Motorola Moto G (2026) VS Motorola Moto G67 Power

In terms of design, the Motorola Moto G (2026) and the Motorola Moto G67 Power are remarkably close siblings. Both share the same water resistance rating, neither features a rugged build, and neither can be folded — so on those shared traits, users get identical protection and form factor. The real story is in the subtle dimensional and weight differences.

The Moto G (2026) is marginally lighter at 202 g versus 210 g for the G67 Power — an 8 g gap that, while small on paper, can be perceptible during extended one-handed use or long calls. The G (2026) is also fractionally thinner at 8.5 mm compared to 8.6 mm, and its slightly taller but narrower profile gives it a nearly identical overall volume (108.6 cm³ vs 109.3 cm³). In practice, the two phones will feel almost indistinguishable in a pocket or bag.

The Moto G (2026) holds a narrow design edge solely due to its lower weight. For users who prioritize a lighter feel in daily handling, it wins this category — but only just. Anyone who doesn't notice an 8 g difference will find these two phones effectively tied in design.

Both phones share the same 6.7-inch LCD IPS panel and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate, so motion fluidity and screen real estate are identical. Where they part ways sharply is resolution: the Moto G67 Power renders at 1080 x 2400 px — a full HD+ panel — while the Moto G (2026) tops out at 720 x 1604 px, an HD+ panel. Stretched across the same 6.7-inch canvas, that translates to a pixel density of 391 ppi versus just 263 ppi. The difference is visible: text appears crisper, fine UI details are sharper, and images look more defined on the G67 Power.

The G67 Power also supports HDR10, meaning compatible streaming content — from services like Netflix or YouTube — is rendered with a wider dynamic range, more nuanced highlights and shadows. The Moto G (2026) lacks this capability entirely. On top of that, the G67 Power's Gorilla Glass 7i is a meaningfully newer generation than the Gorilla Glass 3 on the G (2026), offering improved scratch and drop resistance — a practical durability advantage in daily use.

The Moto G67 Power wins this category decisively. Its higher resolution and pixel density alone would be enough, but adding HDR10 support and a newer generation of protective glass makes it the clearly superior display package across sharpness, content quality, and screen durability.

The chipset gap here is substantial. The Moto G67 Power runs on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 built on a 4 nm process, while the Moto G (2026) uses a MediaTek Dimensity 6300 on a 6 nm node. A smaller semiconductor process generally means greater power efficiency and more transistors in the same space — a meaningful architectural head start for the G67 Power before even looking at benchmark numbers.

The benchmarks reinforce that gap convincingly. In Geekbench 6, the G67 Power scores 2970 multi-core and 1015 single-core, versus 2012 multi-core and 782 single-core for the G (2026) — roughly a 48% multi-core advantage. In everyday terms, that translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and more headroom for demanding tasks. The G67 Power also doubles the RAM — 8 GB versus 4 GB — and pairs it with faster DDR5 memory running at 3200 MHz, compared to DDR4 at 2133 MHz on the G (2026). Higher memory bandwidth (25.6 GB/s vs 17.07 GB/s) means data flows more freely between the CPU and RAM, reducing bottlenecks under load. Storage follows the same pattern: 256 GB versus 128 GB.

The Moto G67 Power wins performance comprehensively. Faster chip, more efficient process node, double the RAM with a newer and faster memory standard, and twice the storage — every meaningful performance dimension favors it over the Moto G (2026).

On the surface, these two cameras look nearly identical — both lead with a 50 MP primary sensor, match on a 32 MP front camera, and share the same autofocus suite, manual controls, and slow-motion capability. Dig a little deeper, though, and two meaningful gaps emerge. The secondary rear lens on the Moto G67 Power is 8 MP compared to just 2 MP on the Moto G (2026). A 2 MP auxiliary sensor is largely a depth-assist unit with limited practical imaging value; an 8 MP lens can actually contribute usable image data, making it a more functional part of the dual-camera setup.

The bigger differentiator is video. The G (2026) caps out at 1080p at 30 fps, while the G67 Power records at 4K (2160p) at 30 fps — four times the pixel count per frame. For anyone who shoots video with the intention of cropping, reframing in post, or simply preserving higher-quality footage, this is a tangible real-world advantage. The G67 Power also has two flash LEDs versus one on the G (2026), which can provide more even illumination in low-light still photography.

The Moto G67 Power wins the camera comparison, and not just narrowly. Its 4K video capability is the headline advantage — a feature the G (2026) cannot match at any setting — backed by a more capable secondary lens and an extra flash LED. Users who prioritize photo shooting and rarely record video will notice less difference, but for video-oriented users the gap is clear.

