Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo VS Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 have some similarities in their design specs but also a few notable differences. Both tablets share the same width of 254.6 mm and similar height dimensions, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo measuring 166.2 mm and the Redmi Pad 2 at 166 mm, making the difference in height minimal. In terms of thickness, the Moto Pad 60 Neo is slightly thinner at 7 mm, compared to the Redmi Pad 2's 7.4 mm. The Moto Pad 60 Neo is also lighter, weighing 480 g, while the Redmi Pad 2 is a bit heavier at 510 g.

Both devices have a similar volume, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo having a volume of 296.2 cm³ and the Redmi Pad 2's volume being 312.75 cm³, showing a slight difference in size. In terms of features, the Moto Pad 60 Neo includes a stylus, while the Redmi Pad 2 does not. Neither tablet supports tilt sensitivity or has a backlit keyboard. Neither product has a detachable keyboard either, though the Moto Pad 60 Neo does have water resistance, while the Redmi Pad 2 lacks this feature.

Overall, the Moto Pad 60 Neo offers a slightly more compact design and includes a stylus and water resistance, while the Redmi Pad 2 is slightly heavier, thicker, and lacks these additional features.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 share nearly identical display specifications. Both tablets feature an 11″ screen size with a resolution of 2560 x 1600 px, resulting in the same pixel density of 274 ppi. They both utilize LCD, IPS display technology, offering similar color and viewing angles. Additionally, both devices have a 90Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth visuals.

In terms of additional display features, neither tablet includes branded damage-resistant glass, sapphire glass, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or an e-paper display. Both also have a touch screen, providing intuitive interaction.

With identical specifications across all display attributes, there are no notable differences in the display quality or capabilities between the Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Redmi Pad 2.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 have similar performance specifications, with both offering 8GB of RAM and 12GB as the maximum memory capacity. However, they differ in several other areas. The Moto Pad 60 Neo has 128GB of internal storage, while the Redmi Pad 2 offers a larger 256GB of storage. Both devices support external memory cards, which provides flexibility for additional storage.

In terms of processing power, both tablets use a 6 nm semiconductor and support 64-bit architecture. The Moto Pad 60 Neo features a slightly higher CPU speed, with two cores running at 2.4 GHz and six cores at 2 GHz, compared to the Redmi Pad 2's two cores at 2.2 GHz and six cores at 2 GHz. Additionally, the Moto Pad 60 Neo has a GPU clock speed of 950 MHz, while the Redmi Pad 2’s GPU clock speed is 1000 MHz. Both devices support big.LITTLE technology and have 8 CPU threads, which enhances multitasking and efficiency.

Other key specs are also quite similar. Both tablets use integrated graphics, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo featuring the Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU and the Redmi Pad 2 using the Mali G57 GPU. The maximum memory bandwidth is almost identical, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo offering 17.07 GB/s and the Redmi Pad 2 providing 17.1 GB/s. The Moto Pad 60 Neo is equipped with Android 15, the same version found on the Redmi Pad 2, and both devices support HMP (heterogeneous multi-processing). The Moto Pad 60 Neo supports DirectX 12, while the Redmi Pad 2 supports DirectX 11, which may have slight implications for performance in certain applications.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 both feature 8 MP main cameras and 5 MP front cameras, providing similar basic camera capabilities. Both devices also support HDR mode and offer touch autofocus. However, the Moto Pad 60 Neo has a built-in flash and a video light, while the Redmi Pad 2 lacks both. The Moto Pad 60 Neo does not support slow-motion video recording, but the Redmi Pad 2 does.

Both devices share several other features, such as the ability to manually adjust white balance, ISO, and exposure, but neither has optical zoom, built-in optical image stabilization, or the ability to shoot 360° panoramas. Both tablets support continuous autofocus when recording movies, and neither offers Dolby Vision recording or HDR10 recording. Neither device has a front-facing LED flash.

While the camera setups are largely similar, the key difference is the inclusion of a flash and video light on the Moto Pad 60 Neo, which the Redmi Pad 2 lacks. Additionally, the Redmi Pad 2 is the only one with support for slow-motion video recording.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 offer nearly identical audio specifications. Both devices lack support for any advanced Bluetooth audio codecs such as aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Low Latency, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless. They both feature stereo speakers, which should provide a more immersive sound experience compared to mono speakers.

Both tablets are equipped with a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing users to connect wired headphones or other audio devices. Additionally, neither device includes a radio, which means neither can be used for FM or similar radio broadcasts.

Overall, the audio features on the Moto Pad 60 Neo and Redmi Pad 2 are quite similar, with both offering stereo speakers, a 3.5 mm audio jack, and no advanced Bluetooth audio codec support or radio functionality.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 differ in their battery capacities and charging features. The Moto Pad 60 Neo is equipped with a 7040 mAh battery, while the Redmi Pad 2 has a larger 9000 mAh battery, offering more capacity for extended usage.

In terms of charging, the Moto Pad 60 Neo does not support fast charging, whereas the Redmi Pad 2 does. Neither device supports wireless charging. Both devices feature a battery level indicator, and both are equipped with rechargeable, non-removable batteries.

Overall, the key differences lie in the battery power and the support for fast charging, with the Redmi Pad 2 offering a larger battery and faster charging capabilities compared to the Moto Pad 60 Neo.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 share many connectivity and feature specifications, with a few key differences. Both devices support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) for wireless connectivity and feature a 1 SIM card slot. Both also offer similar privacy features such as location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, clipboard warnings, and the ability to block app tracking. Additionally, both devices support split screen, have Live Text, full-page screenshots, and dynamic theming, and include customizable notifications.

In terms of cellular connectivity, the Moto Pad 60 Neo supports 5G, while the Redmi Pad 2 does not have 5G support but does have a cellular module. Both devices have USB Type-C ports and support Bluetooth, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo using Bluetooth version 5.2 and the Redmi Pad 2 using Bluetooth version 5.3. The Moto Pad 60 Neo offers faster download speeds, reaching 3300 MBits/s, while the Redmi Pad 2 supports download speeds of 650 MBits/s.

Other notable differences include the Moto Pad 60 Neo lacking a gyroscope, compass, or 3D facial recognition, while the Redmi Pad 2 includes a gyroscope, compass, and also has 3D facial recognition. Both devices support GPS and have voice commands, accelerometers, and the ability to track the device’s current position. Neither device has an HDMI output, NFC, or infrared sensor. Both are free and open source and support offline voice recognition, but the Moto Pad 60 Neo offers a more advanced Bluetooth version and faster download speeds.

Both the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 are equipped with DDR4 memory. This matches the specification for both products, indicating they both use the same generation of memory technology.

There are no differences in the DDR memory version between the two devices, as both utilize DDR4 memory.

Overall, the memory specification is identical for both devices in this category, with no variation in their DDR memory version.