Motorola Moto G86 Power VS Realme P4 Pro 5G

In terms of physical footprint, the two phones are nearly identical siblings — both are tall, similar in width, and neither folds or carries a rugged build. The real divergence lies in their cross-sections: the Realme P4 Pro 5G is meaningfully slimmer at 7.7 mm versus the Moto G86 Power's 8.7 mm, and that 1 mm gap is genuinely noticeable in-hand and in-pocket. Combined with a 9 g weight advantage (189 g vs 198 g) and a notably smaller total volume (95.2 cm³ vs 104.8 cm³), the Realme simply feels like the more refined, pocketable device in day-to-day carry.

However, the Motorola Moto G86 Power reclaims ground on a more critical dimension: water protection. Its IP68 rating means it can withstand full submersion in fresh water (typically up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes), while the Realme's IP66 certification covers only high-pressure water jets — not immersion. For users who swim, drop their phone in a sink, or frequently use it in rain, this is a meaningful real-world safety gap that the sleeker chassis of the Realme cannot compensate for.

The design comparison ultimately comes down to a clear trade-off: the Realme P4 Pro 5G wins on form factor — lighter, thinner, and more compact — while the Moto G86 Power holds a significant edge in water protection durability. If portability and aesthetics are the priority, the Realme leads; if long-term resilience against liquid exposure matters more, the Motorola is the stronger choice.

Both phones share the same OLED/AMOLED panel technology and identical Gorilla Glass 7i protection, so the baseline display quality and durability story is equal. Where they diverge is in the refinements on top of that foundation. The Realme P4 Pro 5G edges ahead with a slightly larger 6.8″ screen versus 6.67″, a marginally sharper 453 ppi pixel density (vs 446 ppi), and a higher 1280 x 2800 px resolution — though in practice, at these pixel densities, the sharpness difference between the two is essentially imperceptible to the naked eye.

The more meaningful gap is the refresh rate: the Realme's 144Hz panel versus the Moto G86 Power's 120Hz. While both are firmly in the smooth-scrolling tier that most users find comfortable, 144Hz does deliver a noticeably more fluid experience in fast-paced gaming and rapid UI navigation for those sensitive to it. More practically, the Realme also supports an Always-On Display, a feature the Motorola lacks entirely — meaning at-a-glance time, notifications, and widgets without waking the screen, which is a genuine daily convenience on an OLED panel where individual pixels power off to contain battery drain.

Both devices support HDR10+ and share the same Dolby Vision omission, so streaming HDR content is equally capable on either. Overall, the Realme P4 Pro 5G holds a clear edge in the display category — not because of raw panel quality, which is comparable, but because of the higher refresh rate and Always-On Display functionality that translate directly into a more capable and convenient everyday screen experience.

At the silicon level, these two phones take notably different approaches. The Motorola Moto G86 Power runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 with a straightforward two-cluster CPU, while the Realme P4 Pro 5G deploys a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 with a more sophisticated tri-cluster layout — a prime core at 2.8 GHz, four performance cores at 2.4 GHz, and three efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. That architecture gives the Realme a higher peak single-core ceiling, which matters most for tasks like gaming launches, app cold starts, and compute-heavy workloads.

The memory picture is more nuanced. The Realme's 12 GB of RAM versus the Moto's 8 GB is a tangible advantage for heavy multitaskers — more apps stay resident in memory, reducing reload times when switching between them. However, the Motorola counters with significantly faster RAM speed at 6400 MHz compared to the Realme's 4200 MHz, meaning its memory bus throughput is considerably higher. In practice, faster RAM benefits CPU-GPU data transfer and overall system responsiveness, partially offsetting the capacity gap. GPU clock speed is essentially a wash — the Moto's 1047 MHz versus the Realme's 1000 MHz is too marginal to produce a real-world difference.

On balance, the Realme P4 Pro 5G holds the performance edge: the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4's stronger peak CPU performance combined with 50% more RAM makes it the more capable chip for sustained workloads and multitasking. The Motorola's RAM speed advantage is a genuine technical merit, but it does not overcome the Realme's lead in raw compute headroom and memory capacity where everyday use is concerned.

The rear camera systems start from the same anchor point — both phones lead with a 50 MP main sensor at f/2.2 with OIS — but diverge sharply on the secondary lens. The Motorola pairs its main shooter with an 8 MP ultra-wide, while the Realme's second lens is only 2 MP, which at that resolution is effectively a depth-assist sensor with negligible standalone utility. For users who regularly shoot wide-angle scenes, landscapes, or architecture, the Moto G86 Power's secondary camera is meaningfully more useful in practice.

Video recording flips the advantage back to the Realme. It captures 4K footage at 60 fps versus the Motorola's 4K at 30 fps — a genuine difference for anyone recording action, sports, or content intended for smooth slow-motion downsampling. The feature set surrounding both cameras is otherwise identical: phase-detection autofocus, continuous AF during recording, HDR mode, and a full manual control suite are present on both.

