Motorola Moto G67 Power VS Realme P3

Both phones share a similar slim, non-rugged candybar form factor, but the Realme P3 is meaningfully more compact and lighter across every physical dimension. It is 16 grams lighter (194 g vs. 210 g), fractionally thinner (8 mm vs. 8.6 mm), and shorter and narrower, resulting in a noticeably smaller overall volume (98.8 cm³ vs. 109.3 cm³). In daily use, that weight difference is perceptible during extended one-handed use or long calls, and the slimmer profile makes it easier to pocket.

The more significant differentiator is water protection. The Moto G67 Power carries an IP64 rating, meaning it is water-resistant — protected against splashes and water jets, but not submersion. The Realme P3 steps up to IP68, which classifies it as waterproof and capable of withstanding immersion in water under defined conditions. For most everyday scenarios like rain or accidental spills both phones are fine, but IP68 provides genuine peace of mind if the device is dropped in a sink or shallow water.

Overall, the Realme P3 holds a clear advantage in this group. It wins on both physical ergonomics — being lighter and more compact — and on the more robust IP68 waterproofing standard, making it the better-designed device for portability and environmental durability based strictly on these specs.

The foundational split here is panel technology. The Moto G67 Power uses an IPS LCD, while the Realme P3 opts for an OLED/AMOLED panel. This is the single most impactful display difference between the two: AMOLED produces true blacks by turning off individual pixels, delivers higher contrast, and renders colors with greater vibrancy — advantages that are immediately visible when watching video or scrolling through photos. The LCD on the G67 Power will appear flatter and less punchy by comparison, even under identical content.

Where the two phones converge almost entirely is in size, sharpness, and motion handling. Both offer a near-identical 6.7-inch screen, the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, effectively identical pixel density (~391–395 ppi), and a 120Hz refresh rate — so scrolling smoothness and text clarity are on par. The G67 Power does carry one counterpoint: it features branded damage-resistant glass and HDR10 support, whereas the Realme P3 lacks both. HDR10 enables richer tone mapping on compatible content, and scratch-resistant glass adds practical durability that the P3 cannot match on paper.

On balance, the Realme P3 has the display edge for most users. The AMOLED panel's contrast and color advantages outweigh the G67 Power's HDR10 and glass protection benefits in everyday visual experience. However, buyers who prioritize screen durability or frequently consume HDR-certified content may find the G67 Power's trade-offs worth considering.

Both phones are built on a 4nm process with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, so their baseline credentials look identical on paper. The chipset difference, however, is meaningful: the Moto G67 Power runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Realme P3 uses the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4. In Geekbench 6, the P3 pulls ahead in both single-core (1104 vs. 1015) and multi-core (3105 vs. 2970) results, indicating a modest but real CPU performance advantage that translates to snappier app launches and slightly faster compute-heavy tasks.

The picture gets more nuanced when examining memory and efficiency. The G67 Power's RAM operates at 3200 MHz versus the P3's 2750 MHz, and its maximum memory bandwidth is a striking 25.6 GB/s compared to the P3's 12 GB/s — more than double. High memory bandwidth accelerates data-heavy workloads like multitasking, large file handling, and feeding the GPU with assets. Offsetting the P3's CPU lead, the G67 Power also runs at a lower 5W TDP versus the P3's 7W, suggesting it achieves its performance more efficiently, which can benefit sustained workloads and thermal management over time.

Declaring a clear winner here requires nuance. The Realme P3 leads on raw CPU throughput per the benchmarks, making it the faster chip for everyday responsiveness. But the G67 Power's commanding memory bandwidth advantage and lower power envelope give it a structural edge in memory-intensive and sustained scenarios. For general use the P3 feels faster; for heavy multitasking or efficiency-sensitive workloads, the G67 Power's architecture holds its own.

At 50MP each, the primary sensors are evenly matched in resolution, but two meaningful differences emerge immediately. The Realme P3's main lens opens to f/1.8 versus the G67 Power's f/2.2, letting in noticeably more light — an advantage in dimly lit environments. More importantly, the P3 includes optical image stabilization (OIS), which the G67 Power lacks entirely. OIS is one of the most impactful camera features in practice: it compensates for hand tremor during video recording and improves sharpness in low-light stills where longer exposures are needed. For anyone who shoots a lot of video or photography in challenging light, this is a significant gap.

The secondary camera tells a different story. The G67 Power pairs its main sensor with an 8MP lens, which at that resolution is likely a functional ultrawide or depth-assist camera. The Realme P3's secondary camera is just 2MP — a resolution so low it functions almost exclusively as a depth sensor for portrait mode, offering minimal standalone utility. Selfie shooters will also notice the G67 Power's 32MP front camera versus the P3's 16MP, doubling the resolution for portraits and video calls, while its slightly wider f/2.2 aperture (vs. f/2.4 on the P3) also edges ahead in selfie low-light performance.

