola's Mali G615 MC6 running at 1,400 MHz, while the Vivo's Adreno 825 runs at 1,150 MHz.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 both feature multi-lens main cameras, but with different configurations. The Motorola has a 50MP + 50MP + 10MP setup, while the Vivo offers a 50MP + 8MP configuration. The Motorola also supports optical zoom at 3x, while the Vivo does not support optical zoom, offering 0x zoom.

For front-facing cameras, the Motorola boasts a 50MP camera with a wide aperture of f/2, while the Vivo has a 32MP front camera with a wider aperture of f/2.5. Both devices offer features like phase-detection autofocus, manual exposure, and slow-motion video recording. The video recording capabilities of the main camera are different, with the Motorola recording video at 2160 x 30 fps, while the Vivo records at 2160 x 60 fps, offering smoother video capture.

Both phones lack a dual-tone LED flash, and neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. They share other features such as continuous autofocus during video recording, CMOS sensors, manual white balance, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. Both also support timelapse and serial shot modes, but neither has laser autofocus, a front-facing LED flash, or the ability to shoot 360° panoramas.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 run Android 15 and share several common features. Both phones include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. They also support dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health check, dynamic theming, customizable notifications, and features like Live Text and full-page screenshots.

However, there are a few differences between the two devices. The Motorola has the additional ability to be used as a PC, while the Vivo does not support this feature. Both phones lack direct OS updates, but they provide offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the tracking of the current device position. They also support widgets, multi-user systems, and child locks.

Some features are unique to the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, including PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode, focus modes, and the extra dim mode, which the Vivo lacks. On the other hand, both phones share other capabilities like the ability to offload apps, use sharing intents, and the absence of Mail Privacy Protection, cross-site tracking blocking, and Quick Start.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 differ in battery size and charging features. The Motorola is equipped with a 6000 mAh battery, while the Vivo has a larger 7000 mAh battery, offering more capacity for extended use.

Both phones support fast charging, but the Vivo offers a faster charging speed of 120W compared to the Motorola’s 90W. However, the Motorola supports wireless charging, while the Vivo does not. Both devices come with a charger included and feature a rechargeable, non-removable battery, along with a battery level indicator.

Neither phone has a removable battery, and both have a rechargeable battery. Additionally, the battery features of both models are quite similar, with both devices offering essential battery management capabilities, such as a battery level indicator and a rechargeable design.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, making them reliant on wireless or USB audio solutions. Both phones are equipped with stereo speakers, ensuring high-quality sound output. However, the Motorola supports aptX Adaptive, a feature that enhances audio quality over Bluetooth, while the Vivo does not have support for aptX Adaptive.

Neither device has a built-in radio, so users looking for FM radio functionality will not find it on either phone.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 support 5G and feature USB Type-C ports with USB version 2. They also include NFC, fingerprint scanners, GPS, and a compass. Both phones have a gyroscope, accelerometer, and a cellular module for connectivity. However, the Vivo offers dual SIM card support with two physical SIMs, while the Motorola has a single physical SIM and one eSIM.

When it comes to Wi-Fi, the Motorola supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), while the Vivo supports a broader range of Wi-Fi standards, including Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), making the Vivo potentially more versatile for future Wi-Fi technologies.

The Vivo iQOO Neo 10 stands out by including an infrared sensor, which the Motorola lacks. Both devices have similar features, such as the absence of a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, motion tracking, optical tracking, and a built-in projector. Neither phone supports ANT+, has a heart rate monitor, or offers satellite emergency SOS or crash detection.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 10 come with a video light, making them suitable for better lighting during video capture. However, there are differences in their display designs. The Motorola features a curved display, providing a more immersive viewing experience, while the Vivo opts for a standard flat display without the curvature.

Neither device offers sapphire glass protection for the display, nor do they feature an e-paper display, meaning they both use traditional display technology.