Across the entire feature set provided, these two phones are functionally identical in software — every privacy control, productivity feature, and customization option is shared between them. The sole differentiator is the Android version: the Moto G (2026) ships with Android 16, while the Moto G67 Power runs Android 15. Neither device receives direct OS updates according to the provided data, which makes the out-of-box version more significant than it might otherwise be — what you get at launch is likely what you keep for longer.

A newer Android version means access to the latest platform-level security patches, privacy refinements, and any behavioral or UI improvements Google introduced between the two releases. For a user who values being on a current, secure baseline from day one, starting on Android 16 rather than Android 15 is a genuine advantage — even if the practical day-to-day feature differences between adjacent Android versions are often subtle.

The Moto G (2026) holds a narrow but real edge here, strictly by virtue of its newer Android version. Given that neither phone is flagged for direct OS updates, shipping one generation ahead means the G (2026) starts from a more current security and platform foundation — which matters most to users who prioritize longevity and software currency.

Battery capacity is where the Moto G67 Power makes its most assertive statement of the entire comparison. Its 7000 mAh cell dwarfs the 5200 mAh battery in the Moto G (2026) — a 35% larger reserve that, all else being equal, translates directly into significantly more time between charges. For heavy users, travelers, or anyone who regularly ends the day with a near-dead phone, that gap is genuinely consequential rather than a paper spec.

What makes the comparison even more interesting is that both phones charge at an identical 30W — meaning the G67 Power's larger battery takes proportionally longer to refill from empty. That is a reasonable trade-off for most users who top up regularly, but worth noting for anyone who relies on quick, full-charge sessions. Neither device supports wireless charging or reverse wireless charging, so both are limited to wired top-ups only.

The Moto G67 Power wins this category clearly. The name ″Power″ is earned: a 1800 mAh advantage at the same charging speed means substantially longer endurance, and for a segment of users where battery anxiety is a daily concern, the G67 Power is the more compelling choice by a significant margin.

Audio is the rare category where these two phones are in complete lockstep. Both carry a 3.5 mm headphone jack — a feature increasingly absent from mid-range devices — alongside stereo speakers and dual microphones. For wired audio users, the headphone jack remains the most practical spec here, enabling use of any standard earphones or headphones without an adapter.

Neither device supports any high-resolution Bluetooth audio codec — no aptX, no LDAC, no aptX HD or Adaptive. That means wireless listeners are limited to standard Bluetooth audio quality regardless of headphone quality. It is a shared limitation, but one worth noting for audiophiles who prioritize lossless wireless playback. The dual-microphone setup on both phones provides the baseline needed for noise reduction during calls and voice recording, though both are identically equipped on this front as well.

This category is a complete tie. Every specified audio feature — speaker configuration, jack availability, codec support, and microphone count — is identical across both phones. The choice between them will have to rest on the meaningful differences found in other categories.

Across the core connectivity checklist — 5G, NFC, dual SIM, USB Type-C, Wi-Fi 5, fingerprint scanner, and a full suite of location and motion sensors — these two phones are evenly matched and well-equipped for a mid-range device. The meaningful separators come down to three specific specs. First, the Moto G (2026) includes an external memory slot, while the Moto G67 Power does not. Given that the G67 Power already ships with 256 GB of internal storage this omission stings less, but for users who prefer to expand storage independently or swap media cards, the G (2026) retains a flexibility advantage.

The G (2026) also edges ahead on peak download speed at 3300 Mbits/s versus 2900 Mbits/s — a difference that is unlikely to be felt in everyday browsing or streaming but could matter in sustained large-file transfers over a strong 5G connection. More practically notable is the presence of a barometer on the G (2026), absent on the G67 Power. A barometer enables more accurate altitude readings for navigation and fitness apps, and feeds into weather and environmental sensing — a niche but genuine functional addition.

The Moto G (2026) takes a narrow edge in this category. The expandable storage slot, higher download ceiling, and barometer collectively give it more hardware flexibility than the G67 Power, even if none of these advantages will matter equally to every user. For those who never use microSD cards or altitude-based apps, the gap narrows considerably.

The miscellaneous spec group offers no differentiators whatsoever between these two phones. Both have a video light, and both skip sapphire glass, curved displays, and e-paper panels — none of which are realistic expectations at this price tier in any case.

This is a complete tie. With only four data points provided and every one of them identical, this category has no bearing on the decision between the Moto G (2026) and the Moto G67 Power. Users should weigh the meaningful distinctions found in other spec groups — performance, display, battery, and cameras — when making their choice.