Motorola Edge 60 Pro VS Vivo Y400 Pro 5G

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G differ slightly in their design specifications. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is rated as waterproof with an IP68 ingress protection rating, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G is only water resistant with an IP65 rating, offering less protection against water exposure.

In terms of weight, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro weighs 186 g, which is 4 g heavier than the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G at 182 g. The Edge 60 Pro is also slightly thicker at 8.2 mm compared to the Y400 Pro 5G's 7.7 mm. The Edge 60 Pro is narrower at 73.1 mm in width, while the Y400 Pro 5G is a bit wider at 75 mm. When it comes to height, the Motorola model stands at 160.7 mm, which is shorter than the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G's 163.8 mm.

The volume of the two phones is almost identical: the Edge 60 Pro has a volume of 96.33 cm³, and the Y400 Pro 5G's volume is slightly smaller at 94.59 cm³. Neither phone has a rugged build or can be folded, making them similar in that regard.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G share similar display technologies, both featuring OLED/AMOLED panels. However, they differ in key specifications. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a 6.7″ screen size, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a slightly larger 6.77″ display. In terms of pixel density, the Edge 60 Pro offers a sharper 444 ppi, compared to the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G's 388 ppi.

The resolution of the Edge 60 Pro is significantly higher at 1220 x 2712 px, compared to the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G’s 1080 x 2392 px. Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth motion on both screens. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro also outshines the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G in brightness, with a typical brightness of 4500 nits, whereas the Y400 Pro 5G offers 1300 nits.

When it comes to additional features, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports branded damage-resistant glass, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G does not. Both phones support HDR10, but only the Motorola device supports HDR10+, while neither supports Dolby Vision. Neither phone has a secondary screen, but both are touch-enabled.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G both feature strong performance specifications, but there are notable differences. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has 512GB of internal storage, double that of the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G’s 256GB. Additionally, the Motorola device comes with 12GB of RAM, while the Vivo model offers 8GB of RAM.

In terms of the chipset, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 found in the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G. The Edge 60 Pro’s GPU, the Mali G615 MC6, also differs from the Y400 Pro 5G’s Mali G615 MC2, suggesting better graphical capabilities in the Motorola phone. The CPU in the Motorola model has a higher clock speed, with 1 x 3.35 GHz, 3 x 3.2 GHz, and 4 x 2.2 GHz cores, compared to the Vivo model’s 4 x 2.5 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz cores.

The Geekbench 6 results reflect these differences, with the Motorola Edge 60 Pro scoring 4700 in multi-core and 1536 in single-core, significantly outperforming the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G’s 2932 in multi-core and 1026 in single-core. The Motorola device also has a higher GPU clock speed of 1400 MHz, versus 1047 MHz on the Vivo phone. Both devices support 64-bit processing, DirectX 12, integrated graphics, and use big.LITTLE technology, but the Motorola Edge 60 Pro can support up to 24GB of RAM, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G is limited to a maximum of 16GB.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G both feature dual-lens main cameras, but the specifications differ in several ways. The Motorola model boasts a 50 MP + 50 MP + 10 MP setup, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a 50 MP + 2 MP configuration. In terms of aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a wider 1.8f & 2f for its lenses, compared to the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G’s 2.4f & 1.8f.

Both phones offer video recording at 2160 x 30 fps for their main cameras, and both feature a single flash LED, but neither has a dual-tone LED flash. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro benefits from built-in optical image stabilization, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G lacks this feature. Additionally, the Motorola model offers optical zoom with a 3x magnification, whereas the Vivo phone does not have optical zoom, marked as 0x.

For the front cameras, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a 50 MP camera with a 2f wide aperture, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a 32 MP front camera with a slightly wider 2.5f aperture. Both devices support features like slow-motion video recording, manual exposure, touch autofocus, and timelapse, but neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Additionally, both phones lack a front-facing LED flash, dual-lens front camera, and a camera under the display.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G run Android 15 and share a wide array of similar operating system features. They both include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media pickers, and the ability to play games while they download. Both devices also support dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health checks, extra dim modes, dynamic theming, offloading apps, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen, PiP, child locks, widgets, offline voice recognition, and voice commands. Additionally, both phones can track the current position of a mobile device and are multi-user systems.

However, there are a few differences. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro can be used as a PC, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G does not have this feature. Additionally, both devices lack Quick Start, but the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G does not support PiP in the same way as the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, which provides this feature.

Neither phone receives direct OS updates, and both phones have the same limitations when it comes to Mail Privacy Protection and cross-site tracking. Overall, these two devices offer similar operating system functionalities with just a few distinctions in advanced features like PC usage and PiP support.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G have some similarities and differences in their battery specifications. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a larger 6000 mAh battery, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G is equipped with a 5500 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging with a charging speed of 90W. However, the Motorola device has wireless charging capabilities, which the Vivo model lacks.

Both devices have non-removable, rechargeable batteries, and both include a battery level indicator to keep track of battery status. Neither phone offers a removable battery.

In summary, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a higher battery capacity and wireless charging support, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G matches in terms of fast charging speed but lacks wireless charging functionality.

Both the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning neither device supports wired audio connections. However, both smartphones are equipped with stereo speakers for audio output. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports aptX Adaptive, offering improved Bluetooth audio performance, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G does not support aptX Adaptive. Neither device features a radio for FM or other broadcasts.

In summary, both phones provide stereo speakers, but the Motorola Edge 60 Pro stands out with its aptX Adaptive support, which is absent in the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G both support 5G connectivity and offer similar features, though there are a few differences in terms of connectivity and features. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), making the Motorola model more advanced in Wi-Fi technology. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a single SIM and an eSIM, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G supports dual SIM cards.

Both devices feature USB Type-C ports (with USB version 2), NFC, fingerprint scanners, gyroscopes, GPS, a compass, accelerometers, and cellular modules. Neither device offers an external memory slot, emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, or infrared sensors. Both phones support Galileo for satellite positioning.

In terms of additional features, the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G lacks the more advanced features found in the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, such as the latter's superior Wi-Fi version and SIM card options. However, both phones share most essential connectivity and sensor features, with no significant differences in basic functionalities like NFC, fingerprint scanning, or GPS support.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G share several similarities in their miscellaneous features. Both devices include a video light, providing additional lighting for photography and video recording. Neither phone features sapphire glass displays, nor do they have e-paper displays. Both models also come with curved displays, offering a modern, stylish look with edge-screen curvature.

In summary, the two phones are almost identical in this category, with both supporting video lights, curved displays, and lacking sapphire glass and e-paper displays.