Motorola Moto G100 Pro VS Motorola Moto G86 Power

In terms of design, the Motorola Moto G100 Pro and the Motorola Moto G86 Power are remarkably close siblings. Both share the same 161.2 mm height and identical 198 g weight, meaning neither will feel noticeably taller or heavier than the other in day-to-day use. At this weight class, both sit comfortably in the mid-range range — substantial enough to feel premium, but not so heavy as to cause fatigue during extended use.

The differences that do exist are marginal. The G100 Pro is fractionally slimmer at 8.65 mm versus the G86 Power's 8.7 mm, and slightly narrower at 74.4 mm compared to 74.7 mm. These translate to a small but real difference in overall volume: 103.74 cm³ versus 104.76 cm³. In practice, neither delta is something a user would perceive without placing both phones side by side with calipers — the physical experience of holding either device will be virtually indistinguishable.

Where both phones stand on equal footing is protection: each carries a full IP68 rating, meaning both are rated for waterproofing under sustained submersion conditions — a genuinely useful real-world feature for accidental drops in water. Neither offers a rugged build or a foldable form factor. Overall, this group is essentially a tie: the G100 Pro holds a barely measurable geometric edge in compactness, but no meaningful design advantage separates these two devices.

The display category delivers a clean verdict: these two phones are spec-for-spec identical across every measured dimension. Both feature a 6.67″ OLED/AMOLED panel running at a 1220 x 2712 px resolution, which works out to a sharp 446 ppi pixel density — well above the threshold where individual pixels become imperceptible to the naked eye under normal use. Content, text, and UI elements will look equally crisp on both devices.

The shared 120Hz refresh rate means scrolling, animations, and gaming will feel equally fluid on either phone. Coupled with HDR10+ support, both are equipped to render high-dynamic-range content with expanded contrast and color depth on compatible streaming platforms. Neither supports Dolby Vision, so there is no distinction to draw on that front. Both also carry Gorilla Glass 7i protection, offering the same level of scratch and drop resistance for the panel.

This group is a complete tie. There is not a single display specification that separates the G100 Pro from the G86 Power — the panels are, by every available metric, equivalent. A buyer prioritizing screen quality will find no reason to favor one over the other based on this category alone.

Under the hood, both phones are built around the same foundation: the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 chipset, fabbed on a 4 nm process, paired with a Mali G615 MC2 GPU. Benchmark results confirm the parity — both score identically at 2932 (multi-core) and 1026 (single-core) on Geekbench 6. In practice, users of either device can expect the same level of responsiveness for everyday tasks, casual gaming, and media consumption.

The only meaningful separation between these two devices in this category comes down to RAM: the G100 Pro ships with 12GB, while the G86 Power comes with 8GB. Both use the same DDR5 memory running at 6400 MHz, so the quality of the RAM is equal — but quantity matters for sustained multitasking. With 12GB, the G100 Pro can keep more apps active in the background simultaneously before the system is forced to reload them, which translates to a smoother experience when switching between multiple demanding applications. The 8GB in the G86 Power is still a solid mid-range allocation, but it will hit its ceiling sooner under heavier workloads.

The Moto G100 Pro holds a clear edge in this group purely on the strength of its additional RAM. Raw processing power is a draw, but the extra 4GB of memory gives it a tangible advantage for power users who multitask heavily or want more headroom for future software demands.

On paper, the camera systems of these two phones look nearly identical: both sport a dual-lens rear setup with a 50 MP primary and an 8 MP secondary camera, a 32 MP front shooter, and identical 4K/30fps video recording capability. The feature set — phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during video, slow-motion, HDR mode, and a full suite of manual controls — is shared across both devices. For the vast majority of shooting scenarios, the two will produce comparable results.

The decisive differentiator, however, is that the Moto G86 Power includes optical image stabilization (OIS), while the G100 Pro does not. OIS is a hardware mechanism that physically compensates for hand tremor during capture, and its impact is most felt in low-light photography — where longer exposures amplify shake — and during handheld video recording. Without OIS, the G100 Pro must rely entirely on software-based stabilization, which typically produces less natural-looking results and cannot fully offset blur in still images taken in dim conditions. There is also a marginal aperture advantage on the G86 Power's secondary lens at f/1.8 versus the G100 Pro's f/1.88, though this difference is too small to produce a perceptible real-world impact.

The Moto G86 Power takes a clear edge in this category. OIS is not a minor spec checkbox — it is a practical, hardware-level advantage that meaningfully elevates photo and video quality in challenging conditions, and its absence on the G100 Pro is a notable gap given how closely matched everything else is.

