Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo VS Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro have similar designs but some noticeable differences in their size and weight. The Moto Pad 60 Neo weighs 480 g, while the Moto Pad 60 Pro is heavier at 620 g. In terms of thickness, the Neo is slightly thicker at 7 mm, compared to the Pro’s 6.9 mm. The Pro is also larger in overall dimensions, with a width of 291.8 mm and a height of 189.1 mm, compared to the Neo's 254.6 mm width and 166.2 mm height.

When it comes to volume, the Moto Pad 60 Pro has a larger footprint with 380.7 cm³, while the Neo is smaller at 296.2 cm³. Both devices include a stylus, but neither has a detachable or backlit keyboard. Additionally, both are water resistant, and neither has tilt sensitivity.

Overall, the differences between the two models mainly come down to size and weight, with the Moto Pad 60 Pro being larger and heavier. The two devices are quite similar in terms of features, with the main variations lying in their physical dimensions and weight.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro feature different displays in terms of size, resolution, and additional enhancements. The Moto Pad 60 Neo has an 11″ screen with a resolution of 2560 x 1600 px and a pixel density of 274 ppi. In comparison, the Moto Pad 60 Pro boasts a larger 12.7″ screen with a resolution of 2944 x 1840 px and a slightly lower pixel density of 273 ppi.

Both tablets feature LCD, IPS displays with touch screen support, but the Pro model offers a higher refresh rate of 144Hz compared to the Neo's 90Hz. Additionally, the Pro supports HDR10 for better color and contrast, while the Neo does not have HDR support. The Pro also comes with an anti-reflection coating, a feature absent on the Neo's display.

Neither tablet includes branded damage-resistant glass or sapphire glass, and neither supports Dolby Vision or HDR10+ displays. Both devices lack e-paper displays. In summary, the Moto Pad 60 Pro provides a larger screen with higher resolution, better refresh rate, and enhanced display features like HDR10 and anti-reflection coating, while the Neo has a smaller screen with slightly lower resolution and fewer display enhancements.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro differ significantly in terms of performance specifications. The Moto Pad 60 Neo comes with 128GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, while the Moto Pad 60 Pro offers more storage at 256GB and a larger 12GB of RAM. In terms of processing power, the Neo has a CPU that includes 2 cores at 2.4 GHz and 6 cores at 2 GHz, whereas the Pro’s CPU features 1 core at 3.35 GHz, 3 cores at 3 GHz, and 4 cores at 2.2 GHz. This gives the Pro a higher overall clock speed.

For graphical performance, the Neo is equipped with the Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU clocked at 950 MHz, while the Pro has the Mali G615 MP6 GPU, with a higher clock speed of 1400 MHz. The Neo’s multi-core Geekbench 6 result is 2012, and its single-core result is 782. The Pro, however, outperforms the Neo with a multi-core Geekbench 6 score of 4610 and a single-core result of 1485.

Both devices support external memory cards and are built with 64-bit support and big.LITTLE technology. The Neo uses a 6 nm semiconductor size, while the Pro uses a more advanced 4 nm semiconductor. The Pro also has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB, compared to the Neo’s 2 MB. Additionally, the Pro has a higher memory bandwidth of 68.2 GB/s, compared to the Neo’s 17.07 GB/s. The maximum memory capacity for the Neo is 12GB, while the Pro supports up to 24GB of memory. The Neo runs on Android 15, and the Pro uses Android 14.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro have some differences in their camera specifications. The Moto Pad 60 Neo has an 8 MP main camera and a 5 MP front camera, while the Moto Pad 60 Pro features a higher 13 MP main camera and an 8 MP front camera. Both models include a flash, with the same number of flash LEDs (1), but neither has a front-facing LED flash.

Both tablets come with a variety of similar camera features such as touch autofocus, manual white balance, CMOS sensors, manual ISO, and a video light. Both also have continuous autofocus for movie recording and support HDR, though neither supports HDR10 recording or Dolby Vision. Neither model can shoot 360° panoramas or supports slow-motion video recording.

The Moto Pad 60 Neo and Moto Pad 60 Pro both offer manual exposure, manual focus, and manual shutter speed adjustments. However, neither has optical zoom, built-in optical image stabilization, or 3D photo/video recording capabilities. Both devices are missing advanced features like dual-tone or RGB LED flash and serial shot modes. Overall, the camera setups on both tablets are similar, with the Pro offering a higher megapixel count for both the main and front cameras.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro have similar audio features but with one key difference in connectivity. Both devices lack support for aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Low Latency, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless. They also both come with stereo speakers, ensuring a balanced sound experience. The Neo includes a 3.5 mm audio jack socket, while the Pro does not provide this feature, which could affect wired audio connectivity for the Pro.

Neither tablet has a built-in radio, which is another similarity between them. Overall, the main difference between the two models in terms of audio is the presence of the 3.5 mm jack on the Neo, giving it more flexibility for traditional wired headphones or audio devices.

Both models offer stereo speakers, but with the Pro lacking a 3.5 mm jack, users may need to rely more on Bluetooth or USB audio connections.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro have some differences when it comes to battery performance. The Moto Pad 60 Neo has a 7040 mAh battery, while the Moto Pad 60 Pro comes with a larger 10200 mAh battery, providing a higher overall battery capacity for the Pro model.

In terms of charging features, the Neo does not support fast charging, whereas the Pro supports fast charging, allowing for quicker recharging times. Both models feature rechargeable batteries, and neither has a removable battery. Both also include a battery level indicator to help users monitor their battery status, and neither supports wireless charging.

Overall, the Pro has a larger battery with fast charging capabilities, while the Neo offers a slightly smaller battery without fast charging support. Both devices share similar features like a rechargeable and non-removable battery, along with the ability to check battery levels.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro have many similar connectivity and feature options, though there are some differences. Both devices support Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 6 (with the Pro also supporting Wi-Fi 6E), and both have Bluetooth capabilities, with the Neo supporting Bluetooth 5.2 and the Pro supporting Bluetooth 5.3. The Pro also has a higher download speed of 7900 MBits/s, compared to the Neo's 3300 MBits/s.

Both models come with features like GPS, a child lock, a multi-user system, a USB Type-C port, and support for widgets. They also both have offline voice recognition, media pickers, dynamic theming, dark mode, and battery health checks. The Neo supports 5G, while the Pro does not, and the Pro has a fingerprint scanner, whereas the Neo does not. Additionally, the Pro has a compass and gyroscope, features the Neo lacks.

While both tablets have similar privacy and security options, including camera/microphone privacy settings, clipboard warnings, and app tracking protection, the Pro supports newer technologies like a faster Bluetooth version and Wi-Fi 6E. The Neo, on the other hand, offers 5G support, which the Pro does not. Both models have features like location tracking, customizable notifications, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture), making them versatile devices for various use cases.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro differ in terms of their DDR memory version. The Neo uses DDR4 memory, while the Pro is equipped with the newer DDR5 memory version.

This difference in memory version could impact the overall performance and efficiency, as DDR5 typically offers higher speeds and better power management compared to DDR4. However, aside from this distinction, no other specifications are provided in this group to compare further.