Motorola Edge 60 VS Motorola Moto G100 Pro

Both phones share the same IP68 waterproof rating and identical height of 161.2 mm, so they are equally protected against dust and water immersion and occupy the same vertical footprint. Neither offers a rugged build or a foldable form factor, placing them squarely in the mainstream slab category.

Where they diverge meaningfully is in how they feel in the hand. The Edge 60 is notably lighter at 179 g versus 198 g for the G100 Pro — a 19 g difference that is perceptible during extended one-handed use or long calls. The Edge 60 is also slimmer at 7.9 mm compared to 8.65 mm, and narrower at 73.1 mm versus 74.4 mm. These differences compound: the Edge 60's overall volume of roughly 93 cm³ versus the G100 Pro's 104 cm³ means it is a meaningfully more compact package despite being the same height.

The Motorola Edge 60 has a clear advantage in this category. Its lower weight and slimmer, narrower profile make it easier to pocket, more comfortable to grip, and less fatiguing over long sessions — without sacrificing any protection, since both devices carry identical IP68 ratings.

For display purposes, these two phones are effectively identical. Both feature an OLED/AMOLED panel with a 1220 x 2712 px resolution, a 446 ppi pixel density, and a 120Hz refresh rate — meaning sharpness, color vibrancy, deep blacks, and scroll smoothness will be indistinguishable in everyday use. Screen protection is also matched, with Gorilla Glass 7i on both devices offering the same level of scratch and drop resistance.

The only numerical difference is a razor-thin margin in screen size: the Edge 60 measures 6.7″ while the G100 Pro comes in at 6.67″. A 0.03-inch gap is imperceptible in practice and should carry no weight in a buying decision. HDR support is equally matched, with both phones handling HDR10 and HDR10+ content but neither supporting Dolby Vision.

This category is a definitive tie. No matter which device you choose, you are getting the same display technology, the same sharpness, the same smooth refresh rate, and the same glass protection. Display quality simply cannot be a differentiating factor between these two models.

Under the hood, these two devices are carbon copies of one another. Both are powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a 4 nm process, paired with 12 GB of DDR5 RAM running at 6400 MHz and 512 GB of internal storage. The Dimensity 7300 uses an 8-core big.LITTLE configuration — four performance cores at 2.5 GHz and four efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz — which balances responsiveness for demanding tasks with power conservation during lighter workloads.

Benchmark results confirm what the spec sheet implies: both phones score identically at 2932 multi-core and 1026 single-core on Geekbench 6. The shared Mali G615 MC2 GPU clocked at 1047 MHz with DirectX 12 support rounds out a performance profile suited to smooth multitasking, casual gaming, and everyday productivity — though not flagship-tier graphics workloads.

Performance is an unambiguous tie. Every meaningful metric — chipset, RAM, storage, clock speeds, and real-world benchmark scores — is identical. Whichever device you pick, you are getting precisely the same day-to-day and peak performance experience.

The camera system is where these two phones diverge most sharply. The Edge 60 fields a triple rear camera — 50 MP main, 50 MP secondary, and 10 MP telephoto — compared to the G100 Pro's dual rear setup of 50 MP and 8 MP. More significantly, the Edge 60 includes 3x optical zoom and optical image stabilization (OIS), neither of which is present on the G100 Pro. OIS is a particularly meaningful omission: it reduces blur in low-light shots and shaky handheld video in ways that software correction cannot fully replicate.

On the front, the Edge 60 again pulls ahead with a 50 MP selfie camera at f/2.0 versus the G100 Pro's 32 MP sensor at the slightly narrower f/2.2 aperture. The wider aperture on the Edge 60's front camera allows marginally more light in, which can benefit low-light selfies. Both phones top out at 4K at 30 fps for video and share the same suite of manual controls and shooting modes, so the gap is in hardware versatility, not software features.

The Motorola Edge 60 holds a clear and decisive advantage here. The addition of a third lens, true optical zoom, and OIS gives it a meaningfully more versatile and capable camera system — advantages that matter in real shooting scenarios like portraits at distance, dimly lit environments, and handheld video.

Running Android 15 on both devices, the software experience is entirely identical across every measured dimension. Privacy controls — including location options, camera and microphone permissions, app tracking blocks, and clipboard warnings — are matched feature for feature. The same applies to usability staples like split-screen multitasking, picture-in-picture, dynamic theming, customizable notifications, and offline voice recognition.

