Motorola Edge 60 Pro VS Vivo Y400 Pro 5G

The most consequential difference in this group is water protection. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro carries an IP68 rating, meaning it is fully waterproof and can withstand sustained submersion — typically up to 1.5 metres for 30 minutes. The Vivo Y400 Pro 5G, rated at IP65, is only water resistant against low-pressure jets and splashes, but offers no protection against immersion. For users who swim, work near water, or simply want peace of mind in rain or accidental drops in liquid, this is a meaningful real-world gap.

On physical form, the two phones trade blows in minor ways. The Y400 Pro is marginally lighter at 182 g versus 186 g, and notably slimmer at 7.7 mm compared to 8.2 mm, making it the more pocket-friendly option for users who prioritise a sleek profile. The Edge 60 Pro is slightly more compact in footprint (shorter and narrower), though the difference in hand feel will be negligible for most users.

Overall, the Edge 60 Pro has a clear design advantage in this group. The IP68 certification is a substantially superior protection standard that the IP65-rated Y400 Pro simply cannot match. The Y400 Pro's slimmer chassis is a genuine but secondary perk — useful for aesthetics and pocket comfort, but not a meaningful counterweight to the waterproofing gap.

Both phones use OLED/AMOLED panels with a 120Hz refresh rate, so the baseline display experience — deep blacks, vibrant colours, and smooth scrolling — is shared. The screens are also nearly identical in size at 6.7″ and 6.77″ respectively, so neither product offers a meaningfully larger canvas.

Where they diverge sharply is in brightness and sharpness. The Edge 60 Pro hits a staggering 4500 nits of peak brightness versus just 1300 nits on the Y400 Pro — a gap that is enormous in practice. In direct sunlight, the Edge 60 Pro will remain clearly legible while the Y400 Pro is likely to struggle. The resolution difference compounds this: at 444 ppi versus 388 ppi, the Edge 60 Pro renders noticeably crisper text and fine detail, particularly at typical viewing distances. The Edge 60 Pro also supports HDR10+ — the dynamic metadata variant that adapts tone-mapping scene by scene — while the Y400 Pro tops out at the static HDR10 standard. Add branded damage-resistant glass on the Edge 60 Pro (absent on the Y400 Pro), and the hardware quality gap widens further.

The Edge 60 Pro wins this category decisively. The brightness advantage alone is a significant practical differentiator for outdoor use, and the higher pixel density, HDR10+ support, and screen protection collectively make it the superior display package by a considerable margin.

Both phones are built on a 4nm MediaTek process, but the similarity ends at the manufacturing node. The Edge 60 Pro runs on the Dimensity 8350, a chipset that sits in an entirely different performance tier than the Dimensity 7300 inside the Y400 Pro. The Geekbench 6 multi-core scores tell the story plainly: 4700 versus 2932 — the Edge 60 Pro delivers roughly 60% more sustained CPU throughput, which translates to noticeably faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and more headroom for demanding workloads.

The GPU gap is equally pronounced. The Edge 60 Pro's Mali G615 MC6 runs at 1400 MHz with six cores, while the Y400 Pro uses a cut-down MC2 variant clocked at 1047 MHz — less than a third of the graphics cores at a lower clock speed. For gaming or any GPU-intensive task, this is a significant practical difference. Memory bandwidth reinforces the advantage further: the Edge 60 Pro's RAM operates at 8533 MHz versus 6400 MHz, meaning data moves to and from the processor faster, reducing bottlenecks under load. Paired with 12GB of RAM (expandable to 24GB) and 512GB of storage, the Edge 60 Pro also simply offers more headroom for large app libraries and heavy multitasking than the Y400 Pro's 8GB / 256GB configuration.

The Edge 60 Pro wins this category comprehensively. Across CPU throughput, GPU capability, memory speed, and raw storage capacity, it outclasses the Y400 Pro at every measurable point. The Y400 Pro is adequate for everyday tasks, but users who game, edit media, or push their phone hard will find the performance gap impossible to ignore.

The rear camera systems are not in the same class. The Edge 60 Pro fields a genuine triple-lens array — a 50MP primary, a 50MP ultrawide, and a 10MP telephoto — giving users three distinct focal lengths to work with. The Y400 Pro, by contrast, pairs its 50MP main sensor with a 2MP secondary that functions purely as a depth aid for portrait shots, offering no additional compositional versatility whatsoever. This is a fundamental difference in how each phone handles varied shooting scenarios.

Two further gaps compound the Edge 60 Pro's advantage. First, it includes optical image stabilization (OIS), which physically counteracts hand movement during shooting — critical for sharp handheld photos in low light and stable video footage. The Y400 Pro has no OIS, leaving it reliant on software compensation alone. Second, the Edge 60 Pro offers 3x optical zoom through its dedicated telephoto lens, while the Y400 Pro has no optical zoom at all, meaning any zoom it produces degrades image quality by cropping digitally. On the front, the Edge 60 Pro's 50MP selfie sensor with an f/2.0 aperture also outresolves the Y400 Pro's 32MP f/2.5 unit, capturing more detail and performing better in dimmer conditions. Both phones top out at 4K 30fps video, so maximum recording resolution is a tie.