The front camera is where the Realme P4 Pro 5G pulls furthest ahead: a 50 MP selfie sensor dwarfs the Motorola's 32 MP equivalent, and while megapixels alone don't tell the full story, the higher resolution does allow for more aggressive cropping and greater detail in portrait shots. The Moto's front aperture is slightly wider at f/2.2 versus the Realme's f/2.4, theoretically aiding low-light selfies, but the resolution gap still favors the Realme for most use cases. Overall, the Moto G86 Power wins on rear versatility thanks to its more capable ultra-wide, while the Realme P4 Pro 5G leads on video quality and selfie resolution — making it the stronger all-round camera package for content creators and video-focused users.

This is a rare category where the data tells a clear and unambiguous story: the Motorola Moto G86 Power and the Realme P4 Pro 5G are in a complete tie. Every single specification in this group is identical across both devices — they run the same Android 15 base, share the same privacy controls, and support the same feature set from dynamic theming and split-screen multitasking to offline voice recognition and Picture-in-Picture mode.

The shared highlights are worth noting for prospective buyers. Both phones offer a robust privacy toolkit including camera and microphone access controls, app tracking blockers, and location privacy options — all features that have become baseline expectations on modern Android. Practical productivity tools like split-screen support, customizable notifications, full-page screenshots, and widget support are present on both, as is on-device machine learning for smarter, offline-capable features. Neither device receives direct OS updates from Google, meaning both rely on their respective manufacturers for software rollouts.

With no differentiating data points anywhere in this group, the operating system category is a straightforward draw. A buyer choosing between these two phones will find no software-level advantage on either side — the decision rests entirely on the hardware differences covered in other categories.

Both phones pack unusually large batteries by mid-range standards, but the Realme P4 Pro 5G pulls ahead on both dimensions that matter here. Its 7000 mAh cell edges out the Moto G86 Power's already-generous 6720 mAh — a modest 280 mAh gap that translates to a marginal real-world difference in endurance, likely amounting to 20–30 extra minutes of screen-on time at most. For the vast majority of users, either battery will comfortably last a full day and push well into a second.

The charging speed gap, however, is anything but marginal. The Realme's 80W fast charging versus the Motorola's 30W is a decisive practical advantage. At 80W, a depleted battery can realistically be brought to full charge in roughly 45–55 minutes; at 30W, the same task on the Moto takes well over an hour and a half. For anyone who charges during a lunch break, a commute, or a short window between meetings, this difference directly changes how they interact with the device day to day.

Neither phone supports wireless charging, and both have sealed, non-removable batteries — so those factors are a wash. The Realme P4 Pro 5G is the clear winner in this category: it combines a larger battery with dramatically faster replenishment, offering a more capable and convenient power package overall.

Wired audio is off the table for both phones — neither carries a 3.5 mm headphone jack, so wireless listening is the primary audio path for both. On speaker output they are evenly matched, with stereo speakers present on each device. The meaningful split comes down to Bluetooth audio codec support, where the two phones diverge significantly.

The Realme P4 Pro 5G supports both aptX and LDAC, while the Motorola Moto G86 Power supports neither. These codecs are not just marketing checkboxes — they represent substantially higher-quality wireless audio transmission. LDAC in particular, developed by Sony, transmits up to three times more data than standard SBC Bluetooth, meaning compatible headphones can receive near-lossless audio wirelessly. For users who own premium Bluetooth headphones or earbuds that support these codecs, the Realme will deliver noticeably richer, more detailed sound; the Motorola will fall back to the lower-bitrate SBC codec regardless of headphone quality.

It is worth noting that neither phone reaches the top tier of wireless audio — aptX HD and aptX Adaptive are absent from both. Still, for the codec support that is present in this data, the Realme P4 Pro 5G holds a clear advantage in the audio category, making it the more compelling choice for anyone who takes wireless headphone listening seriously.

Across the bulk of this category, the two phones are remarkably alike — both support 5G, Wi-Fi 6, NFC, USB Type-C, and an identical sensor suite covering GPS, gyroscope, accelerometer, and compass. The shared foundation is strong and modern for the mid-range tier. The differences, while few, are meaningful depending on individual priorities.

Storage expandability is the sharpest trade-off: the Motorola Moto G86 Power includes a microSD card slot, while the Realme P4 Pro 5G does not. For users who rely on external storage to expand capacity cheaply or transfer files between devices, this is a genuine functional advantage for the Moto. The Realme counters on SIM flexibility — it accommodates two physical SIMs, whereas the Motorola offers only one physical SIM alongside an eSIM. Dual-SIM support is highly practical for travelers or anyone managing separate personal and work numbers on one device, and physical dual-SIM remains more universally compatible than eSIM in many regions. The Realme also carries a marginally newer Bluetooth 5.4 versus the Moto's 5.3, which brings minor improvements in connection efficiency, though this difference is unlikely to be perceptible in everyday use.

Neither phone offers a clear sweep in this category — it comes down to user needs. The Moto G86 Power is the better fit for those who want expandable storage, while the Realme P4 Pro 5G suits users who need dual physical SIM capability. On the remaining specs, they are effectively tied.

The Miscellaneous category offers no differentiation whatsoever between these two devices. Every spec in this group — from the presence of a video light to the absence of sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper screen — is identical across the Motorola Moto G86 Power and the Realme P4 Pro 5G.

This is a complete and unambiguous tie. Neither phone distinguishes itself here, and none of the shared attributes represent a meaningful advantage or disadvantage for either device. Buyers should weight other categories entirely when making their decision.