This group is genuinely split between two different strengths. The Realme P3 has the edge for main camera quality — its wider aperture and OIS combine to produce more stable video and better low-light photos. The Moto G67 Power counters with selfie versatility and a more capable secondary lens. Users who prioritize video recording or night photography should lean toward the P3; those who value front-camera resolution or secondary lens utility will find the G67 Power more compelling.

This is a rare case of a complete draw. Both the Motorola Moto G67 Power and the Realme P3 run Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every data point in this group — from privacy controls like location and camera/microphone permissions, to productivity features like split-screen, Picture-in-Picture, and widgets, to quality-of-life additions like dynamic theming, dark mode, and on-device machine learning.

Notably, neither phone receives direct OS updates from Google, meaning both rely on their respective manufacturers to push Android updates — a consideration for users who prioritize long-term software support. Neither offers Wi-Fi password sharing or Focus modes, which are features some competing platforms provide. These are shared limitations, not differentiators between the two.

Based strictly on the provided specs, this group is an exact tie. There is no feature present on one device that is absent from the other, and no version differences to separate them. A buyer's software experience will be defined almost entirely by each manufacturer's UI skin and update cadence — factors that fall outside the scope of this data.

Battery capacity is where the Moto G67 Power makes its most emphatic statement. Its 7000 mAh cell is a full 1000 mAh larger than the Realme P3's already-generous 6000 mAh — a 17% increase that, all else being equal, translates directly into longer time between charges. For heavy users, travelers, or anyone who regularly goes a full day without access to a charger, that extra headroom is genuinely useful rather than a marginal spec bump.

The trade-off comes at the charger. The Realme P3 supports 45W fast charging versus the G67 Power's 30W, meaning the P3 can replenish its battery significantly faster when plugged in. In practical terms, the P3 will go from low to full in less time, which matters for users who charge in short bursts — during a commute or a lunch break. The G67 Power's larger tank partially compensates by needing fewer top-ups, but when it does need charging, it will lag behind.

Neither phone offers wireless charging, so the decision here comes down to usage pattern. The Moto G67 Power wins on endurance — its larger battery is a meaningful real-world advantage for longevity between charges. The Realme P3 counters with faster replenishment, making it the better pick for users who charge frequently and value speed over raw capacity. For most users who prioritize going longer without reaching for a cable, the G67 Power holds the edge in this group.

The audio spec sheet for these two phones is nearly identical, with one exception that will matter to a specific group of users: the Moto G67 Power retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, while the Realme P3 does not. For anyone who uses wired headphones — whether for sound quality, convenience, or avoiding the need to charge earbuds — this is a straightforward and practical advantage. It also means the G67 Power can be used with wired audio without occupying the charging port or requiring a dongle.

Beyond that single distinction, the two phones are evenly matched. Both feature stereo speakers, which deliver a wider, more immersive soundstage than mono setups for media consumption and calls. Neither device supports any high-resolution Bluetooth audio codec — no aptX, LDAC, or their variants — so wireless audio quality is capped at standard Bluetooth levels on both, and neither has a built-in radio.

Given the near-total overlap, the Moto G67 Power holds a clear edge in this group solely by virtue of its headphone jack. It offers a superset of the P3's audio connectivity without sacrificing anything in return. Users who have already transitioned fully to wireless audio will find this difference irrelevant, but for everyone else, the G67 Power is simply the more flexible option.

The two phones share a strong connectivity foundation — 5G, NFC, dual SIM, USB-C, GPS, and Galileo — but the Realme P3 pulls ahead in wireless networking. It supports Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) in addition to Wi-Fi 5 and Wi-Fi 4, while the G67 Power tops out at Wi-Fi 5. Wi-Fi 6 delivers better throughput, lower latency, and improved performance in congested environments with many connected devices — a meaningful upgrade for home networks and busy public spaces. The P3 also has a slightly newer Bluetooth 5.2 versus the G67 Power's 5.1, which brings marginal improvements in connection reliability and audio handling, though the real-world difference at this version gap is modest.

Two additional differentiators stand out. The Realme P3 includes an infrared sensor, which allows the phone to function as a universal remote for TVs and home appliances — a niche but genuinely practical feature the G67 Power lacks entirely. On the cellular side, both phones match each other at 2900 Mbits/s download, but the P3 edges ahead with 1600 Mbits/s upload versus 1500 Mbits/s — a minor difference relevant mainly to users who frequently upload large files or stream live video.

The Realme P3 holds a clear advantage in this group. Its Wi-Fi 6 support is the most impactful differentiator, offering a future-proof connectivity upgrade over the G67 Power's Wi-Fi 5 ceiling. The infrared sensor and Bluetooth 5.2 add further breadth to its feature set. The G67 Power matches the P3 on all core connectivity specs but lacks any exclusive advantage to offset these gaps.

The miscellaneous spec group for these two phones is a complete mirror image. Both have a video light, neither has a sapphire glass display, a curved display, or an e-paper display — every data point is identical.

This group is an exact tie with no differentiators to analyze. Based strictly on the provided specs, neither phone holds any advantage over the other here.