Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo VS Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 (128GB / 4GB RAM)

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 share very similar dimensions, with both having the same width (254.6 mm) and nearly identical height (166.2 mm for the Moto Pad 60 Neo and 166 mm for the Redmi Pad 2). However, the Moto Pad 60 Neo is slightly lighter, weighing 480 g compared to the 510 g of the Redmi Pad 2. The thickness of the Moto Pad 60 Neo is 7 mm, whereas the Redmi Pad 2 is slightly thicker at 7.4 mm. The Moto Pad 60 Neo also has a slightly smaller volume, 296.2 cm³, compared to the 312.8 cm³ of the Redmi Pad 2.

The Moto Pad 60 Neo comes with a stylus included, a feature that the Redmi Pad 2 does not offer. Neither device supports a detachable or backlit keyboard, and neither has tilt sensitivity.

In terms of water resistance, the Moto Pad 60 Neo is water-resistant, while the Redmi Pad 2 does not have any water resistance rating.

Both the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 feature the same 11-inch screen size, with identical resolutions of 2560 x 1600 px and a pixel density of 274 ppi. The display type on both devices is LCD, IPS, and both devices support a 90Hz refresh rate for smooth visuals.

There are no differences in key display technologies either, as neither device has branded damage-resistant glass, supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, nor does either feature a sapphire glass display or an e-paper display. Additionally, both tablets are equipped with a touch screen.

In terms of display specs, the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 are exactly the same, offering the same screen size, resolution, and additional features.

When it comes to performance, the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 share some similarities, but there are a few key differences. Both devices have 128GB of internal storage and support external memory expansion. They also feature the same 6 nm semiconductor size, support 64-bit processing, and are equipped with integrated LTE and big.LITTLE technology. Both tablets use Android 15 and support HMP (Heterogeneous Multi-Processing).

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo has 8GB of RAM, while the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 has just 4GB of RAM. The Moto Pad 60 Neo also has a slightly higher CPU clock speed with 2 x 2.4 GHz cores and 6 x 2 GHz cores, compared to the Redmi Pad 2's 2 x 2.2 GHz and 6 x 2 GHz configuration. Both devices have 8 CPU threads. In terms of GPU, the Moto Pad 60 Neo features an Arm Mali-G57 MC2, with a GPU clock speed of 950 MHz, while the Redmi Pad 2 uses a Mali G57 GPU, with a slightly faster GPU clock speed of 1000 MHz.

Both tablets can handle a maximum memory of 12GB and have a maximum memory bandwidth of around 17 GB/s, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo's bandwidth at 17.07 GB/s and the Redmi Pad 2's at 17.1 GB/s. The RAM speed of the Moto Pad 60 Neo is 2133 MHz, while the Redmi Pad 2 has a faster RAM speed of 4266 MHz. The DirectX version differs as well, with the Moto Pad 60 Neo supporting DirectX 12 and the Redmi Pad 2 supporting DirectX 11.

Both the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 have an 8 MP main camera and a 5 MP front camera. The Moto Pad 60 Neo is equipped with a flash, while the Redmi Pad 2 does not include one. Both devices have a front camera, built-in HDR mode, and support touch autofocus. Neither device can create panoramas in-camera, shoot 360° panoramas, or record in 3D photo/video, but both have manual white balance, CMOS sensors, and manual exposure control.

The Moto Pad 60 Neo supports continuous autofocus when recording movies, while the Redmi Pad 2 also offers this feature but adds slow-motion video recording support, a feature the Moto Pad 60 Neo lacks. Both devices have manual ISO settings, but only the Moto Pad 60 Neo includes a video light.

Regarding additional camera features, both tablets lack optical zoom, BSI sensors, and built-in optical image stabilization. Neither supports HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, or a front-facing LED flash. Both have manual focus, but the Moto Pad 60 Neo supports a video light, which the Redmi Pad 2 does not.

Both the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 are quite similar in their audio features. Neither device supports any of the aptX audio technologies (aptX, aptX HD, aptX Low Latency, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, or LDAC). Both tablets are equipped with stereo speakers and also have a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing for wired audio connections. Neither device includes a radio.

In terms of audio capabilities, the Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Redmi Pad 2 are identical, with both offering stereo sound, 3.5 mm audio jack support, and no additional advanced audio technologies or radio functionality.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo is equipped with a 7040 mAh battery, while the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 features a larger 9000 mAh battery. Both tablets have rechargeable batteries, but neither has a removable battery. The Moto Pad 60 Neo does not support fast charging, while the Redmi Pad 2 does. Neither device supports wireless charging.

Both devices include a battery level indicator, allowing users to monitor battery status. However, the Moto Pad 60 Neo lacks fast charging support, which the Redmi Pad 2 offers. Additionally, both devices share the feature of having non-removable rechargeable batteries.

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 share many connectivity and feature similarities, but there are a few key differences. Both devices support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) and include a USB Type-C port. They also both have 1 SIM card slot, on-device machine learning, clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, the ability to block app tracking, and support split screen and full-page screenshots. Neither device offers Mail Privacy Protection, Quick Start, or Wi-Fi password sharing.

One key difference is that the Moto Pad 60 Neo supports 5G, while the Redmi Pad 2 does not. The Moto Pad 60 Neo also lacks a cellular module, whereas the Redmi Pad 2 includes one. The Bluetooth version on the Moto Pad 60 Neo is 5.2, while the Redmi Pad 2 has the slightly newer 5.3. Additionally, the Moto Pad 60 Neo has a higher download speed of 3300 MBits/s, compared to the Redmi Pad 2’s 650 MBits/s.

In terms of sensors, the Moto Pad 60 Neo lacks a gyroscope, compass, and barometer, while the Redmi Pad 2 includes a gyroscope and compass. Both devices support Galileo and have an accelerometer. Other common features include dark mode, dynamic theming, focus modes, media picker, and customizable notifications. Both devices have a child lock, GPS, and offline voice recognition, but neither supports Ethernet, has a fingerprint scanner, or features an infrared sensor or built-in projector.

Both the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 are equipped with DDR memory version 4. This specification is the same for both tablets, so there is no difference in their memory version.