Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo VS Samsung Galaxy Tab A11

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 differ in several design aspects. The Moto Pad 60 Neo is heavier, weighing 480 g compared to the Tab A11's 337 g. Additionally, the Moto Pad 60 Neo is thinner, with a thickness of 7 mm, while the Tab A11 is slightly thicker at 8 mm. The dimensions also differ, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo being larger at 254.6 mm in width and 166.2 mm in height, compared to the Tab A11’s 211 mm width and 124.7 mm height.

In terms of volume, the Moto Pad 60 Neo is larger, with a total of 296.2 cm³ compared to the Tab A11's 210.5 cm³. The Moto Pad 60 Neo also includes a stylus, while the Tab A11 does not. Neither product has a detachable or backlit keyboard, and neither supports tilt sensitivity.

Regarding durability, the Moto Pad 60 Neo has water resistance, which is not available on the Tab A11. The Tab A11 does not have any water resistance rating specified, making the Moto Pad 60 Neo more resilient to water exposure.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 display specs show several differences. The Moto Pad 60 Neo has a larger 11″ screen, while the Tab A11 features a smaller 8.7″ display. In terms of resolution, the Moto Pad 60 Neo offers a sharper 2560 x 1600 px resolution, compared to the Tab A11's 1340 x 800 px resolution. As a result, the Moto Pad 60 Neo also has a higher pixel density of 274 ppi, compared to the Tab A11’s 179 ppi, which means the Moto Pad 60 Neo should deliver more detailed images.

Both devices feature an LCD display type and share the same 90Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and interaction. Neither device has branded damage-resistant glass, anti-reflection coating, HDR10 support, Dolby Vision, or a sapphire glass display. Both also support touch input, and neither has an e-paper display or HDR10+ support.

Overall, while both devices have similar display technology, the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo offers a larger and higher-resolution screen, while the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 has a smaller and lower-resolution display.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 share several performance characteristics, but there are also a few key differences. Both devices come with 128GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, and both support an external memory slot. The RAM speed on the Moto Pad 60 Neo is 2133 MHz, while the Tab A11 has a faster 4266 MHz RAM speed. The Moto Pad 60 Neo also has a slightly faster CPU, with a configuration of 2 x 2.4 GHz and 6 x 2 GHz, compared to the Tab A11's 2 x 2.2 GHz and 6 x 2 GHz.

When it comes to Geekbench 6 scores, the Moto Pad 60 Neo has higher results, with a multi-core score of 2012 and a single-core score of 782, while the Tab A11 achieves 1979 in multi-core and 729 in single-core. Both devices use a 6 nm semiconductor size and support 64-bit processing, big.LITTLE technology, and integrated LTE. Additionally, both devices feature integrated graphics, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo using an Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU and the Tab A11 using a Mali G57 GPU. However, the Moto Pad 60 Neo supports DirectX 12, whereas the Tab A11 supports DirectX 11.

Finally, both devices support HMP (heterogeneous multi-processing), and their maximum memory capacity is 12GB. The Moto Pad 60 Neo has a slightly higher maximum memory bandwidth at 17.07 GB/s compared to the Tab A11’s 17.1 GB/s, though the difference is minimal.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 have similar camera specifications, though there are a few differences. Both devices feature an 8 MP main camera and a 5 MP front camera. They also share a flash, a front camera, built-in HDR mode, touch autofocus, manual white balance, and manual ISO controls. Neither tablet can create panoramas in-camera, shoot 360° panoramas, or use built-in optical image stabilization.

The Moto Pad 60 Neo does not have a front-facing LED flash, while the Tab A11 shares this absence. Additionally, both devices support continuous autofocus when recording movies and have manual exposure control, but neither offers a manual shutter speed setting or serial shot mode.

One difference is that the Tab A11 supports slow-motion video recording, whereas the Moto Pad 60 Neo does not. Both tablets lack advanced features like 3D photo/video recording capabilities, dual-tone LED flash, or an RGB LED flash.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 both feature stereo speakers, ensuring immersive sound for media playback. However, the Moto Pad 60 Neo includes a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the Tab A11 does not have this feature. Neither device supports a built-in radio, so users will need to rely on streaming services for audio content.

In summary, the key difference is the presence of the 3.5 mm audio jack on the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo, which is absent in the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 have notable differences in their battery specs. The Moto Pad 60 Neo comes with a larger 7040 mAh battery, while the Tab A11 is equipped with a smaller 5100 mAh battery. Both tablets have rechargeable batteries, but neither features wireless charging. They both include a battery level indicator to help users monitor battery status, and neither has a removable battery.

A key difference is that the Tab A11 supports fast charging, while the Moto Pad 60 Neo does not.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 share several connectivity and feature similarities, though there are some key differences. Both devices support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and they both have a SIM card slot (1 SIM). Both support on-device machine learning, clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and can block app tracking. They also support split screen, have Live Text, full-page screenshots, and offer theme customization. Additionally, both tablets support PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode and allow users to play games while they download. They also feature an extra dim mode, media picker, dynamic theming, dark mode, and battery health check.

However, there are a few notable differences between the two. The Moto Pad 60 Neo supports 5G, while the Tab A11 does not. On the other hand, the Tab A11 includes a cellular module for mobile data connectivity, which the Moto Pad 60 Neo lacks. Both tablets have USB Type-C ports, but the Moto Pad 60 Neo has a faster download speed of 3300 MBits/s compared to the Tab A11’s 650 MBits/s. Neither device has Quick Start, focus modes, NFC, a fingerprint scanner, or an infrared sensor, and both track the current position of the device.

Both tablets also support a multi-user system, offline voice recognition, and customizable notifications. Neither device supports Ethernet, has a built-in projector, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner. The Tab A11 has a lower download speed than the Moto Pad 60 Neo, and it does not support 5G, but it does offer cellular connectivity for mobile data.

Both the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 feature DDR memory version 4. Therefore, in terms of memory technology, both devices are identical, offering the same DDR4 memory version for performance and efficiency.