The Edge 60 Pro wins this category clearly. A triple-camera system with OIS and genuine optical zoom versus a single-lens setup with a token depth sensor is not a close contest — it represents a meaningfully broader and more capable imaging toolkit for anyone who shoots beyond simple point-and-click scenarios.

This is one of the closest matchups in the comparison so far. Both phones run Android 15 and share an essentially identical feature set across privacy controls, productivity tools, and UI customization — including dynamic theming, split-screen multitasking, picture-in-picture, on-device machine learning, and offline voice recognition. Users switching between the two would find the software experience largely indistinguishable in day-to-day use.

Scanning the full spec list, the only functional difference is that the Edge 60 Pro supports desktop mode (PC use), while the Y400 Pro does not. This feature allows the Edge 60 Pro to be connected to an external display and used as a basic desktop computing environment — useful for users who want to consolidate their devices or work on the go without a laptop.

The Edge 60 Pro holds a narrow edge in this category purely due to desktop mode support, which the Y400 Pro lacks. That said, this is a minor practical differentiator for most users — the vast majority will never use it. For everyone else, the two phones are essentially tied on software, delivering the same Android 15 foundation with the same privacy, customization, and productivity capabilities.

Wired charging is a dead heat: both phones support fast charging at an identical 90W, meaning neither has an advantage in how quickly it can be topped up from a cable. The capacity gap, however, favours the Edge 60 Pro — its 6000 mAh battery holds roughly 9% more charge than the Y400 Pro's 5500 mAh cell. That difference is meaningful in practice, likely translating to an additional hour or more of screen-on time per charge cycle, depending on usage patterns.

The more consequential differentiator is wireless charging. The Edge 60 Pro supports it; the Y400 Pro does not. Wireless charging adds a layer of everyday convenience — dropping the phone on a pad at a desk or bedside without fumbling for a cable — and its complete absence on the Y400 Pro is a genuine omission at this tier.

The Edge 60 Pro wins this category on both counts: a larger battery for longer endurance and wireless charging for added convenience. The Y400 Pro matches it on wired charging speed, but that shared strength isn't enough to offset the capacity and charging flexibility gap.

The audio spec sheet is thin for both phones, and most of it is shared. Neither device includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, so wired listening requires an adapter or Bluetooth headphones on both. Both also feature stereo speakers, ensuring a reasonably spacious soundstage for media consumption — a baseline expectation at this segment.

The sole differentiator is Bluetooth audio codec support. The Edge 60 Pro includes aptX Adaptive, while the Y400 Pro does not. aptX Adaptive is a higher-tier codec that dynamically adjusts bitrate for lower latency and higher audio quality over Bluetooth — a tangible benefit when paired with compatible wireless headphones, particularly for music listening or gaming where audio sync matters.

The Edge 60 Pro takes a narrow win here. For users who rely on Bluetooth audio with compatible headphones, aptX Adaptive is a meaningful real-world advantage. That said, its impact is conditional on owning hardware that supports the codec — users without aptX Adaptive-compatible headphones will notice no difference, making this category a practical tie for the majority.

The two phones share a solid connectivity foundation — both support 5G, NFC, USB Type-C, GPS with Galileo, and an identical sensor suite including gyroscope, accelerometer, and compass. For the vast majority of everyday connectivity needs, they are functionally equivalent. The key divergences lie in Wi-Fi generation and SIM configuration.

Wi-Fi is where the gap is most technically significant. The Edge 60 Pro supports Wi-Fi 6E, which operates on the 6GHz band in addition to 2.4GHz and 5GHz. This translates to substantially lower congestion, higher throughput, and reduced latency in environments with many connected devices — a modern home, a busy office, or a public venue. The Y400 Pro tops out at Wi-Fi 5, which remains capable but misses out on the 6GHz band entirely and will show its age as Wi-Fi 6E infrastructure becomes more prevalent. On SIM flexibility, the trade goes the other way: the Y400 Pro accommodates two physical SIMs, while the Edge 60 Pro offers one physical SIM plus one eSIM — the latter being more convenient for international travellers who prefer digital switching, but less practical for users who rely on two active physical SIM cards simultaneously.

On balance, the Edge 60 Pro has the connectivity edge, primarily because Wi-Fi 6E is a forward-looking and practically impactful upgrade over Wi-Fi 5. The Y400 Pro's dual physical SIM support is a genuine advantage for a specific user segment, but it does not outweigh the broader wireless networking benefit the Edge 60 Pro brings.

This is a complete tie. Every spec in this group is identical across the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo Y400 Pro — both feature a curved display and a video light, and neither uses sapphire glass or an e-paper display.

The shared curved screen is worth noting as a design choice: curved edges can enhance in-hand ergonomics and give a premium aesthetic, though they also make screen protectors slightly harder to fit. Beyond that, this group offers no differentiating information between the two devices.

This category is a draw — no advantage can be assigned to either phone based solely on the provided data.