Notably, neither phone receives direct OS updates from Google, meaning both rely on Motorola's own update pipeline. Neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, or PC desktop mode. These shared omissions are worth flagging for users who prioritize those features, but they level the playing field equally.

This category is a complete tie. Every software feature and privacy capability in the provided data is identical between the two models. The operating system experience will be indistinguishable in daily use, and it should play no role in choosing between them.

Battery is where these two phones make genuinely different trade-offs. The G100 Pro packs a substantially larger 6720 mAh cell compared to the Edge 60's 5500 mAh — a 1220 mAh gap that, all else being equal, translates to meaningfully more screen-on time before needing to reach for a charger. For heavy users or those frequently away from a power source, that extra capacity is a tangible day-to-day advantage.

The Edge 60 counters with significantly faster wired charging at 68W versus the G100 Pro's 30W. In practical terms, the Edge 60 can replenish its battery in roughly half the time — a valuable convenience for users who charge in short bursts throughout the day rather than overnight. Neither phone supports wireless charging, so that factor is off the table for both.

There is no single winner here — it depends on usage habits. The Motorola Moto G100 Pro has the edge for users who prioritize longevity between charges, while the Motorola Edge 60 suits those who value getting back to full power quickly. If topping up speed matters more, the Edge 60 wins; if raw endurance is the priority, the G100 Pro's larger battery is the stronger choice.

The audio specs here are sparse but tell a clear story. Both phones drop the 3.5 mm headphone jack, meaning wired listening requires a USB-C adapter or Bluetooth headphones on either device. Both also feature stereo speakers, which deliver a wider, more immersive soundstage than a single mono speaker — useful for media consumption and hands-free calls.

The one differentiator is that the G100 Pro includes a built-in FM radio, while the Edge 60 does not. For users in areas with good FM coverage, or those who rely on local broadcasts without consuming mobile data, this is a genuine functional advantage — a feature that has quietly disappeared from most modern smartphones.

The Motorola Moto G100 Pro has a narrow edge in this category solely due to its FM radio. For the majority of users this will be a minor consideration, but for those who actively use FM broadcasts, it is the only meaningful audio differentiator between two otherwise identically specified devices.

Across the broad sweep of connectivity, these phones are closely matched — both offer 5G, NFC, USB Type-C, GPS with Galileo support, and identical download and upload speeds of 3270 Mbps. The shared sensor suite, including gyroscope, accelerometer, and compass, covers all the bases for navigation, gaming, and motion-aware apps. Neither phone offers more exotic features like an infrared blaster, barometer, or crash detection.

The meaningful differences come down to SIM flexibility and storage expandability. The Edge 60 supports two physical SIM cards and includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage — a practical advantage for users who juggle two numbers or need more than the built-in 512 GB. The G100 Pro, by contrast, takes a 1 SIM + 1 eSIM approach and omits the memory card slot entirely. eSIM is more convenient for switching carriers digitally, but the lack of expandable storage is a hard ceiling that cannot be worked around later.

The Motorola Edge 60 has a practical edge here for most users, offering greater flexibility through dual physical SIMs and expandable storage. The G100 Pro's eSIM support is a worthwhile modern feature, but losing the memory card slot is a more significant trade-off — particularly given that both phones otherwise sit at the same 512 GB baseline.

This category is light on specs but surfaces one genuine aesthetic differentiator. Both phones share a video light and skip sapphire glass, keeping those attributes level. The only distinction is that the Edge 60 features a curved display, while the G100 Pro uses a flat panel.

A curved screen is largely a design and feel preference. It lends the device a more premium, sleek appearance and can make edge-to-edge swiping feel more natural — but it also makes screen protectors harder to fit and can introduce unintended touch inputs at the edges for some users. The G100 Pro's flat display is simpler to protect and often preferred by users who prioritize practicality over aesthetics.

Whether the Edge 60's curved display is an advantage or a drawback comes down entirely to personal taste. Based strictly on the provided data, the Edge 60 offers a more premium form factor in this category, but users who dislike curved screens will see the G100 Pro's flat panel as the more desirable choice. Neither is objectively superior — this is a style decision, not a capability gap.