Both phones ship with Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every tracked OS dimension. Privacy controls — including location options, camera and microphone permissions, app tracking blockers, and clipboard warnings — are present on both. Practical productivity features like split-screen multitasking, picture-in-picture, full-page screenshots, and widget support are equally available. Neither device gets direct OS updates from Google, meaning both rely on Motorola's update pipeline.

It is worth noting what both phones lack: neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, or cross-site tracking blocking. These are not deal-breakers, but they represent gaps relative to some competing platforms. On the positive side, both include on-device machine learning, offline voice recognition, and dynamic theming — capabilities that contribute to a more capable and personalized experience without requiring a cloud connection.

This category is a complete tie. Every OS feature and privacy capability is identical across the G100 Pro and the G86 Power. A buyer weighing software experience, privacy controls, or Android feature depth will find absolutely no basis for differentiation between these two devices here.

Battery is another category where these two phones are carbon copies of each other. Both pack a substantial 6720 mAh cell — a notably large capacity that positions them firmly in the endurance-focused segment of the mid-range market. For most users, a battery of this size comfortably covers a full day of heavy use and can stretch well into a second day under moderate usage patterns.

Charging is equally matched: both support fast charging at 30W, with no wireless charging option on either device. At 30W, a full charge from near-empty will take roughly an hour or more depending on conditions — adequate for overnight charging but not in the league of the faster 65W or 120W systems found on some competitors. The absence of wireless charging is a shared limitation, though not unusual at this price tier.

This group is an unambiguous tie. Capacity, charging speed, and every other battery attribute are identical between the G100 Pro and the G86 Power. Longevity and charging convenience will be indistinguishable in real-world use.

Audio is a short story for both devices, and an identical one. Neither the G100 Pro nor the G86 Power includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, which means wired listening requires a USB-C adapter or a switch to Bluetooth. This is an increasingly common trade-off at this tier, but it remains a practical inconvenience for users with a library of wired headphones.

On the wireless audio quality front, both phones omit advanced Bluetooth codecs entirely — no aptX, no LDAC, no aptX HD or Adaptive. The absence of LDAC in particular is worth flagging for audiophiles, as it is the codec that enables near-lossless audio transmission over Bluetooth. Without it, both phones are limited to standard SBC or AAC quality when streaming to wireless headphones, which is perfectly serviceable for casual listening but falls short for those who prioritize high-fidelity audio. The one positive shared between them is stereo speakers, which at minimum provides a more immersive media experience than a single mono driver.

This group is a tie, though one that reflects shared limitations rather than shared strengths. Neither phone offers an advantage over the other, and buyers who place significant weight on audio quality — whether wired or wireless — will find both devices equally constrained by the same set of omissions.

Across the core connectivity pillars — 5G, Wi-Fi 6, NFC, GPS, and USB Type-C — both phones are evenly matched and well-equipped for a modern mid-range device. The shared 5G support and identical download/upload speeds of 3270 Mbits/s mean neither has a cellular throughput advantage. The sensor suite, including gyroscope, accelerometer, and compass, is also identical, covering all bases for navigation, gaming, and motion-based applications.

Two differences stand out. First, the Moto G86 Power includes an external memory card slot, while the G100 Pro does not. Given that both phones cap internal storage at 512GB, this is a meaningful distinction for users who shoot a lot of video, store large media libraries, or simply prefer the flexibility of expandable storage without cloud dependence. Second, the G86 Power ships with Bluetooth 5.3 versus the G100 Pro's 5.2. While the generational gap is minor, 5.3 brings incremental improvements in connection efficiency and reliability that can benefit users with multiple paired Bluetooth devices.

The Moto G86 Power takes the edge in this category. The addition of expandable storage is a tangible, practical advantage that the G100 Pro simply cannot match, and the marginally newer Bluetooth version adds a small but real connectivity benefit on top of that.

The miscellaneous category offers very little to analyze, as both phones share every available data point. Each includes a video light — essentially the flash repurposed for continuous illumination during video recording, a small but practical feature for vloggers or anyone shooting in dim environments. Neither device features a curved display, sapphire glass, or an e-paper panel, all of which are niche or premium characteristics not typically expected at this price tier.

This group is a tie in the most literal sense: there is not a single differentiating factor between the two devices across any of the tracked miscellaneous attributes. Buyers will find no basis for preference here, and the category adds no meaningful signal to the overall comparison.